Redundant foreskin: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Wikify. |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Redundant foreskin''' (aka '''Insufficient foreskin removal''') is classed technically as a [[complication]] of elective [[circumcision]]. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected [[circumcised]] appearance has not been achieved. The expected appearance of the circumcised [[penis]] was established in the Second Century when the Jewish rabbis instituted [[periah]] and has no relationship to health. There are no additional health issues from insufficient [[foreskin]] removal. A [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]] revision may be carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal | '''Redundant foreskin''' or '''redundant prepuce''' (aka '''Insufficient foreskin removal''') is a fictitious diagnosis. There is no medically recognized definition of "redundant prepuce". It is classed technically as a [[complication]] of elective [[circumcision]]. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected [[circumcised]] appearance after a [[circumcision]] has not been achieved. | ||
The expected appearance of the circumcised [[penis]] was established in the Second Century when the Jewish rabbis instituted [[periah]] and has no relationship to health. There are no additional health issues from insufficient [[foreskin]] removal. There are no health issues from the existence of an overhanging [[acroposthion]]. | |||
A [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]] revision may be carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Fekete | |last=Fekete | ||
|first=Ferenc | |first=Ferenc | ||
| Line 31: | Line 35: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
There is no accepted definition of redundant [[foreskin]]. | Circumcision revision is a [[Financial incentive| revenue generator]] for [[Urologist| urological surgeons]]. The term ''redundant foreskin'' appears to have been invented as a sales aid for harmful, non-therapeutic surgical [[amputation]] of the [[foreskin]]. | ||
There is no generally accepted definition of redundant [[foreskin]]. | |||
==Acroposthion== | ==Acroposthion== | ||
A longer [[foreskin]] that some may consider "redundant", also may be considered to be an [[acroposthion]], that was highly regarded in ancient Greece.<ref name="hodges2001">{{REFjournal | A longer [[foreskin]] that some may consider "redundant", also may be considered to be an [[acroposthion]], that was highly regarded in ancient Greece.<ref name="hodges2001">{{REFjournal | ||
| Line 54: | Line 60: | ||
|accessdate=2019-11-15 | |accessdate=2019-11-15 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
==Chinese promotion== | |||
The [[Shang Ring]] was invented in [[China]] and is sold for the purpose of performing a [[circumcision]]. The claim of "redundant prepuce" appears to have been used to increase the sales of the Shang Ring. | |||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Acroposthion]] | |||
* [[Long foreskins]] | |||
* [[Longer foreskin is favored]] | |||
* [[Regret men]] | |||
* [[Unsatisfactory cosmetic results including uncircumcised appearance]] | * [[Unsatisfactory cosmetic results including uncircumcised appearance]] | ||
==Urologists and redundant foreskin== | |||
Many urologists promote circumcision because of the substantial fee that they earn when a circumcision is performed. [[Foreskinned]] men should be extremely cautious when consulting a urologist for any reason. | |||
{{LINKS}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/uncircumcised_talk/comments/1k6iey8/how_can_you_tell_if_someone_has_redundant/ | |||
|title=How can you tell if someone has redundant foreskin? Is it usual in the uncircumcised? | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|publisher=REDDIT | |||
|date=2025-04 | |||
|accessdate=2025-10-17 | |||
}} | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Circumcision complication]] | [[Category:Circumcision complication]] | ||
[[Category:Greece]] | |||
[[de:Überflüssige Vorhaut]] | [[de:Überflüssige Vorhaut]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:34, 17 April 2026
Redundant foreskin or redundant prepuce (aka Insufficient foreskin removal) is a fictitious diagnosis. There is no medically recognized definition of "redundant prepuce". It is classed technically as a complication of elective circumcision. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance after a circumcision has not been achieved.
The expected appearance of the circumcised penis was established in the Second Century when the Jewish rabbis instituted periah and has no relationship to health. There are no additional health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. There are no health issues from the existence of an overhanging acroposthion.
A circumcision revision may be carried out to achieve the desired appearance.[1]
Circumcision revision is a revenue generator for urological surgeons. The term redundant foreskin appears to have been invented as a sales aid for harmful, non-therapeutic surgical amputation of the foreskin.
There is no generally accepted definition of redundant foreskin.
Acroposthion
A longer foreskin that some may consider "redundant", also may be considered to be an acroposthion, that was highly regarded in ancient Greece.[2]
Chinese promotion
The Shang Ring was invented in China and is sold for the purpose of performing a circumcision. The claim of "redundant prepuce" appears to have been used to increase the sales of the Shang Ring.
See also
- Acroposthion
- Long foreskins
- Longer foreskin is favored
- Regret men
- Unsatisfactory cosmetic results including uncircumcised appearance
Urologists and redundant foreskin
Many urologists promote circumcision because of the substantial fee that they earn when a circumcision is performed. Foreskinned men should be extremely cautious when consulting a urologist for any reason.
External links
Anonymous (April 2025). How can you tell if someone has redundant foreskin? Is it usual in the uncircumcised?
, REDDIT. Retrieved 17 October 2025.
References
- ↑
Fekete F, Török A, Nyirády P. Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions. Int Urol Nephrol. June 2011; 43(2): 431-5. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 4 February 2022.
- ↑ Hodges, Frederick M.. The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics and Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, and the Kynodesme. Bull. Hist. Med. September 2001; 75(3): 375-405. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 November 2019.
