Difference between revisions of "Richard Duncker"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (added image)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[File:RichardDuncker2019.jpg|thumb|Richard Duncker 2019]]
 
{{FromIntactWiki
 
{{FromIntactWiki
 
|Title=Richard Duncker
 
|Title=Richard Duncker
Line 11: Line 12:
 
<youtube>I53bgxGl88A</youtube>
 
<youtube>I53bgxGl88A</youtube>
  
{{NYT de}}
+
In 2020 he spoke in a video message on [[WWDOGA]]:
2020 sprach er in einer Videobotschaft zum [[WWDOGA]]:
 
  
 
{{Citation
 
{{Citation
  |Text=Vielen Dank an alle Beteiligten für die Organisation dieser zeitgemäßen Gelegenheit, den 8. Jahrestag des [[Kölner Beschneidungsurteil|Urteils des Kölner Landgerichts]] zu begehen, das Urteil, das nicht-therapeutische männliche Beschneidung klar als Körperverletzung einstufte. Diese Entscheidung wurde sofort [[Beschneidungsgesetz|auf politischem Wege außer Kraft gesetzt]]. Doch der Gedanke bleibt im politischen, öffentlichen und juristischen Bereich präsent.
+
  |Text=Thank you to everyone involved for organising this timely opportunity to mark the 8th anniversary of the [[Cologne circumcision court judgment|ruling by the Cologne Court]] that non-therapeutic male circumcision is actual bodily harm. That ruling was immediately [[German Circumcision Act|politically sidelined]]. But the thought is out there in the political, public and judicial domains.
  
Die Annahme, dass es in Ordnung sei, einem gesunden Kind ein gesundes Stück seines Körpers abzuschneiden, ist kaum zu rechtfertigen. Mittlerweile gibt es immer mehr Akademiker aus verschiedenen Fachbereichen, die die Beschneidung ohne Vorbehalte erforschen. Verschiedene Naturwissenschaftler zeigen inzwischen deutlich, dass die [[Vorhaut]] spezielles, erogenes Gewebe darstellt. Juristen, Ethiker und Philosophen scheuen sich nicht mehr, das Thema der nichttherapeutischen Genitalbeschneidungen aufzugreifen. Und viele haben darauf hingewiesen, dass einer großen Zahl an Kindern auf alarmierende Art und Weise Grundrechte verweigert werden, Jungen, Mädchen und solchen, die mit Variationen von Genitalmerkmalen geboren wurden.
+
The idea that is OK to cut a healthy bit off a healthy child is a hard thing to justify. There are now an ever growing number of academics from various disciplines examining circumcision with un-blinkered eyes. The physical sciences now quite clearly show that the [[foreskin]] is specialised erogenous tissue. The lawyers, ethicists, and philosophers are no longer afraid to tackle the issue of non-therapeutic genital cutting, and many have pointed to the alarming way basic rights are denied to a great many children, boys, girls, and those born with variations of genital anatomy.
  
In den [[Religion und Kultur|Religionen und Kulturen]], die nicht-therapeutische Genitalbeschneidungen praktizieren, gibt es inzwischen eine wachsende Anzahl von Menschen, die die Praktiken in Frage stellen. Durch unsere [[Intaktivisten-Gruppen|Vielzahl an Gruppen und Organisationen]] sind wir jetzt eine Bewegung, mit der man rechnen muss. Eine Bewegung, die Unterstützung bietet, ihre Stimme für die Opfer erhebt und den Willen hat, die zuständigen Stellen in die Pflicht zu nehmen. Für etwas, was im Grunde genommen eine "nicht zufällige Verletzung" im (britischen) Kinderschutzrecht und eine Körperverletzung im Strafrecht darstellt.
+
The [[Religion and culture|religions and cultures]] that practice non-therapeutic genital cutting now have a growing body of people within them who are questioning the practices.
 +
In our many [[Intactivist groups|groups and organisations]] we are now a movement to be reckoned with. A movement that provides support, a voice for victims, and the will to hold the authorities to account, for what is essentially a non-accidental injury in child protection law and a wounding in criminal law.
  
Der [[WWDOGA|Weltweite Tag der Genitalen Selbstbestimmung]] legt einen klaren Fokus auf das wichtige Thema, nämlich Kindern Schutz vor nicht-therapeutischer Genitalbeschneidung [[HGM|in all ihren Erscheinungsformen]] zu bieten.
+
The [[WWDOGA|Worldwide Day of Genital Autonomy]] has provided a clear focus on the important issue which is providing children with protection from non-therapeutic genital cutting [[HGM|in all its forms and manifestations]].
 
  |Author=[[Richard Duncker]]
 
  |Author=[[Richard Duncker]]
 
  |Source=[[WWDOGA]] 2020
 
  |Source=[[WWDOGA]] 2020

Revision as of 19:36, 2 June 2020

Richard Duncker 2019

Template:FromIntactWiki

Richard Duncker is a british intactivist, chair of the UK charity, Genital Autonomy, and founder of Men Do Complain.

Richard Duncker created the Bloodstained Suit and wore the first suit in a Men Do Complain demonstration in the UK outside the Department of Health in Whitehall.

Video interview by James Loewen for the Bonobo3D Youtube Channel, recorded in Helsinki, Finland, October 2012:

In 2020 he spoke in a video message on WWDOGA:

Thank you to everyone involved for organising this timely opportunity to mark the 8th anniversary of the ruling by the Cologne Court that non-therapeutic male circumcision is actual bodily harm. That ruling was immediately politically sidelined. But the thought is out there in the political, public and judicial domains.

The idea that is OK to cut a healthy bit off a healthy child is a hard thing to justify. There are now an ever growing number of academics from various disciplines examining circumcision with un-blinkered eyes. The physical sciences now quite clearly show that the foreskin is specialised erogenous tissue. The lawyers, ethicists, and philosophers are no longer afraid to tackle the issue of non-therapeutic genital cutting, and many have pointed to the alarming way basic rights are denied to a great many children, boys, girls, and those born with variations of genital anatomy.

The religions and cultures that practice non-therapeutic genital cutting now have a growing body of people within them who are questioning the practices. In our many groups and organisations we are now a movement to be reckoned with. A movement that provides support, a voice for victims, and the will to hold the authorities to account, for what is essentially a non-accidental injury in child protection law and a wounding in criminal law.

The Worldwide Day of Genital Autonomy has provided a clear focus on the important issue which is providing children with protection from non-therapeutic genital cutting in all its forms and manifestations.
Richard Duncker (WWDOGA 2020)[1]

External links

References

  1. REFweb WWDOGA 2020 - Richard Duncker, YouTube, MOGiS e.V.. Retrieved 13 May 2020.