Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Arguments pro circumcision

281 bytes added, 00:28, 16 January 2020
m
no edit summary
*: Urinary tract infections are much more common in women than in men, which is due to the shorter urethra. It is entirely sufficient to treat a urinary tract infection with antibiotics.
* '''"Circumcision supposedly protects against penile cancer.2'''
*: Penile cancer is one of the rarest types of cancer worldwide. In addition, the cancer is one of advanced age. Men have a higher risk of developing breast cancer than penile cancer. Cancer of the [[penis]] is also a cancer of the [[foreskin]] '''''and'''' the [[Glans penis|glans]] and quite well treatable. This cancer is no reason to force [[circumcision]] on boys.
* '''2Circumcision “Circumcision supposedly protects against cervical cancer / HPV."'''
*: The aforementioned diseases were mentioned during the modern history of [[circumcision]] to somehow justify non-medical circumcision medically. For prevention of the diseases mentioned however, other non-destructive measures (such as hygiene, condoms, etc.) are more appropriate. America with the highest circumcision rate of all western countries has also still the highest HIV / AIDS rate in all Western countries. There are now also well-tolerated vaccinations against the infection with HPV, such as Gardasil.
* '''2Circumcision “Circumcision supposedly protects against [[phimosis]]."'''
*: Of course you cannot get [[phimosis]] without a [[foreskin]]. So this argument is as silly as if you would say that aputation of the feet protects from athlete's foot. [[Circumcision]] for [[phimosis]] prophylaxis is pure nonsense. - There are actually medically indicated cases of [[phimosis]]. But more than 90% of them can be corrected without surgery. One must clearly distinguish between the physiological ''(natural)'' and the pathological [[phimosis]]. Boys usually have a so-called physiological [[phimosis]]: the [[foreskin]] is bonded to the [[Glans penis|penis]] and cannot be retracted. Only by changes in the hormonal balance of adolescent boys, the bonded membrane dissolves slowly and allows to retract the [[foreskin]]. The average age here is 10.4 years. Each [[phimosis]] diagnosis that is made in an otherwise healthy boy before the end of puberty that can urinate without a problem, is a misdiagnosis. Especially during the enrollment examination, [[phimosis]] is often diagnosed because some doctors still mistakenly believe that on the enrollment the [[foreskin]] must be fully retractable. As a parent, please ignore this diagnosis. If the child has no problems, you have to make him any problems.
*: The [[BVKJ|Professional Association of Paediatricians]] in Germany has now canceled the [[phimosis]] investigations in the examination books for boys in early childhood.
== Esthetical arguments ==
* '''"A circumcised penis looks nicer."'''
*: That is not a valid measure of [[circumcision]] on children. With the same aesthetic argument, for example, Chinese girls girls‘ feet were fueled bound in former times, so they could barely walk as adult women because of the deformation of the feet.
== Sexual arguments ==
== Ironic confrontation ==
* [http://reductress.com/post/were-piercing-my-babys-tongue-heres-why/ We’re Piercing My Baby’s Tongue. Here’s Why.]
* {{REFbook
|url=https://www.amazon.com/dp/165183430X/
|title=Reasons To Circumcise: A Comprehensive Unbiased Evidence-Based Guide To All Of The Data In Favor Of Circumcision
|website=Amazon
|last=Dickman, M.D.
|first=Hugh
|date=2019-12-29
|accessdate=2020-01-15
}}
{{REF}}
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,181
edits

Navigation menu