Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010): Difference between revisions

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats
21,520 edits
Create page.
 
mNo edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Construction Site}}
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a circumcision lawsuit from the state of North Dakota.
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a circumcision lawsuit from the state of North Dakota.
Mervin Gajewski, 78, was in a Watford City hospital when he heard the blood-curdling screams of a newborn boy who was suffering the extreme [[pain]] of an unanesthetized, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]]. He later decided to sue the State of North Dakota in an effort to get these cruel procedures halted in North Dakota. The court, however, ruled that a 78-year-old man was not representative of newborn infant [[intact]] boys so he lacked standing to sue and his case was dismissed.<ref>{{REFnews
|title=North Dakota Man Sues to Stop Infant Circumcision
|url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2005/2005-05-22_theforum.php
|last=Warden
|first=James
|init=
|author-link=
|last2=
|init2=
|author2-link=
|publisher=The Forum
|website=
|date=2005
|season=
|accessdate=2023-08-07
|format=
|quote=
}}</ref>
==Appeal==
Gajewski appealed the dismissal to the [https://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court Supreme Court of North Dakota], however the dismissal was upheld.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://law.justia.com/cases/north-dakota/supreme-court/2010/20100231.html
|title=Gajewski v. State
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|publisher=Justia
|date=2010
|accessdate=2023-08-07
}}</ref> <ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/nd-supreme-court/1549480.html
|title=Mervin Gajewski as next friend of all North Dakotans including intact minor males, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General, Defendants and Appellees (2010)
|publisher=Findlaw
|date=2010
|accessdate=2023-08-07
}}</ref>
The case was dismissed based on procedural issues. The merits of the case were never considered by any court.
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Fishbeck v. North Dakota]]
* [[United States of America]]
{{REF}}




[[Category:Lawsuit]]
[[Category:Lawsuit]]
[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]
[[Category:Pain]]
[[Category:USA]]
[[Category:USA]]

Latest revision as of 20:57, 26 April 2024

Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010) is a circumcision lawsuit from the state of North Dakota.

Mervin Gajewski, 78, was in a Watford City hospital when he heard the blood-curdling screams of a newborn boy who was suffering the extreme pain of an unanesthetized, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision. He later decided to sue the State of North Dakota in an effort to get these cruel procedures halted in North Dakota. The court, however, ruled that a 78-year-old man was not representative of newborn infant intact boys so he lacked standing to sue and his case was dismissed.[1]

Appeal

Gajewski appealed the dismissal to the Supreme Court of North Dakota, however the dismissal was upheld.[2] [3]

The case was dismissed based on procedural issues. The merits of the case were never considered by any court.

See also

References

  1. ↑ REFnews Warden, James (2005)."North Dakota Man Sues to Stop Infant Circumcision", The Forum. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  2. ↑ REFweb Anonymous (2010). Gajewski v. State, Justia. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  3. ↑ REFweb (2010). Mervin Gajewski as next friend of all North Dakotans including intact minor males, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General, Defendants and Appellees (2010), Findlaw. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Gajewski_v._State_of_North_Dakota_(2010)&oldid=37332"