Brad Sherman - Revision history

WikiModEn2: /* Pro-Circumcision Bill */ Wikify; Add link in SEEALSO section.

2024-05-06T20:58:18Z

Pro-Circumcision Bill: Wikify; Add link in SEEALSO section.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 6 May 2024
Line 62:		Line 62:

	== Pro-Circumcision Bill ==		== Pro-Circumcision Bill ==
	Sherman introduced a bill entitled "Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011". This bill was designed to stop a San Francisco bill from reaching the voters that would ban infant circumcision without immediate medical necessity.<ref name="shermans bill"/> The proposed bill attempts to dictate the medical validity of circumcision, declaring that:		Sherman introduced a bill entitled "Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011". This bill was designed to stop a San Francisco bill from reaching the voters that would ban infant [[circumcision]] without immediate medical necessity.<ref name="shermans bill"/> The proposed bill attempts to dictate the medical validity of circumcision, declaring that:

	{{Citation		{{Citation
	\|Title=		\|Title=
	\|Text=Male circumcision carries significant medical benefits, including lower risk of sexually-transmitted diseases, certain kinds of infection, and overall improved hygiene.		\|Text=Male circumcision carries significant medical benefits, including lower risk of sexually-transmitted diseases, certain kinds of [[infection]], and overall improved hygiene.
	\|Author=Sherman, B.		\|Author=Sherman, B.
	\|Source=		\|Source=
Line 91:		Line 91:
	By codifying statements that no medical organization in and outside of the [[United States]] has ever dared to make, Sherman's bill takes an unfounded position against the best medical authorities of the West, within and outside of the United States. The trend of opinion on [[Routine Infant Circumcision\| routine male circumcision]] is so overwhelmingly negative in industrialized nations that it would be quite surprising were male [[circumcision]] to be recommended in the United States. No respected U.S. based medical board recommends circumcision for U.S. infants, not even in the name of [[HIV]] prevention. They all point to the risks, and they all state that there is no convincing evidence that the benefits outweigh these risks.		By codifying statements that no medical organization in and outside of the [[United States]] has ever dared to make, Sherman's bill takes an unfounded position against the best medical authorities of the West, within and outside of the United States. The trend of opinion on [[Routine Infant Circumcision\| routine male circumcision]] is so overwhelmingly negative in industrialized nations that it would be quite surprising were male [[circumcision]] to be recommended in the United States. No respected U.S. based medical board recommends circumcision for U.S. infants, not even in the name of [[HIV]] prevention. They all point to the risks, and they all state that there is no convincing evidence that the benefits outweigh these risks.

	Regarding hygiene, according the "Circumcision Policy Statement" produced by the "Task Force on Circumcision" appointed by the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], which was published in ''Pediatrics'' in 1999 and reaffirmed on September 1, 2005, "there is little evidence to affirm the association between circumcision status and optimal penile hygiene".<ref>{{REFjournal		Regarding hygiene, according the "[https://www.cirp.org/library/statements/aap1999/ Circumcision Policy Statement]" produced by the "Task Force on Circumcision" appointed by the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], which was published in ''Pediatrics'' in 1999 and reaffirmed on September 1, 2005, "there is little evidence to affirm the association between circumcision status and optimal penile hygiene".<ref>{{REFjournal
	\|title=American Academy of Pediatrics: Circumcision Policy Statement; Task Force on Circumcision		\|title=American Academy of Pediatrics: Circumcision Policy Statement; Task Force on Circumcision
	\|journal=Pediatrics		\|journal=Pediatrics
Line 230:		Line 230:

