Difference between revisions of "Lower clinical neurophysiological elicitability of the penilo-cavernosus reflex"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text and citation.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text.) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|format=PDF | |format=PDF | ||
|accessdate=2022-03-01 | |accessdate=2022-03-01 | ||
| − | }}</ref> This classification was based on the work of Simon Podhar in Slovenia. Podnar relates that he had observed in clinical practice that the penilo-cavernosus reflex seemed to be more difficult to elicit clinically in circumcised men. A formal study was established to test these obverations.<ref>{{REFjournal | + | }}</ref> This classification was based on the work of Simon Podhar in Slovenia. Podnar relates that he had observed in clinical practice that the penilo-cavernosus reflex seemed to be more difficult to elicit clinically in circumcised men. A formal study was established to test these obverations.<ref name="podnar2012">{{REFjournal |
|last=Podnar | |last=Podnar | ||
|first=Simon | |first=Simon | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| + | The bulbocavernosus reflex has been found to be delayed or absent at a higher rate than the general population of [[intact]] men in diabetic men with complaints of erectile impotence, and men whose penises have been circumcised or in intact men who have permanent retraction of the [[foreskin]] behind the [[glans penis]].<ref name="podnar2012" /> | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
Revision as of 04:08, 2 March 2022
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Lower clinical neurophysiological elicitability of the penilo-cavernosus reflex is classified as a late complication of circumcision by Iacob et al. (2021).[1] This classification was based on the work of Simon Podhar in Slovenia. Podnar relates that he had observed in clinical practice that the penilo-cavernosus reflex seemed to be more difficult to elicit clinically in circumcised men. A formal study was established to test these obverations.[2]
The bulbocavernosus reflex has been found to be delayed or absent at a higher rate than the general population of intact men in diabetic men with complaints of erectile impotence, and men whose penises have been circumcised or in intact men who have permanent retraction of the foreskin behind the glans penis.[2]
References
- ↑
Iacob SI, Feinn RS, Sardi L. Systematic review of complications arising from male circumcision 
. BJUI Compass. 11 November 2021; : 1–25. DOI. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
- ↑ a b Podnar, Simon. Clinical elicitation of the penilo-cavernosus reflex in circumcised men. BJU Int. February 2012; 109(4): 582-5. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
