Boldt v. Boldt: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Create page. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add to External links. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Construction Site}} | |||
'''Boldt v. Boldt''' is formally a child custody case from the state of Oregon, however it actually is about the proposed circumcision of a boy. | '''Boldt v. Boldt''' is formally a child custody case from the state of Oregon, however it actually is about the proposed circumcision of a boy. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
|accessdate=2020-04-18 | |accessdate=2020-04-18 | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFnews | |||
|title=Ask boy, 12, if he wants to be circumcised, court says | |||
|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/law/01/25/circumcision.case/index.html | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|coauthors= | |||
|publisher=CNN | |||
|website= | |||
|date=2008-01-25 | |||
|accessdate=2020-04-19 | |||
|quote= | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFjournal | |||
|last=Diekema | |||
|first=Doug | |||
|author-link= | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Boldt v. Boldt: A pediatric ethics perspective | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=J Clin Ethics | |||
|location= | |||
|date=2009-09 | |||
|volume=20 | |||
|issue=3 | |||
|pages=251-7 | |||
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19845198 | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=19845198 | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI= | |||
|accessdate=2020-04-19 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFjournal | |||
|last=Geisheker | |||
|first=John V. | |||
|author-link=John V. Geisheker | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Where is the voice of the man the child will become? Defending the child's right to an open future | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=J Clin Ethics | |||
|location= | |||
|date=2010-03 | |||
|volume=21 | |||
|issue=1 | |||
|pages=86-88 | |||
|url=http://www.circinfo.org/DOC_Boldt_case.html | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=20465080 | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI= | |||
|accessdate=2020-04-19 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFdocument | |||
|title=Boldt and Boldt, (CC No. 98-2318-D(3); CA A126175; SC S054714) | |||
|url= https://law.justia.com/cases/oregon/supreme-court/2008/s054714.html | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|publisher=Oregon Supreme Court | |||
|format= | |||
|date=2008-01-25 | |||
|accessdate=2020-04-19 | |||
}} | |||
Revision as of 13:25, 19 April 2020
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Boldt v. Boldt is formally a child custody case from the state of Oregon, however it actually is about the proposed circumcision of a boy.
External links
Geisheker, John. American legal precedent confirms child’s right to reject circumcision
. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
(25 January 2008)."Ask boy, 12, if he wants to be circumcised, court says", CNN. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
Diekema, Doug. Boldt v. Boldt: A pediatric ethics perspective. J Clin Ethics. September 2009; 20(3): 251-7. PMID. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- Geisheker, John V.. Where is the voice of the man the child will become? Defending the child's right to an open future. J Clin Ethics. March 2010; 21(1): 86-88. PMID. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
Boldt and Boldt, (CC No. 98-2318-D(3); CA A126175; SC S054714), Oregon Supreme Court. (25 January 2008). Retrieved 19 April 2020.
.svg){kind=icon}
Category:USA
Category:Litigation over circumcision
Category:Jurisprudence