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}
			* [[Abrahamic covenant]]
			* [[Human rights]]
	* [[Mike Gatto]] — Pro-circumcision California Representative (worked for Sherman for 5 years).		* [[Mike Gatto]] — Pro-circumcision California Representative (worked for Sherman for 5 years).
	* [[User:Mazzera/Committee for Parental Choice and Religious Freedom\|Committee for ''Parental Choice'' and ''Religious Freedom'']] — A group dedicated to California's pro-circumcision bill.		* [[User:Mazzera/Committee for Parental Choice and Religious Freedom\|Committee for ''Parental Choice'' and ''Religious Freedom'']] — A group dedicated to California's pro-circumcision bill.
	* [[Daniel Halperin]] — Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.		* [[Daniel Halperin]] — Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.
	* [[Edgar J. Schoen]] — Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.		* [[Edgar J. Schoen]] — Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.
	* [[Abrahamic covenant]]
	* [[Israel]]		* [[Israel]]
			* [[United States of America]]
	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
	* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ltNYrScjc Brad Sherman Loses His Cool With A Constituent] — A questioner asks Sherman about his conflicts of interest.		* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ltNYrScjc Brad Sherman Loses His Cool With A Constituent] — A questioner asks Sherman about his conflicts of interest.

WikiModEn2: Wikify.

2024-05-06T20:43:26Z

Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 6 May 2024
Line 27:		Line 27:
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|accessdate=2011-09-17		\|accessdate=2011-09-17
	}}</ref> In 2011, Sherman introduced the so-called "[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h2400: Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011]" (H.R. 2400) in the House of Representatives, the first pro-[[circumcision]] bill in the history of the United States of America.<ref name="shermans bill">{{REFweb		}}</ref> In 2011, Sherman introduced the so-called "[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h2400: Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011]" (H.R. 2400) in the House of Representatives, the first pro-[[circumcision]] bill in the history of the [[United States of America]].<ref name="shermans bill">{{REFweb
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|url=http://bradsherman.house.gov/2011/06/sherman-to-introduce-bill-to-protect-male-circumcision.shtml		\|url=http://bradsherman.house.gov/2011/06/sherman-to-introduce-bill-to-protect-male-circumcision.shtml
Line 89:		Line 89:
	}}		}}

	By codifying statements that no medical organization in and outside of the United States has ever dared to make, Sherman's bill takes an unfounded position against the best medical authorities of the West, within and outside of the United States. The trend of opinion on routine male circumcision is so overwhelmingly negative in industrialized nations that it would be quite surprising were male circumcision to be recommended in the United States. No respected U.S. based medical board recommends circumcision for U.S. infants, not even in the name of [[HIV]] prevention. They all point to the risks, and they all state that there is no convincing evidence that the benefits outweigh these risks.		By codifying statements that no medical organization in and outside of the [[United States]] has ever dared to make, Sherman's bill takes an unfounded position against the best medical authorities of the West, within and outside of the United States. The trend of opinion on [[Routine Infant Circumcision\| routine male circumcision]] is so overwhelmingly negative in industrialized nations that it would be quite surprising were male [[circumcision]] to be recommended in the United States. No respected U.S. based medical board recommends circumcision for U.S. infants, not even in the name of [[HIV]] prevention. They all point to the risks, and they all state that there is no convincing evidence that the benefits outweigh these risks.

	Regarding hygiene, according the "Circumcision Policy Statement" produced by the "Task Force on Circumcision" appointed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which was published in Pediatrics in 1999 and reaffirmed on September 1, 2005, "there is little evidence to affirm the association between circumcision status and optimal penile hygiene".<ref>{{REFjournal		Regarding hygiene, according the "Circumcision Policy Statement" produced by the "Task Force on Circumcision" appointed by the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], which was published in ''Pediatrics'' in 1999 and reaffirmed on September 1, 2005, "there is little evidence to affirm the association between circumcision status and optimal penile hygiene".<ref>{{REFjournal
	\|title=American Academy of Pediatrics: Circumcision Policy Statement; Task Force on Circumcision		\|title=American Academy of Pediatrics: Circumcision Policy Statement; Task Force on Circumcision
	\|journal=Pediatrics		\|journal=Pediatrics
Line 235:		Line 235:
	* [[Edgar J. Schoen]] — Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.		* [[Edgar J. Schoen]] — Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.
	* [[Abrahamic covenant]]		* [[Abrahamic covenant]]
			* [[Israel]]
	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
	* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ltNYrScjc Brad Sherman Loses His Cool With A Constituent] — A questioner asks Sherman about his conflicts of interest.		* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ltNYrScjc Brad Sherman Loses His Cool With A Constituent] — A questioner asks Sherman about his conflicts of interest.

