Intactness: Difference between revisions

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Add text and Wikify; Add category
Add text and Wikify.
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a noun that means 1) the condition of being [[intact]], 2) the state of being unimpaired, and 3) completeness.<ref>{{REFweb
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a noun that means  
# the condition of being [[intact]],  
# the state of being unimpaired, and  
# completeness.<ref>{{REFweb
  |url=https://www.wordnik.com/words/intactness
  |url=https://www.wordnik.com/words/intactness
  |title=Intactness
  |title=Intactness
Line 11: Line 14:
</ref>
</ref>


Among English-speaking nations, '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the norm in [[Australia]], [[Canada]], [[New Zealand]], and the [[United Kingdom]]; and is becoming the norm in the [[United States]].<ref name="stat2016">{{REFweb
Among English-speaking nations, '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the norm in [[Australia]], [[Canada]], [[New Zealand]], and the [[United Kingdom]];<ref name="stat2016">{{REFweb
  |url=https://circstatistics.github.io/
  |url=https://circstatistics.github.io/
  |title=Global Circumcision Statistics and Estimates
  |title=Global Circumcision Statistics and Estimates
  |publisher=https://circstatistics.github.io
  |publisher=https://circstatistics.github.io
  |date=2024-04-01
  |date=2024-04-01
  |accessdate=2024-04-01
  |accessdate=2024-05-05
}}</ref>
}}</ref> and is transitioning to the norm in the [[United States]].<ref name="jacobson2021">{{REFjournal
 
|last=Jacobson
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the norm in all European nations, all latin American nations, China, and India.<ref name="stat2016" />
|first=Deborah L.
{{REF}}
|init=
|author-link=
|last2=Balmert
|first2=Lauren C.
|init2=
|author2-link=
|last3=Holl
|first3=Jane L.
|init3=
|author3-link=
|last4=Rosoklija
|first4=Ilina
|init4=
|author4-link=
|last5=Davis
|first5=Matthew M.
|init5=
|author5-link=
|last6=Johnson
|first6Emilie K.
|init6=
|author6-link=
|etal=no
|title=Nationwide Circumcision Trends: 2003 to 2016
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=J Urol
|location=
|date=2021-01
|volume=205
|issue=1
|article=
|pages=257-63
|url=https://www.auajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1097/JU.0000000000001316
|pubmedID=32716676
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1097/JU.0000000000001316
|accessdate=2024-05-05
}}</ref> [[Foreskinned]] men usually enjoy their intactness and would not have it any other way.


'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the norm in all European nations, all Latin American nations, [[China]],  [[India]], and Mongolia.<ref name="stat2016" />


Unfortunately, '''intactness''' has been shamed in the [[United States]] and American males have been discouraged from keeping their erogenous, protective, and healthy [[foreskin]],<ref name="garrett2023-12-21">{{REFweb
|url=https://intactamerica.org/foreskin-phobia-intact-penis-shamed/
|title=Foreskin Phobia: How The Intact Penis Has Been Shamed
|last=Garrett
|first=Connor
|init=
|author-link=Connor Judson Garrett
|publisher=Intact America
|date=2023-12-21
|accessdate=2024-05-15
}}</ref> but increasing levels of intactness are now being reported among newborn infant boys.<ref name="jacobson2021" />
{{SEEALSO}}


* [[Living with a foreskin in circumcised America]]
{{LINKS}}
* {{REFweb
|url=https://peacefulbeginningsrosemary.wordpress.com/circ-information/having-a-foreskin/
|title=Having a Foreskin
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|publisher=Peaceful Beginnings
|date=2012-07-17
|accessdate=2024-05-05
}}
{{REF}}


[[Category:Culture]]
[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:Statistics]]
[[Category:Statistics]]
[[Category:Term]]
[[Category:Term]]
[[de:Intaktheit]]

Latest revision as of 16:43, 30 July 2025

Intactness is a noun that means

  1. the condition of being intact,
  2. the state of being unimpaired, and
  3. completeness.[1]

Among English-speaking nations, Intactness is the norm in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom;[2] and is transitioning to the norm in the United States.[3] Foreskinned men usually enjoy their intactness and would not have it any other way.

Intactness is the norm in all European nations, all Latin American nations, China, India, and Mongolia.[2]

Unfortunately, intactness has been shamed in the United States and American males have been discouraged from keeping their erogenous, protective, and healthy foreskin,[4] but increasing levels of intactness are now being reported among newborn infant boys.[3]

See also

  • REFweb Anonymous (17 July 2012). Having a Foreskin, Peaceful Beginnings. Retrieved 5 May 2024.

References

  1. REFweb Anonymous. Intactness, Wordnik. Retrieved 12 April 2024.
  2. a b REFweb (1 April 2024). Global Circumcision Statistics and Estimates, https://circstatistics.github.io. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
  3. a b REFjournal Jacobson, Deborah L., Balmert, Lauren C., Holl, Jane L., Rosoklija, Ilina, Davis, Matthew M., Johnson. Nationwide Circumcision Trends: 2003 to 2016. J Urol. January 2021; 205(1): 257-63. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
  4. REFweb Garrett, Connor (21 December 2023). Foreskin Phobia: How The Intact Penis Has Been Shamed, Intact America. Retrieved 15 May 2024.