(Un)cut - Jeffrey Braverman - Revision history

WikiModEn2: Add link in SEEALSO section; delete unneeded REF section.

2024-05-12T13:02:29Z

Add link in SEEALSO section; delete unneeded REF section.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 12 May 2024
Line 8:		Line 8:
	(UN)CUT explores circumcision’s medical, sexual and religious complexities against the backdrop of San Francisco’s latest ban controversy. Interviewing key players on both sides of the issue, the documentary illuminates opposing perspectives to inspire more dialogue and understanding. While circumcision remains mainstream in the [[United States]], trends are shifting and the [[intactivist]] movement is gaining momentum. (UN)CUT takes a personal, and sometimes humorous look at what happens when religious freedoms intersect with modern law and collide head-on with infant rights.		(UN)CUT explores circumcision’s medical, sexual and religious complexities against the backdrop of San Francisco’s latest ban controversy. Interviewing key players on both sides of the issue, the documentary illuminates opposing perspectives to inspire more dialogue and understanding. While circumcision remains mainstream in the [[United States]], trends are shifting and the [[intactivist]] movement is gaining momentum. (UN)CUT takes a personal, and sometimes humorous look at what happens when religious freedoms intersect with modern law and collide head-on with infant rights.
	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}
			* [[Circumcision]]
	* [[United States of America]]		* [[United States of America]]
	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
Line 13:		Line 14:
	* [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/uncut-jeffrey-braverman-circumcision-movie_n_1237749.html '(UN)CUT': Jeffrey Braverman's Film To Explore Circumcision's Complexities]<br><br>		* [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/uncut-jeffrey-braverman-circumcision-movie_n_1237749.html '(UN)CUT': Jeffrey Braverman's Film To Explore Circumcision's Complexities]<br><br>

	~~{{REF}}~~

	{{DEFAULTSORT:Uncut Jeffrey Braverman}}		{{DEFAULTSORT:Uncut Jeffrey Braverman}}

WikiModEn2: Add SEEALSO section.

2024-05-12T11:54:39Z

Add SEEALSO section.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:54, 12 May 2024
Line 7:		Line 7:

	(UN)CUT explores circumcision’s medical, sexual and religious complexities against the backdrop of San Francisco’s latest ban controversy. Interviewing key players on both sides of the issue, the documentary illuminates opposing perspectives to inspire more dialogue and understanding. While circumcision remains mainstream in the [[United States]], trends are shifting and the [[intactivist]] movement is gaining momentum. (UN)CUT takes a personal, and sometimes humorous look at what happens when religious freedoms intersect with modern law and collide head-on with infant rights.		(UN)CUT explores circumcision’s medical, sexual and religious complexities against the backdrop of San Francisco’s latest ban controversy. Interviewing key players on both sides of the issue, the documentary illuminates opposing perspectives to inspire more dialogue and understanding. While circumcision remains mainstream in the [[United States]], trends are shifting and the [[intactivist]] movement is gaining momentum. (UN)CUT takes a personal, and sometimes humorous look at what happens when religious freedoms intersect with modern law and collide head-on with infant rights.
			{{SEEALSO}}
			* [[United States of America]]
	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}

WikiModEn2: Add title line; Add Video section; Add category; Wikify; Delete dead link.

2022-10-14T11:36:19Z

Add title line; Add Video section; Add category; Wikify; Delete dead link.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:36, 14 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' reviews the controversy that erupted in San Francisco in 2011.
			==Video==
			<br>
	<vimeo>39659297</vimeo>		<vimeo>39659297</vimeo>
			<br>
			Throughout history, [[circumcision]] has been a sensitive subject. The debate over whether to cut flared most recently during the summer of 2011, when a group of activists (“[[intactivists]]”) collected more than 11,000 signatures to propose a measure to ban circumcision in San Francisco. The initiative would have made the practice a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and up to one year in jail. It offered no exemptions for religious customs. The proposed ban outraged Muslim and Jewish communities alike, uniting them around a proposal to protect their right to perform a ritual they have observed for millennia. While the measure failed to make the ballot, it ignited many conversations on a subject rarely addressed.

	~~Throughout history~~, ~~circumcision has been a sensitive subject~~. ~~The debate over whether~~ to ~~cut flared most recently during~~ the ~~summer of 2011~~, ~~when a group of activists (“~~[[~~intactivists~~]]”) ~~collected more than 11,000 signatures to propose~~ a ~~measure to ban circumcision in San Francisco. The initiative would have made the practice a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1~~,~~000~~ and ~~up to one year in jail. It offered no exemptions for~~ religious ~~customs. The proposed ban outraged Muslim~~ and Jewish communities alike, uniting them around a proposal to protect their right to perform a ritual they have observed for millennia. While the measure failed to make the ballot, it ignited many conversations on ~~a subject rarely addressed~~.		(UN)CUT explores circumcision’s medical, sexual and religious complexities against the backdrop of San Francisco’s latest ban controversy. Interviewing key players on both sides of the issue, the documentary illuminates opposing perspectives to inspire more dialogue and understanding. While circumcision remains mainstream in the [[United States]], trends are shifting and the [[intactivist]] movement is gaining momentum. (UN)CUT takes a personal, and sometimes humorous look at what happens when religious freedoms intersect with modern law and collide head-on with infant rights.

