Difference between revisions of "American urologists and the practice of male circumcision"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add text.)
(Add section.)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
There are many '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''.
 
There are many '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''.
 
==Lack of experience with a normal body part==
 
==Lack of experience with a normal body part==
American male urologists are drawn from the general population in which the great majority of males have received a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]], so they have no personal experience of the functions and sensations from the natural [[intact]] [[foreskin]].
+
American male urologists are drawn from the general population in which the great majority of males have received a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]], so most have no personal experience of the functions<ref>{{REFweb
 +
|url=http://www.intactaus.org/information/functionsoftheforeskin/
 +
|title=Functions of the Foreskin
 +
|last=Helard
 +
|first=Lou
 +
|author-link=
 +
|publisher=Intact Australia
 +
|website=
 +
|date=2014-08-01
 +
|accessdate=2023-04-08
 +
|format=
 +
|quote=
 +
}}</ref> and sensations from the natural [[intact]] [[foreskin]].
  
American female urologists don't have male body parts so they have no experience at all of the functions and sensations of the natural intact foreskin.
+
American female urologists don't have male body parts so they have no experience at all of the functions and [[Foreskin sensitivity| sensations]] of the natural intact foreskin.
  
 
This abysmal state of ignorance cannot serve the patients well.
 
This abysmal state of ignorance cannot serve the patients well.
 +
 +
{{REF}}
  
  

Revision as of 20:42, 8 April 2023

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

There are many American urologists and the practice of male circumcision.

Lack of experience with a normal body part

American male urologists are drawn from the general population in which the great majority of males have received a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic infant circumcision, so most have no personal experience of the functions[1] and sensations from the natural intact foreskin.

American female urologists don't have male body parts so they have no experience at all of the functions and sensations of the natural intact foreskin.

This abysmal state of ignorance cannot serve the patients well.

References

  1. REFweb Helard, Lou (1 August 2014). Functions of the Foreskin, Intact Australia. Retrieved 8 April 2023.