Dyspareunia

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dyspareunia is painful sexual intercourse due to medical or psychological causes. The pain can primarily be on the external surface of the genitalia, or deeper in the pelvis upon deep pressure against the cervix. It can affect a small portion of the vulva or vagina or be felt all over the surface. Understanding the duration, location, and nature of the pain is important in identifying the causes of the pain.[1]

Numerous physical, psychological, and social or relationship causes can contribute to pain during sexual encounters. Commonly, multiple underlying causes contribute to the pain. The pain can be acquired or congenital. Symptoms of dyspareunia may also occur after menopause. Diagnosis is typically by physical examination and medical history.[1]

Underlying causes determine treatment. Many women experience relief when physical causes are identified and treated.[1]

Globally, dyspareunia has been estimated to affect between 8–22% of women, at some point in their lives.[2][1]

The role of male circumcision

Warren & Bigelow (1994) reported that "provides slack skin on the shaft of the erect penis allowing it to glide within its own sheath of skin during intercourse. This provides for more enjoyable intercourse for both partners and avoids problems with vaginal dryness." It follows that when the foreskin is amputated by circumcision, the gliding action is not present, so vaginal abrasions and pain are more likely.[3] O'Hara & O'Hara (1999) reported that "[w]omen were also more likely to state that they had had vaginal discomfort with a circumcised partner either often or occasionally as opposed to rarely or never."[4]

External links

References

  1. a b c d REFweb Wikipedia article: Dyspareunia. Retrieved 12 June 2020.
  2. REFjournal Latthe, P. / M. Latthe / L. Say / M. Gülmezoglu / K.S. Khan (6 July 2006): WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity, in: BMC Public Health. 6 (1): 177, PMID, PMC, DOI.
  3. REFjournal Warren, John / Jim Bigelow (September 1994): The case against circumcision, in: Br J Sex Med: 6-8. Retrieved 19 June 2020.
  4. REFjournal O'Hara, K / J O'Hara (1 January 1999): The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner, in: BJU Int. 83 Suppl 1: 79-84, PMID, DOI. Retrieved 19 June 2020.