Difference between revisions of "Australia"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add Belmaine)
(Add Links section.)
Line 102: Line 102:
 
  |accessdate=2019-19-28
 
  |accessdate=2019-19-28
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
 +
 +
{{LINKS}}
 +
 +
* {{REFweb
 +
|url=http://www.circumstitions.com/Australia.html
 +
|title=Circumcision in Australia
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|last=Young
 +
|first=Hugh
 +
|author-link=
 +
|publisher=Circumstitions
 +
|website=
 +
|date=2005?
 +
|accessdate=2019-10-28
 +
|format=
 +
|quote=
 +
}}
  
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
  
 
[[Category:Circumcision]]
 
[[Category:Circumcision]]

Revision as of 14:35, 28 October 2019

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

A report on circumcision in Australia.

Australia, like other English-speaking countries, once had a rather high rate of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision of male infants, however Australia now has a very low rate of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision.

History

The incidence of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision in Australia approached that of the United States in the 1930s through 1960s.

Douglas Gairdner,s famous, classic 1949 paper, The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision,[1] seems to have had no effect in Australia.

The Australian Paediatric Journal issue of June 1970, published three articles critical of non-therapeutic infant circumcision.[2][3][4]

Position statements of medical societies

After considering the three papers published in the Australian Paediatric Journal, the Australian Paediatric Society adopted a resolution on April 24, 1971 that the circumcision of male infants should not be performed as a routine measure. That resolution subsequently was reported in a letter published in the Medical Journal of Australia on May 22, 1971.[5]

External links

References

  1. REFjournal Gairdner, Douglas M.. The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision. British Medical Journal. 1949; 2(4642): 1433-1437. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
  2. REFjournal Leitch, I.O., et al. Circumcision: the continuing enigma. Aust Paediatr J. 1 March 1970; 6(1): 59-65. PMID. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
  3. REFjournal Birrell, R.G.. Circumcision. Aust Paediatr J. 1 June 1960; 6(2): 66-7. PMID. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
  4. REFjournal Smith, E.D.. Another view of circumcision. Aust Paediatr J. 1 June 1970; 6(2): 67-9. PMID. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
  5. REFjournal Belmaine, SP. Circumcision. Medical Journal of Australia. 22 May 1971; 1: 1148. Retrieved Error: Invalid time..