Circumcision advocate - Revision history

WikiModEn2: /* Contradiction in terms */ Wikify

2022-11-18T16:47:38Z

Contradiction in terms: Wikify

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 18 November 2022
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Since, according to the current state of science and medical ethics, there is no medical justification for foreskin [[amputation]], there can be no advantages for the affected boy. Therefore, many circumcision advocates expose themselves to this allegedly "neutral" point of view from the outset.		Since, according to the current state of science and medical ethics, there is no medical justification for foreskin [[amputation]], there can be no advantages for the affected boy. Therefore, many circumcision advocates expose themselves to this allegedly "neutral" point of view from the outset.

	True [[Category:Circumcision fetishist\|circumcision fetishists]] like [[Brian Morris]] on the other hand speak straight away: He e.g. has repeatedly called for circumcision to be made compulsory for all boys worldwide, and has claimed that the intact [[foreskin]] would be a great danger for boys.		True [[Category:Circumcision fetishist\|circumcision fetishists]] like [[Brian Morris]] on the other hand speak straight away: He e.g. has repeatedly called for circumcision to be made compulsory for all boys worldwide, and has claimed that the [[intact]] [[foreskin]] would be a great danger for boys.

	== Bullying techniques ==		== Bullying techniques ==

WikiAdmin: added more text

2022-10-10T16:36:42Z

added more text

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:36, 10 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Circumcision advocate''' describes a person who vehemently advocates in favor of medically not necessary, non-therapeutic genital mutilation in children.		'''Circumcision advocate''' describes a person who vehemently advocates in favor of medically not necessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] aka [[foreskin]] [[amputation]] aka [[genital mutilation]] in children.

	Some of these people are committed to ~~their sexual fetish~~ as individuals and influence e.g. information available online (example: [[Jake Waskett]]). Others work in groups and denounce, ridicule or stalk [[intactivists]] or spread myths that have long been refuted by science as arguments for [[circumcision]].		== Reasons ==
			* Some of these people that advocate [[circumcision]] are have a sexual fetish and are committed to it as individuals and influence e.g. information available online (example: [[Jake Waskett]]).
			* Others work in groups and denounce, ridicule or stalk [[intactivists]] or spread myths that have long been refuted by science as arguments for [[circumcision]].
			* But many also simply believe that it is the [[Parental rights\|legal right of parents]] to choose and allow their sons to have part of their healthy genitalia cut off without any medical necessity.

	There is reason to believe that many (perhaps most) circumcision advocates are actually victims of circumcision who suffer from [[Psychological issues of male circumcision#Depression, rage, and grief in circumcised men\|denial of loss]].		There is reason to believe that many (perhaps most) circumcision advocates are actually victims of [[circumcision]] who suffer from [[Psychological issues of male circumcision#Depression, rage, and grief in circumcised men\|denial of loss]].

	== Contradiction in terms ==		== Contradiction in terms ==

WikiAdmin: wikify medical indication

2022-08-23T12:25:59Z

wikify medical indication

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 23 August 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:

	== Contradiction in terms ==		== Contradiction in terms ==
	Virtually all of the leading medical associations around the world agree that [[circumcision]] in children almost never has a medical indication. Nevertheless, it is significant that the circumcision advocates try again and again with sophistry and fallacious aurguments to pretend seriousness on the subject: They claim to take a "neutral" point of view and list the [[Arguments pro circumcision\|alleged advantages of genital mutilation]] alongside the disadvantages, although they regularly only touch on the latter, not but show that they want to describe them completely.		Virtually all of the leading medical associations around the world agree that [[circumcision]] in children almost never has a [[medical indication]]. Nevertheless, it is significant that the circumcision advocates try again and again with sophistry and fallacious aurguments to pretend seriousness on the subject: They claim to take a "neutral" point of view and list the [[Arguments pro circumcision\|alleged advantages of genital mutilation]] alongside the disadvantages, although they regularly only touch on the latter, not but show that they want to describe them completely.

	Since, according to the current state of science and medical ethics, there is no medical justification for foreskin [[amputation]], there can be no advantages for the affected boy. Therefore, many circumcision advocates expose themselves to this allegedly "neutral" point of view from the outset.		Since, according to the current state of science and medical ethics, there is no medical justification for foreskin [[amputation]], there can be no advantages for the affected boy. Therefore, many circumcision advocates expose themselves to this allegedly "neutral" point of view from the outset.
Line 94:		Line 94:

	== No choice for human rights violations ==		== No choice for human rights violations ==
	The approach of all websites and pages listed here, that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on these websites and pages should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.		The approach of all websites and pages listed here, that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without [[medical indication]] for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on these websites and pages should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.