	(UN)CUT explores circumcision’s medical, sexual and religious complexities against the backdrop of San Francisco’s latest ban controversy. Interviewing key players on both sides of the issue, the documentary illuminates opposing perspectives to inspire more dialogue and understanding. While circumcision remains mainstream in the United States, trends are shifting and the intactivist movement is gaining momentum. (UN)CUT takes a personal, and sometimes humorous look at what happens when religious freedoms intersect with modern law and collide head-on with infant rights.		{{LINKS}}

	~~{{LINKS}}~~
	* http://uncutdocumentary.com/
	* [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/uncut-jeffrey-braverman-circumcision-movie_n_1237749.html '(UN)CUT': Jeffrey Braverman's Film To Explore Circumcision's Complexities]<br><br>		* [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/uncut-jeffrey-braverman-circumcision-movie_n_1237749.html '(UN)CUT': Jeffrey Braverman's Film To Explore Circumcision's Complexities]<br><br>

Line 15:		Line 18:
	[[Category:Film]]		[[Category:Film]]
	[[Category:Film about circumcision and intactivism]]		[[Category:Film about circumcision and intactivism]]

			[[Category:USA]]

	[[Category:From IntactWiki]]		[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

	[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]		[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]

WikiAdmin: changed category title

2021-04-21T12:51:21Z

changed category title

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:51, 21 April 2021
Line 14:		Line 14:

	[[Category:Film]]		[[Category:Film]]
	[[Category:~~Films~~ about circumcision and intactivism]]		[[Category:Film about circumcision and intactivism]]

	[[Category:From IntactWiki]]		[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

	[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]		[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]

WikiAdmin: add interlanguage link

2019-10-12T13:10:39Z

add interlanguage link

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 12 October 2019
Line 17:		Line 17:

	[[Category:From IntactWiki]]		[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

			[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]

WikiAdmin: {{DEFAULTSORT:Uncut Jeffrey Braverman}}

2019-10-10T13:16:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:16, 10 October 2019
Line 10:		Line 10:

	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

			{{DEFAULTSORT:Uncut Jeffrey Braverman}}

	[[Category:Film]]		[[Category:Film]]

WikiAdmin at 16:12, 19 August 2019

2019-08-19T16:12:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:12, 19 August 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<~~video type="~~vimeo">39659297</~~video~~>		<vimeo>39659297</vimeo>

	Throughout history, circumcision has been a sensitive subject. The debate over whether to cut flared most recently during the summer of 2011, when a group of activists (“[[intactivists]]”) collected more than 11,000 signatures to propose a measure to ban circumcision in San Francisco. The initiative would have made the practice a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and up to one year in jail. It offered no exemptions for religious customs. The proposed ban outraged Muslim and Jewish communities alike, uniting them around a proposal to protect their right to perform a ritual they have observed for millennia. While the measure failed to make the ballot, it ignited many conversations on a subject rarely addressed.		Throughout history, circumcision has been a sensitive subject. The debate over whether to cut flared most recently during the summer of 2011, when a group of activists (“[[intactivists]]”) collected more than 11,000 signatures to propose a measure to ban circumcision in San Francisco. The initiative would have made the practice a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and up to one year in jail. It offered no exemptions for religious customs. The proposed ban outraged Muslim and Jewish communities alike, uniting them around a proposal to protect their right to perform a ritual they have observed for millennia. While the measure failed to make the ballot, it ignited many conversations on a subject rarely addressed.

WikiAdmin: Created page with " Throughout history, circumcision has been a sensitive subject. The debate over whether to cut flared most recently during the summer of 2..."

2019-08-19T15:48:48Z

Created page with "<video type="vimeo">39659297</video> Throughout history, circumcision has been a sensitive subject. The debate over whether to cut flared most recently during the summer of 2..."

New page

<video type="vimeo">39659297</video>

Throughout history, circumcision has been a sensitive subject. The debate over whether to cut flared most recently during the summer of 2011, when a group of activists (“[[intactivists]]”) collected more than 11,000 signatures to propose a measure to ban circumcision in San Francisco. The initiative would have made the practice a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and up to one year in jail. It offered no exemptions for religious customs. The proposed ban outraged Muslim and Jewish communities alike, uniting them around a proposal to protect their right to perform a ritual they have observed for millennia. While the measure failed to make the ballot, it ignited many conversations on a subject rarely addressed.

(UN)CUT explores circumcision’s medical, sexual and religious complexities against the backdrop of San Francisco’s latest ban controversy. Interviewing key players on both sides of the issue, the documentary illuminates opposing perspectives to inspire more dialogue and understanding. While circumcision remains mainstream in the United States, trends are shifting and the intactivist movement is gaining momentum. (UN)CUT takes a personal, and sometimes humorous look at what happens when religious freedoms intersect with modern law and collide head-on with infant rights.

{{LINKS}}
* http://uncutdocumentary.com/
* [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/uncut-jeffrey-braverman-circumcision-movie_n_1237749.html '(UN)CUT': Jeffrey Braverman's Film To Explore Circumcision's Complexities]<br><br>

{{REF}}

[[Category:Film]]
[[Category:Films about circumcision and intactivism]]

[[Category:From IntactWiki]]