Difference between revisions of "Intactness"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add text and Wikify; Add category)
m (formattings)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a noun that means 1) the condition of being [[intact]], 2) the state of being unimpaired, and 3) completeness.<ref>{{REFweb
+
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a noun that means  
 +
# the condition of being [[intact]],  
 +
# the state of being unimpaired, and  
 +
# completeness.<ref>{{REFweb
 
  |url=https://www.wordnik.com/words/intactness
 
  |url=https://www.wordnik.com/words/intactness
 
  |title=Intactness
 
  |title=Intactness
Line 11: Line 14:
 
</ref>
 
</ref>
  
Among English-speaking nations, '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the norm in [[Australia]], [[Canada]], [[New Zealand]], and the [[United Kingdom]]; and is becoming the norm in the [[United States]].<ref name="stat2016">{{REFweb
+
Among English-speaking nations, '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the norm in [[Australia]], [[Canada]], [[New Zealand]], and the [[United Kingdom]];<ref name="stat2016">{{REFweb
 
  |url=https://circstatistics.github.io/
 
  |url=https://circstatistics.github.io/
 
  |title=Global Circumcision Statistics and Estimates
 
  |title=Global Circumcision Statistics and Estimates
 
  |publisher=https://circstatistics.github.io
 
  |publisher=https://circstatistics.github.io
 
  |date=2024-04-01
 
  |date=2024-04-01
  |accessdate=2024-04-01
+
  |accessdate=2024-05-05
 +
}}</ref> and is transitioning to the norm in the [[United States]].<ref name="jacobson2021">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Jacobson
 +
|first=Deborah L.
 +
|init=
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Balmert
 +
|first2=Lauren C.
 +
|init2=
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|last3=Holl
 +
|first3=Jane L.
 +
|init3=
 +
|author3-link=
 +
|last4=Rosoklija
 +
|first4=Ilina
 +
|init4=
 +
|author4-link=
 +
|last5=Davis
 +
|first5=Matthew M.
 +
|init5=
 +
|author5-link=
 +
|last6=Johnson
 +
|first6Emilie K.
 +
|init6=
 +
|author6-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Nationwide Circumcision Trends: 2003 to 2016
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=J Urol
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2021-01
 +
|volume=205
 +
|issue=1
 +
|article=
 +
|pages=257-63
 +
|url=https://www.auajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1097/JU.0000000000001316
 +
|pubmedID=32716676
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1097/JU.0000000000001316
 +
|accessdate=2024-05-05
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
  
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the norm in all European nations, all latin American nations, China, and India.<ref name="stat2016" />
+
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the norm in all European nations, all Latin American nations, [[China]],  India, and Mongolia.<ref name="stat2016" />
 +
 
 +
Unfortunately, '''intactness''' has been shamed in the [[United States]] and American males have been discouraged from keeping their erogenous, protective, and healthy [[foreskin]].<ref name="garrett2023-12-21">{{REFweb
 +
|url=https://intactamerica.org/foreskin-phobia-intact-penis-shamed/
 +
|title=Foreskin Phobia: How The Intact Penis Has Been Shamed
 +
|last=Garrett
 +
|first=Connor
 +
|init=
 +
|author-link=Connor Judson Garrett
 +
|publisher=Intact America
 +
|date=2023-12-21
 +
|accessdate=2024-05-15
 +
}}</ref>
 +
{{SEEALSO}}
 +
* {{REFweb
 +
|url=https://peacefulbeginningsrosemary.wordpress.com/circ-information/having-a-foreskin/
 +
|title=Having a Foreskin
 +
|last=Anonymous
 +
|first=
 +
|init=
 +
|publisher=Peaceful Beginnings
 +
|date=2012-07-17
 +
|accessdate=2024-05-05
 +
}}
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
 
 
 
 
 
[[Category:Education]]
 
[[Category:Education]]
 
[[Category:Statistics]]
 
[[Category:Statistics]]
 
[[Category:Term]]
 
[[Category:Term]]

Latest revision as of 12:11, 3 June 2024

Intactness is a noun that means

  1. the condition of being intact,
  2. the state of being unimpaired, and
  3. completeness.[1]

Among English-speaking nations, Intactness is the norm in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom;[2] and is transitioning to the norm in the United States.[3]

Intactness is the norm in all European nations, all Latin American nations, China, India, and Mongolia.[2]

Unfortunately, intactness has been shamed in the United States and American males have been discouraged from keeping their erogenous, protective, and healthy foreskin.[4]

See also

  • REFweb Anonymous (17 July 2012). Having a Foreskin, Peaceful Beginnings. Retrieved 5 May 2024.

References

  1. REFweb Anonymous. Intactness, Wordnik. Retrieved 12 April 2024.
  2. a b REFweb (1 April 2024). Global Circumcision Statistics and Estimates, https://circstatistics.github.io. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
  3. REFjournal Jacobson, Deborah L., Balmert, Lauren C., Holl, Jane L., Rosoklija, Ilina, Davis, Matthew M., Johnson. Nationwide Circumcision Trends: 2003 to 2016. J Urol. January 2021; 205(1): 257-63. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
  4. REFweb Garrett, Connor (21 December 2023). Foreskin Phobia: How The Intact Penis Has Been Shamed, Intact America. Retrieved 15 May 2024.