	[[Peter W. Adler\|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision Is A Fraud: And The Coming Legal Reckoning]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent medical indication.		[[Peter W. Adler\|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision Is A Fraud: And The Coming Legal Reckoning]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent [[medical indication]].

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}

WikiAdmin: /* No choice for human rights violations */ fixed wiki link

2022-08-23T11:34:25Z

No choice for human rights violations: fixed wiki link

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:34, 23 August 2022
Line 96:		Line 96:
	The approach of all websites and pages listed here, that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on these websites and pages should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.		The approach of all websites and pages listed here, that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on these websites and pages should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.

	[[Peter W. Adler\|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision ~~is a~~ Fraud]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent medical indication.		[[Peter W. Adler\|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision Is A Fraud: And The Coming Legal Reckoning]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent medical indication.

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}

WikiAdmin: /* No choice for human rights violations */ Adler 2022

2022-08-23T11:32:15Z

No choice for human rights violations: Adler 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 23 August 2022
Line 95:		Line 95:
	== No choice for human rights violations ==		== No choice for human rights violations ==
	The approach of all websites and pages listed here, that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on these websites and pages should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.		The approach of all websites and pages listed here, that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on these websites and pages should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.

			[[Peter W. Adler\|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision is a Fraud]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent medical indication.

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}

WikiAdmin: added section "No choice for human rights violations"

2022-08-23T11:28:22Z

added section "No choice for human rights violations"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 23 August 2022
Line 45:		Line 45:
	\| [https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/ Circumcision Choice] \|\| [[Andrew Gross]] \|\| ''"supporting Choice NOT misinformation"'' \|\| The website name suggests that people have a choice of whether or not to be circumcised. This does not apply to children who by definition are not capable of giving consent. Their reaction about being listed in this IntactiWiki article proves that they are indeed bullying intactivists.<ref>{{REFweb		\| [https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/ Circumcision Choice] \|\| [[Andrew Gross]] \|\| ''"supporting Choice NOT misinformation"'' \|\| The website name suggests that people have a choice of whether or not to be circumcised. This does not apply to children who by definition are not capable of giving consent. Their reaction about being listed in this IntactiWiki article proves that they are indeed bullying intactivists.<ref>{{REFweb
	\|url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/intactwiki		\|url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/intactwiki
	\|title=German intactivist projects deceitful and bullying tactics		\|title=German intactivist projects deceitful and bullying tactics
	\|date=2020-08-22		\|date=2020-08-22
	\|accessdate=2021-03-01		\|accessdate=2022-08-23
			}}</ref><ref>{{REFweb
			\|url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/intactwiki2
			\|title=IntactiWiki creates a page dedicated to me
			\|date=2021-07-10
			\|accessdate=2022-08-23
			}}</ref><ref>{{REFweb
			\|url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/intactwiki3
			\|title=IntactiWiki accuses me of inflicting trauma on babies
			\|date=2020-07-27
			\|accessdate=2022-08-23
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	\|-		\|-
	\| [[Circumcision Academy of America]] \|\| [[Brian J. Morris]] assumed \|\| ''Circumcision Academy of America - Medically Based Information on Male Circumcision'' \|\| Seems to be created by the same people who also maintain CircumcisionInformation.com.		\| [[Circumcision Academy of America]] \|\| [[Brian J. Morris]] assumed \|\| ''Circumcision Academy of America - Medically Based Information on Male Circumcision'' \|\| Seems to be created by the same people who also maintain CircumcisionInformation.com.
Line 81:		Line 92:

	Most of these pages are run anonymously, while e.g. "[[REAL Circumcision Truths.]]" seems to be a covered advertising page from ''[[mohel]]'' [[Hayim Leiter]] who does all the contribution.		Most of these pages are run anonymously, while e.g. "[[REAL Circumcision Truths.]]" seems to be a covered advertising page from ''[[mohel]]'' [[Hayim Leiter]] who does all the contribution.

			== No choice for human rights violations ==
			The approach of all websites and pages listed here, that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on these websites and pages should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}

WikiAdmin: wikify cult

2022-08-08T14:29:39Z

wikify cult

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 8 August 2022
Line 27:		Line 27:
	* Give names.		* Give names.
	* Insist on [[arguments pro circumcision\|circumcision myths]] which are already debunked and refuted by science or testimonies.		* Insist on [[arguments pro circumcision\|circumcision myths]] which are already debunked and refuted by science or testimonies.
	* Call [[intactivism]] a "cult", a "crazy world" or even a "mental disorder".		* Call [[intactivism]] a "[[cult]]", a "crazy world" or even a "mental disorder".
	* Ridicule all arguments of the opponent, without counter arguments.		* Ridicule all arguments of the opponent, without counter arguments.
	* Send death threats.		* Send death threats.

