Circumcision and Sexual Function Difficulties - Revision history

WikiModEn2: Wikify; add category.

2024-08-22T17:11:02Z

Wikify; add category.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 22 August 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube>		<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube>

	[[Morten Frisch]], {{MD}}, {{PhD}}, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at {{UNI\|Aalborg University\|AAU}} in [[Denmark]] discusses his 2011 study on sexual function difficulties in circumcised men and their female partners<ref>{{FrischM LindholmM GroenbaekM 2011}}</ref>. He also gives an account of the difficulties that researchers may face when their study results are not in favor of male circumcision.		[[Morten Frisch]], {{MD}}, {{PhD}}, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at [https://www.ssi.dk/ Statens Serum Institut] in Copenhagen and at {{UNI\|Aalborg University\|AAU}} in [[Denmark]] discusses his 2011 study on sexual function difficulties in [[circumcised]] men and their female partners<ref>{{FrischM LindholmM GroenbaekM 2011}}</ref>. He also gives an account of the difficulties that researchers may face when their study results are not in favor of male [[circumcision]].

	Frisch et al.'s study, which showed an excess of orgasm difficulties in circumcised men, as well as significantly increased frequencies of orgasm difficulties, pain during intercource and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment in women with circumcised spouses, was preceded by three other publications based on the same dataset, dealing with sexual dysfunctions in Danish men and women in relation to socioeconomic factors, health factors and lifestyle factors, respectively.		Frisch et al.'s study, which showed an excess of orgasm difficulties in [[circumcised]] men, as well as significantly increased frequencies of orgasm difficulties, pain during intercource and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment in women with [[circumcised]] spouses, was preceded by three other publications based on the same dataset, dealing with sexual dysfunctions in Danish men and women in relation to socioeconomic factors, health factors and lifestyle factors, respectively.

	All these three studies were published without serious criticisms from peer reviewers in the two most prestigious US journals of sexual health (''Journal of Sexual Medicine'' and ''Archives of Sexual Behavior''). However, adding one more variable to the analysis, namely male circumcision status, changed everything, and made reviewers extremely critical of everything about the whole dataset. Only after dealing with extensive, obstructive peer-review comments from one of the world's leading [[Brian J. Morris\|pro-circumcision propagandists]], a review which included serious insinuations of racism and amateurism, was the study finally published in the International Journal of Epidemiology 2011;40:1367-81.		All these three studies were published without serious criticisms from peer reviewers in the two most prestigious US journals of sexual health (''Journal of Sexual Medicine'' and ''Archives of Sexual Behavior''). However, adding one more variable to the analysis, namely male circumcision status, changed everything, and made reviewers extremely critical of everything about the whole dataset. Only after dealing with extensive, obstructive peer-review comments from one of the world's leading [[Brian J. Morris\|pro-circumcision propagandists]], a review which included serious insinuations of racism and amateurism, was the study finally published in the International Journal of Epidemiology 2011;40:1367-81.
Line 51:		Line 51:
	[[Category:Film]]		[[Category:Film]]
	[[Category:Bonobo3D channel]]		[[Category:Bonobo3D channel]]
			[[Category:Denmark]]

	[[Category:From IntactWiki]]		[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

WikiAdmin: using UNI template

2021-12-12T13:01:15Z

using UNI template

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 12 December 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube>		<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube>

	[[Morten Frisch]], {{MD}}, {{PhD}}, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at Aalborg University in [[Denmark]] discusses his 2011 study on sexual function difficulties in circumcised men and their female partners<ref>{{FrischM LindholmM GroenbaekM 2011}}</ref>. He also gives an account of the difficulties that researchers may face when their study results are not in favor of male circumcision.		[[Morten Frisch]], {{MD}}, {{PhD}}, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at {{UNI\|Aalborg University\|AAU}} in [[Denmark]] discusses his 2011 study on sexual function difficulties in circumcised men and their female partners<ref>{{FrischM LindholmM GroenbaekM 2011}}</ref>. He also gives an account of the difficulties that researchers may face when their study results are not in favor of male circumcision.

	Frisch et al.'s study, which showed an excess of orgasm difficulties in circumcised men, as well as significantly increased frequencies of orgasm difficulties, pain during intercource and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment in women with circumcised spouses, was preceded by three other publications based on the same dataset, dealing with sexual dysfunctions in Danish men and women in relation to socioeconomic factors, health factors and lifestyle factors, respectively.		Frisch et al.'s study, which showed an excess of orgasm difficulties in circumcised men, as well as significantly increased frequencies of orgasm difficulties, pain during intercource and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment in women with circumcised spouses, was preceded by three other publications based on the same dataset, dealing with sexual dysfunctions in Danish men and women in relation to socioeconomic factors, health factors and lifestyle factors, respectively.

