Indiana - Wrongful circumcision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add text. Remove Construction Site template. |
m remove extra blank lines |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
* [http://www.onpointnews.com/NEWS/Jury-Finds-No-Harm-to-Boy-From-Wrongful-Circumcision.html Jury finds no harm to boy] | * [http://www.onpointnews.com/NEWS/Jury-Finds-No-Harm-to-Boy-From-Wrongful-Circumcision.html Jury finds no harm to boy] | ||
<!-- {{REF}} --> | <!-- {{REF}} --> | ||
[[Category:Litigation]] | [[Category:Litigation]] | ||
[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]] | [[Category:Litigation over circumcision]] | ||
[[Category:From IntactWiki]] | [[Category:From IntactWiki]] | ||
Revision as of 07:34, 7 July 2020
In a 2003 Indiana wrongful circumcision case, the jury found that no harm was done to the boy so no damages were awarded.