WikiAdmin: wikify Circumcision Academy of America

2022-07-26T17:05:29Z

wikify Circumcision Academy of America

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:05, 26 July 2022
Line 50:		Line 50:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>
	\|-		\|-
	\| [~~https://www.circumcisionamerica.org/ CircumcisionAmerica~~] \|\| ~~N.N~~. \|\| ''Circumcision Academy of America - Medically Based Information on Male Circumcision'' \|\| Seems to be created by the same people who also maintain CircumcisionInformation.com.		\| [[Circumcision Academy of America]] \|\| [[Brian J. Morris]] assumed \|\| ''Circumcision Academy of America - Medically Based Information on Male Circumcision'' \|\| Seems to be created by the same people who also maintain CircumcisionInformation.com.
	\|-		\|-
	\| [[Circumcision Academy of Australia]] \|\| [[Brian J. Morris]] \|\| \|\| links to ''Circumcision Academy of America''		\| [[Circumcision Academy of Australia]] \|\| [[Brian J. Morris]] \|\| \|\| links to ''Circumcision Academy of America''

WikiAdmin: /* Circumcision advocate websites */ added Circumcision Academy of Australia

2022-07-22T06:46:11Z

Circumcision advocate websites: added Circumcision Academy of Australia

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 22 July 2022
Line 50:		Line 50:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>
	\|-		\|-
	\|\| [https://www.circumcisionamerica.org/ CircumcisionAmerica] \|\| N.N. \|\| ''Circumcision Academy of America - Medically Based Information on Male Circumcision'' \|\| Seems to be created by the same people who also maintain CircumcisionInformation.com.		\| [https://www.circumcisionamerica.org/ CircumcisionAmerica] \|\| N.N. \|\| ''Circumcision Academy of America - Medically Based Information on Male Circumcision'' \|\| Seems to be created by the same people who also maintain CircumcisionInformation.com.
			\|-
			\| [[Circumcision Academy of Australia]] \|\| [[Brian J. Morris]] \|\| \|\| links to ''Circumcision Academy of America''
	\|-		\|-
	\| [http://circumcisioninformation.com CircumcisionInformation.com] \|\| N.N. \|\| ''News and Information on all aspects involving Male Circumcision '' \|\| English-language website that promotes male circumcision. It seems to be addressed to Americans and Canadians. It is linked to		\| [http://circumcisioninformation.com CircumcisionInformation.com] \|\| N.N. \|\| ''News and Information on all aspects involving Male Circumcision '' \|\| English-language website that promotes male circumcision. It seems to be addressed to Americans and Canadians. It is linked to

WikiAdmin: wikify amputation

2021-11-13T11:10:12Z

wikify amputation

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 13 November 2021
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Virtually all of the leading medical associations around the world agree that [[circumcision]] in children almost never has a medical indication. Nevertheless, it is significant that the circumcision advocates try again and again with sophistry and fallacious aurguments to pretend seriousness on the subject: They claim to take a "neutral" point of view and list the [[Arguments pro circumcision\|alleged advantages of genital mutilation]] alongside the disadvantages, although they regularly only touch on the latter, not but show that they want to describe them completely.		Virtually all of the leading medical associations around the world agree that [[circumcision]] in children almost never has a medical indication. Nevertheless, it is significant that the circumcision advocates try again and again with sophistry and fallacious aurguments to pretend seriousness on the subject: They claim to take a "neutral" point of view and list the [[Arguments pro circumcision\|alleged advantages of genital mutilation]] alongside the disadvantages, although they regularly only touch on the latter, not but show that they want to describe them completely.

	Since, according to the current state of science and medical ethics, there is no medical justification for foreskin amputation, there can be no advantages for the affected boy. Therefore, many circumcision advocates expose themselves to this allegedly "neutral" point of view from the outset.		Since, according to the current state of science and medical ethics, there is no medical justification for foreskin [[amputation]], there can be no advantages for the affected boy. Therefore, many circumcision advocates expose themselves to this allegedly "neutral" point of view from the outset.

	True [[Category:Circumcision fetishist\|circumcision fetishists]] like [[Brian Morris]] on the other hand speak straight away: He e.g. has repeatedly called for circumcision to be made compulsory for all boys worldwide, and has claimed that the intact [[foreskin]] would be a great danger for boys.		True [[Category:Circumcision fetishist\|circumcision fetishists]] like [[Brian Morris]] on the other hand speak straight away: He e.g. has repeatedly called for circumcision to be made compulsory for all boys worldwide, and has claimed that the intact [[foreskin]] would be a great danger for boys.