Difference between revisions of "Routine Infant Circumcision"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (adjust accessdate) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text and citation; Add LINKS section.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Mainly in the United States, boys are still [[Circumcision|circumcised]] in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this is done without informing or asking the parents previously at all. | Mainly in the United States, boys are still [[Circumcision|circumcised]] in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this is done without informing or asking the parents previously at all. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic circumcision of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref> | ||
Routine infant circumcision (i. e. non-therapeutic circumcision without consent) is an unlawful procedure for which damages may be recovered.<ref name="llewellnyn1995">{{REFjournal | Routine infant circumcision (i. e. non-therapeutic circumcision without consent) is an unlawful procedure for which damages may be recovered.<ref name="llewellnyn1995">{{REFjournal | ||
| Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
|accessdate=2020-01-04 | |accessdate=2020-01-04 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Routine infant circumcision no longer exists in the United States, except when a hospital or doctor makes an error for which they can be sued. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{LINKS}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | * J. Steven Svoboda, Robert S. Van Howe, James G. Dwyer, ''[https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1166&context=facpubs Informed Consent for Neonatal Circumcision: An Ethical and Legal Conundrum]''. 17 J Contemporary Health Law Policy 61 (2000). | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
Revision as of 18:22, 22 June 2020
RIC is an acronym for Routine Infant Circumcision.
Mainly in the United States, boys are still circumcised in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this is done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.
The word routine, when applied to non-therapeutic circumcision of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' since court rulings started to require informed consent in 1972.[1]
Routine infant circumcision (i. e. non-therapeutic circumcision without consent) is an unlawful procedure for which damages may be recovered.[2]
Routine infant circumcision no longer exists in the United States, except when a hospital or doctor makes an error for which they can be sued.
External links
- J. Steven Svoboda, Robert S. Van Howe, James G. Dwyer, Informed Consent for Neonatal Circumcision: An Ethical and Legal Conundrum. 17 J Contemporary Health Law Policy 61 (2000).
References
- ↑ Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)
- ↑
Llewellyn, David. Legal remedies for penile torts. The Compleat Mother. 1995; 40: 16. Retrieved 4 January 2020.