WikiAdmin: using ABBR section

2021-10-13T12:43:31Z

using ABBR section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 13 October 2021
Line 46:		Line 46:
	* Additionally, in his response, Professor Frisch gives a thought provoking insight into the role of Brian J. Morris, when he served as a peer-reviewer trying hard to prevent the study from getting published.		* Additionally, in his response, Professor Frisch gives a thought provoking insight into the role of Brian J. Morris, when he served as a peer-reviewer trying hard to prevent the study from getting published.

			{{ABBR}}
	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

WikiAdmin: using STANDARDWORK FrischM LindholmM GroenbaekM 2011; reformatted REFs

2021-09-26T09:49:15Z

using STANDARDWORK FrischM LindholmM GroenbaekM 2011; reformatted REFs

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:49, 26 September 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube>		<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube>

	[[Morten Frisch]], {{MD}}, {{PhD}}, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at Aalborg University in Denmark discusses his 2011 study on sexual function difficulties in circumcised men and their female partners. He also gives an account of the difficulties that researchers may face when their study results are not in favor of male circumcision.		[[Morten Frisch]], {{MD}}, {{PhD}}, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at Aalborg University in [[Denmark]] discusses his 2011 study on sexual function difficulties in circumcised men and their female partners<ref>{{FrischM LindholmM GroenbaekM 2011}}</ref>. He also gives an account of the difficulties that researchers may face when their study results are not in favor of male circumcision.

	Frisch et al's study, which showed an excess of orgasm difficulties in circumcised men, as well as significantly increased frequencies of orgasm difficulties, pain during intercource and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment in women with circumcised spouses, was preceded by three other publications based on the same dataset, dealing with sexual dysfunctions in Danish men and women in relation to socioeconomic factors, health factors and lifestyle factors, respectively.		Frisch et al.'s study, which showed an excess of orgasm difficulties in circumcised men, as well as significantly increased frequencies of orgasm difficulties, pain during intercource and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment in women with circumcised spouses, was preceded by three other publications based on the same dataset, dealing with sexual dysfunctions in Danish men and women in relation to socioeconomic factors, health factors and lifestyle factors, respectively.

	All these three studies were published without serious criticisms from peer reviewers in the two most prestigious US journals of sexual health (Journal of Sexual Medicine and Archives of Sexual Behavior). However, adding one more variable to the analysis, namely male circumcision status, changed everything, and made reviewers extremely critical of everything about the whole dataset. Only after dealing with extensive, obstructive peer-review comments from one of the world's leading pro-circumcision propagandists, a review which included serious insinuations of racism and amateurism, was the study finally published in the International Journal of Epidemiology 2011;40:1367-~~1381~~.		All these three studies were published without serious criticisms from peer reviewers in the two most prestigious US journals of sexual health (''Journal of Sexual Medicine'' and ''Archives of Sexual Behavior''). However, adding one more variable to the analysis, namely male circumcision status, changed everything, and made reviewers extremely critical of everything about the whole dataset. Only after dealing with extensive, obstructive peer-review comments from one of the world's leading [[Brian J. Morris\|pro-circumcision propagandists]], a review which included serious insinuations of racism and amateurism, was the study finally published in the International Journal of Epidemiology 2011;40:1367-81.

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}
	* ~~Frisch M, Lindholm M, Grønbæk M. Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark. Int J Epidemiol~~ 2011 ~~Oct;40(5):1367-81~~		* {{FrischM LindholmM GroenbaekM 2011}}
	: ~~http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947~~ (This is the original paper, in which Professor Frisch et al present their controversial study findings)		: (This is the original paper, in which Professor Frisch et al. present their controversial study findings.)
	* Morris BJ, Waskett JH, Gray RH. Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? ~~Int J Epidemiol 2012 Feb;41(1):310-2~~		* {{REFjournal
	: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22422464 (This is a critical letter-to-the-editor by circumcision advocate Brian J. Morris et al)		\|last=Morris
	* Frisch M. Author's Response to: Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? ~~Int J Epidemiol 2012 Feb;41(1):312-4~~		\|init=BJ
	: http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/1/312.full (This is the author's response to the criticism by Morris, Waskett and Gray.		\|author-link=Brian J. Morris
	* Additionally, in his response, Professor Frisch gives a thought provoking insight into the role of Brian J. Morris, when he served as a peer-reviewer trying hard to prevent the study from getting published)		\|last2=Waskett
			\|init2=JH
			\|author2-link=Jake H. Waskett
			\|last3=Gray
			\|init3=RH
			\|author3-link=Ronald H. Gray
			\|title=Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect?
			\|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22422464
			\|journal=Int J Epidemiol
			\|date=2012-02
			\|volume=41
			\|issue=1
			\|pages=310-2
			\|accessdate=2021-09-26
			}}
			: (This is a critical letter-to-the-editor by circumcision advocate [[Brian J. Morris]] et al.)
			* {{REFjournal
			\|last=Frisch
			\|init=M
			\|author-link=Morten Frisch
			\|title=Author's Response to: Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect?
			\|url=http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/1/312.full
			\|journal=Int J Epidemiol
			\|date=2012-02
			\|volume=41
			\|issue=1
			\|pages=312-4
			\|accessdate=2021-09-26
			}}
			: (This is the author's response to the criticism by Morris, Waskett and Gray.)
			* Additionally, in his response, Professor Frisch gives a thought provoking insight into the role of Brian J. Morris, when he served as a peer-reviewer trying hard to prevent the study from getting published.

