Indiana - Wrongful circumcision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m remove extra blank lines |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add SEEALSO section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In a 2003 '''Indiana wrongful circumcision''' case, the jury found that no harm was done to the boy so no damages were awarded. | In a 2003 '''Indiana wrongful circumcision''' case, the jury found that no harm was done to the boy so no damages were awarded. | ||
{{SEEALSO}} | |||
[[Foreskin#Physiological_functions| Physiological functions of the foreskin]] | |||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:44, 15 September 2022
In a 2003 Indiana wrongful circumcision case, the jury found that no harm was done to the boy so no damages were awarded.
See also
Physiological functions of the foreskin