Difference between revisions of "Intact-friendly doctors list"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (Add text.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Construction Site}}
 
 
The general ignorance of the human [[foreskin]] in the American medical community and the resultant prevailing poor quality of care provided to [[foreskinned]] boys has led to the creation of the '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''.
 
The general ignorance of the human [[foreskin]] in the American medical community and the resultant prevailing poor quality of care provided to [[foreskinned]] boys has led to the creation of the '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''.
  
The '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is maintained on the website of [[Your Whole Baby]]. The names of intact-friendly doctors are provided by parents who had a good experience with a doctor.
+
The '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is maintained on the website of [[Your Whole Baby]]. The names of intact-friendly doctors are provided by parents who had a good experience with a doctor. The intact-friendly doctors are grouped by states so it is easy for parents to locate a nearby physician.
  
 
The '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' may be accessed at [https://www.yourwholebaby.org/doctors Intact-friendly doctors list].
 
The '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' may be accessed at [https://www.yourwholebaby.org/doctors Intact-friendly doctors list].
Line 31: Line 30:
 
}}</ref> and that it is completely normal for some boys not to be retractable until after puberty.
 
}}</ref> and that it is completely normal for some boys not to be retractable until after puberty.
  
* know that [[Forced foreskin retraction| forcible retraction of the foreskin]] is harmful, and that it is not necessary for cleaning, examination, or catheterization.
+
* know that [[Forced foreskin retraction| forcible retraction of the foreskin]] is harmful, and that it is not necessary for cleaning, examination, or [[Catheterization of intact boys| catheterization]].
  
 
* know that foreskin care in the young child is very simple: “Only clean what is seen” and “Leave it alone!”
 
* know that foreskin care in the young child is very simple: “Only clean what is seen” and “Leave it alone!”
  
 
* Should foreskin or urinary tract problems occur, they use non-invasive treatments, make every effort to preserve and protect genital wholeness, and know that [[circumcision]] of children is rarely, if ever, needed.
 
* Should foreskin or urinary tract problems occur, they use non-invasive treatments, make every effort to preserve and protect genital wholeness, and know that [[circumcision]] of children is rarely, if ever, needed.
 +
{{SEEALSO}}
 +
* [[Development of retractable foreskin]]
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
  
Line 42: Line 43:
 
[[Category:Parental information]]
 
[[Category:Parental information]]
 
[[Category:Physicians]]
 
[[Category:Physicians]]
 +
 
[[Category:USA]]
 
[[Category:USA]]

Revision as of 20:57, 6 May 2023

The general ignorance of the human foreskin in the American medical community and the resultant prevailing poor quality of care provided to foreskinned boys has led to the creation of the Intact-friendly doctors list.

The Intact-friendly doctors list is maintained on the website of Your Whole Baby. The names of intact-friendly doctors are provided by parents who had a good experience with a doctor. The intact-friendly doctors are grouped by states so it is easy for parents to locate a nearby physician.

The Intact-friendly doctors list may be accessed at Intact-friendly doctors list.

According to Doctors Opposing Circumcision, such physicians:

  • respect the natural developmental process of the foreskin, and its variability. They know not to hurry the process nor worry about normal variations like ballooning, smegma, etc.
  • know that the average age for full retractability of the foreskin is about age 10,[1] and that it is completely normal for some boys not to be retractable until after puberty.
  • know that foreskin care in the young child is very simple: “Only clean what is seen” and “Leave it alone!”
  • Should foreskin or urinary tract problems occur, they use non-invasive treatments, make every effort to preserve and protect genital wholeness, and know that circumcision of children is rarely, if ever, needed.

See also

References

  1. REFjournal Thorvaldsen MA, Meyhoff H. Patologisk eller fysiologisk fimose? [Pathological or physiological phimosis?] (Danish). Ugeskr Læger. 2005; 167(17): 1858-1862. Retrieved 6 May 2023.