	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

WikiAdmin: using Template:PhD

2021-09-13T12:02:08Z

using Template:PhD

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 13 September 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube>		<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube>

	[[Morten Frisch]], {{MD}}, PhD, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at Aalborg University in Denmark discusses his 2011 study on sexual function difficulties in circumcised men and their female partners. He also gives an account of the difficulties that researchers may face when their study results are not in favor of male circumcision.		[[Morten Frisch]], {{MD}}, {{PhD}}, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at Aalborg University in Denmark discusses his 2011 study on sexual function difficulties in circumcised men and their female partners. He also gives an account of the difficulties that researchers may face when their study results are not in favor of male circumcision.

	Frisch et al's study, which showed an excess of orgasm difficulties in circumcised men, as well as significantly increased frequencies of orgasm difficulties, pain during intercource and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment in women with circumcised spouses, was preceded by three other publications based on the same dataset, dealing with sexual dysfunctions in Danish men and women in relation to socioeconomic factors, health factors and lifestyle factors, respectively.		Frisch et al's study, which showed an excess of orgasm difficulties in circumcised men, as well as significantly increased frequencies of orgasm difficulties, pain during intercource and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment in women with circumcised spouses, was preceded by three other publications based on the same dataset, dealing with sexual dysfunctions in Danish men and women in relation to socioeconomic factors, health factors and lifestyle factors, respectively.

WikiAdmin: using Template:MD; added SEEALSO

2021-06-14T15:48:19Z

using Template:MD; added SEEALSO

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 14 June 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube>		<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube>

	[[Morten Frisch]], an MD, PhD ~~and Doctor of Medicine~~, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at Aalborg University in Denmark discusses his 2011 study on sexual function difficulties in circumcised men and their female partners. He also gives an account of the difficulties that researchers may face when their study results are not in favor of male circumcision.		[[Morten Frisch]], {{MD}}, PhD, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at Aalborg University in Denmark discusses his 2011 study on sexual function difficulties in circumcised men and their female partners. He also gives an account of the difficulties that researchers may face when their study results are not in favor of male circumcision.

	Frisch et al's study, which showed an excess of orgasm difficulties in circumcised men, as well as significantly increased frequencies of orgasm difficulties, pain during intercource and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment in women with circumcised spouses, was preceded by three other publications based on the same dataset, dealing with sexual dysfunctions in Danish men and women in relation to socioeconomic factors, health factors and lifestyle factors, respectively.		Frisch et al's study, which showed an excess of orgasm difficulties in circumcised men, as well as significantly increased frequencies of orgasm difficulties, pain during intercource and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment in women with circumcised spouses, was preceded by three other publications based on the same dataset, dealing with sexual dysfunctions in Danish men and women in relation to socioeconomic factors, health factors and lifestyle factors, respectively.
Line 7:		Line 7:
	All these three studies were published without serious criticisms from peer reviewers in the two most prestigious US journals of sexual health (Journal of Sexual Medicine and Archives of Sexual Behavior). However, adding one more variable to the analysis, namely male circumcision status, changed everything, and made reviewers extremely critical of everything about the whole dataset. Only after dealing with extensive, obstructive peer-review comments from one of the world's leading pro-circumcision propagandists, a review which included serious insinuations of racism and amateurism, was the study finally published in the International Journal of Epidemiology 2011;40:1367-1381.		All these three studies were published without serious criticisms from peer reviewers in the two most prestigious US journals of sexual health (Journal of Sexual Medicine and Archives of Sexual Behavior). However, adding one more variable to the analysis, namely male circumcision status, changed everything, and made reviewers extremely critical of everything about the whole dataset. Only after dealing with extensive, obstructive peer-review comments from one of the world's leading pro-circumcision propagandists, a review which included serious insinuations of racism and amateurism, was the study finally published in the International Journal of Epidemiology 2011;40:1367-1381.

