Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010): Difference between revisions

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wikify.
Install link; Add section.
Line 19: Line 19:
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}</ref>  
}}</ref>  
 
==Appeal==
Gajewski appealed the dismissal to the Supreme Court of North Dakota, however the dismissal was upheld.<ref>{{REFweb
Gajewski appealed the dismissal to the [https://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court Supreme Court of North Dakota], however the dismissal was upheld.<ref>{{REFweb
  |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/north-dakota/supreme-court/2010/20100231.html
  |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/north-dakota/supreme-court/2010/20100231.html
  |title=Gajewski v. State
  |title=Gajewski v. State

Revision as of 11:11, 8 August 2023

Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010) is a circumcision lawsuit from the state of North Dakota.

Mervin Gajewski, 78, was in a Watford City hospital when he heard the blood-curdling screams of a newborn boy who was suffering the extreme pain of an unanesthetized, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision. He later decided to sue the State of North Dakota in an effort to get these cruel procedures halted in North Dakota. The court, however, ruled that a 78-year-old man was not representative of newborn infant intact boys so he lacked standing to sue and his case was dismissed.[1]

Appeal

Gajewski appealed the dismissal to the Supreme Court of North Dakota, however the dismissal was upheld.[2] [3]

The case was dismissed based on procedural issues. The merits of the case were never considered by any court.

See also

References