WikiModEn2: Formatting.

2022-11-06T23:33:36Z

Formatting.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:33, 6 November 2022
Line 230:		Line 230:

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}
	* [[Mike Gatto]] -- Pro-circumcision California Representative (worked for Sherman for 5 years).		* [[Mike Gatto]] — Pro-circumcision California Representative (worked for Sherman for 5 years).
	* [[User:Mazzera/Committee for Parental Choice and Religious Freedom\|Committee for ''Parental Choice'' and ''Religious Freedom'']] -- A group dedicated to California's pro-circumcision bill.		* [[User:Mazzera/Committee for Parental Choice and Religious Freedom\|Committee for ''Parental Choice'' and ''Religious Freedom'']] — A group dedicated to California's pro-circumcision bill.
	* [[Daniel Halperin]] -- Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.		* [[Daniel Halperin]] — Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.
	* [[Edgar J. Schoen]] -- Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.		* [[Edgar J. Schoen]] — Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.
	* [[Abrahamic covenant]]		* [[Abrahamic covenant]]
	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
	* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ltNYrScjc Brad Sherman Loses His Cool With A Constituent] -- A questioner asks Sherman about his conflicts of interest.		* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ltNYrScjc Brad Sherman Loses His Cool With A Constituent] — A questioner asks Sherman about his conflicts of interest.

	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

WikiAdmin: wikify Kilmarx

2022-09-13T06:56:15Z

wikify Kilmarx

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:56, 13 September 2022
Line 135:		Line 135:
	\|first4=Peter H.		\|first4=Peter H.
	\|init4=PH		\|init4=PH
			\|author4-link=Peter Kilmarx
	\|last5=Chen		\|last5=Chen
	\|first5=Robert T.		\|first5=Robert T.

WikiModEn2: Add link in SEEALSO section; Wikify.

2022-07-18T10:59:52Z

Add link in SEEALSO section; Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:59, 18 July 2022
Line 27:		Line 27:
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|accessdate=2011-09-17		\|accessdate=2011-09-17
	}}</ref> In 2011, Sherman introduced the so-called "[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h2400: Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011]" (H.R. 2400) in the House of Representatives, the first pro-circumcision bill in the history of the United States of America.<ref name="shermans bill">{{REFweb		}}</ref> In 2011, Sherman introduced the so-called "[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h2400: Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011]" (H.R. 2400) in the House of Representatives, the first pro-[[circumcision]] bill in the history of the United States of America.<ref name="shermans bill">{{REFweb
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|url=http://bradsherman.house.gov/2011/06/sherman-to-introduce-bill-to-protect-male-circumcision.shtml		\|url=http://bradsherman.house.gov/2011/06/sherman-to-introduce-bill-to-protect-male-circumcision.shtml
Line 233:		Line 233:
	* [[Daniel Halperin]] -- Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.		* [[Daniel Halperin]] -- Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.
	* [[Edgar J. Schoen]] -- Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.		* [[Edgar J. Schoen]] -- Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.
			* [[Abrahamic covenant]]
	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
	* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ltNYrScjc Brad Sherman Loses His Cool With A Constituent] -- A questioner asks Sherman about his conflicts of interest.		* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ltNYrScjc Brad Sherman Loses His Cool With A Constituent] -- A questioner asks Sherman about his conflicts of interest.