	{{~~REF~~}}		{{SEEALSO}}

	* Frisch M, Lindholm M, Grønbæk M. Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark. Int J Epidemiol 2011 Oct;40(5):1367-81		* Frisch M, Lindholm M, Grønbæk M. Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark. Int J Epidemiol 2011 Oct;40(5):1367-81
	: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 (This is the original paper, in which Professor Frisch et al present their controversial study findings)		: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 (This is the original paper, in which Professor Frisch et al present their controversial study findings)

	* Morris BJ, Waskett JH, Gray RH. Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? Int J Epidemiol 2012 Feb;41(1):310-2		* Morris BJ, Waskett JH, Gray RH. Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? Int J Epidemiol 2012 Feb;41(1):310-2
	: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22422464 (This is a critical letter-to-the-editor by circumcision advocate Brian J. Morris et al)		: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22422464 (This is a critical letter-to-the-editor by circumcision advocate Brian J. Morris et al)

	* Frisch M. Author's Response to: Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? Int J Epidemiol 2012 Feb;41(1):312-4		* Frisch M. Author's Response to: Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? Int J Epidemiol 2012 Feb;41(1):312-4
	: http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/1/312.full (This is the author's response to the criticism by Morris, Waskett and Gray.		: http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/1/312.full (This is the author's response to the criticism by Morris, Waskett and Gray.
			* Additionally, in his response, Professor Frisch gives a thought provoking insight into the role of Brian J. Morris, when he served as a peer-reviewer trying hard to prevent the study from getting published)

	* Additionally, in his response, Professor Frisch gives a thought provoking insight into the role of Brian J. Morris, when he served as a peer-reviewer trying hard to prevent the study from getting published)		{{REF}}

	[[Category:Film]]		[[Category:Film]]

WikiAdmin: Category:Film

2019-10-11T20:42:50Z

Category:Film

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 11 October 2019
Line 20:		Line 20:
	* Additionally, in his response, Professor Frisch gives a thought provoking insight into the role of Brian J. Morris, when he served as a peer-reviewer trying hard to prevent the study from getting published)		* Additionally, in his response, Professor Frisch gives a thought provoking insight into the role of Brian J. Morris, when he served as a peer-reviewer trying hard to prevent the study from getting published)

			[[Category:Film]]
	[[Category:Bonobo3D channel]]		[[Category:Bonobo3D channel]]

	[[Category:From IntactWiki]]		[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

WikiAdmin: Created page with "yfGkZZ-KzpU Morten Frisch, an MD, PhD and Doctor of Medicine, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at..."

2019-09-03T18:36:32Z

Created page with "<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube> Morten Frisch, an MD, PhD and Doctor of Medicine, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at..."

New page

<youtube>yfGkZZ-KzpU</youtube>

[[Morten Frisch]], an MD, PhD and Doctor of Medicine, a professor of sexual health epidemiology at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen and at Aalborg University in Denmark discusses his 2011 study on sexual function difficulties in circumcised men and their female partners. He also gives an account of the difficulties that researchers may face when their study results are not in favor of male circumcision.

Frisch et al's study, which showed an excess of orgasm difficulties in circumcised men, as well as significantly increased frequencies of orgasm difficulties, pain during intercource and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment in women with circumcised spouses, was preceded by three other publications based on the same dataset, dealing with sexual dysfunctions in Danish men and women in relation to socioeconomic factors, health factors and lifestyle factors, respectively.

All these three studies were published without serious criticisms from peer reviewers in the two most prestigious US journals of sexual health (Journal of Sexual Medicine and Archives of Sexual Behavior). However, adding one more variable to the analysis, namely male circumcision status, changed everything, and made reviewers extremely critical of everything about the whole dataset. Only after dealing with extensive, obstructive peer-review comments from one of the world's leading pro-circumcision propagandists, a review which included serious insinuations of racism and amateurism, was the study finally published in the International Journal of Epidemiology 2011;40:1367-1381.

{{REF}}

* Frisch M, Lindholm M, Grønbæk M. Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark. Int J Epidemiol 2011 Oct;40(5):1367-81
: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 (This is the original paper, in which Professor Frisch et al present their controversial study findings)

* Morris BJ, Waskett JH, Gray RH. Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? Int J Epidemiol 2012 Feb;41(1):310-2
: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22422464 (This is a critical letter-to-the-editor by circumcision advocate Brian J. Morris et al)

* Frisch M. Author's Response to: Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? Int J Epidemiol 2012 Feb;41(1):312-4
: http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/1/312.full (This is the author's response to the criticism by Morris, Waskett and Gray.

* Additionally, in his response, Professor Frisch gives a thought provoking insight into the role of Brian J. Morris, when he served as a peer-reviewer trying hard to prevent the study from getting published)

[[Category:Bonobo3D channel]]

[[Category:From IntactWiki]]