WikiAdmin: wikify AIDS

2021-12-01T11:30:22Z

wikify AIDS

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:30, 1 December 2021
Line 150:		Line 150:
	\|quote=Incidence of newborn male circumcision decreased...		\|quote=Incidence of newborn male circumcision decreased...
	\|accessdate=2011-09-24		\|accessdate=2011-09-24
	}}</ref> At AIDS 2010, Vienna, the CDC had announced that the circumcision rate dropped to 32.5% in 2009.<ref>{{REFnews		}}</ref> At [[AIDS]] 2010, Vienna, the CDC had announced that the circumcision rate dropped to 32.5% in 2009.<ref>{{REFnews
	\|last=Rabin		\|last=Rabin
	\|first=Roni Caryn		\|first=Roni Caryn

WikiAdmin: adjusted wiki link

2021-11-28T11:07:05Z

adjusted wiki link

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 28 November 2021
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\| data2 = [[Mike Gatto]]		\| data2 = [[Mike Gatto]]
	\| data3 = [[Daniel Halperin]]		\| data3 = [[Daniel Halperin]]
	\| data4 = [[Edgar Schoen]]		\| data4 = [[Edgar J. Schoen]]
	\| belowstyle = background:#d2d2d2;		\| belowstyle = background:#d2d2d2;
	\| below =		\| below =

WikiAdmin: wikify HIV

2021-11-24T15:21:17Z

wikify HIV

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 24 November 2021
Line 89:		Line 89:
	}}		}}

	By codifying statements that no medical organization in and outside of the United States has ever dared to make, Sherman's bill takes an unfounded position against the best medical authorities of the West, within and outside of the United States. The trend of opinion on routine male circumcision is so overwhelmingly negative in industrialized nations that it would be quite surprising were male circumcision to be recommended in the United States. No respected U.S. based medical board recommends circumcision for U.S. infants, not even in the name of HIV prevention. They all point to the risks, and they all state that there is no convincing evidence that the benefits outweigh these risks.		By codifying statements that no medical organization in and outside of the United States has ever dared to make, Sherman's bill takes an unfounded position against the best medical authorities of the West, within and outside of the United States. The trend of opinion on routine male circumcision is so overwhelmingly negative in industrialized nations that it would be quite surprising were male circumcision to be recommended in the United States. No respected U.S. based medical board recommends circumcision for U.S. infants, not even in the name of [[HIV]] prevention. They all point to the risks, and they all state that there is no convincing evidence that the benefits outweigh these risks.

	Regarding hygiene, according the "Circumcision Policy Statement" produced by the "Task Force on Circumcision" appointed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which was published in Pediatrics in 1999 and reaffirmed on September 1, 2005, "there is little evidence to affirm the association between circumcision status and optimal penile hygiene".<ref>{{REFjournal		Regarding hygiene, according the "Circumcision Policy Statement" produced by the "Task Force on Circumcision" appointed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which was published in Pediatrics in 1999 and reaffirmed on September 1, 2005, "there is little evidence to affirm the association between circumcision status and optimal penile hygiene".<ref>{{REFjournal

WikiAdmin: adjusted REFjournal

2020-12-30T12:25:02Z

adjusted REFjournal

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 30 December 2020
Line 125:		Line 125:
	\|last=Bcheraoui		\|last=Bcheraoui
	\|first=Charbel El		\|first=Charbel El
			\|init=CE
			\|last2=Zhang
	\|first2=Xinjian		\|first2=Xinjian
	\|~~last2~~=~~Zhang~~		\|init2=X
			\|last3=Shinde
	\|first3=Sanjyot		\|first3=Sanjyot
	\|~~last3~~=~~Shinde~~		\|init3=S
			\|last4=Kilmarx
	\|first4=Peter H.		\|first4=Peter H.
	\|~~last4~~=~~Kilmarx~~		\|init4=PH
			\|last5=Chen
	\|first5=Robert T.		\|first5=Robert T.
	\|~~last5~~=~~Chen~~		\|init5=RT
			\|last6=Owings
	\|first6=Maria		\|first6=Maria
	\|~~last6~~=~~Owings~~		\|init6=M
	\|date=2011-09-02		\|date=2011-09-02
	\|title=Trends in In-Hospital Newborn Male Circumcision --- United States, 1999--2010		\|title=Trends in In-Hospital Newborn Male Circumcision - United States, 1999-2010
	\|journal=Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)		\|journal=Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)
	\|volume=60		\|volume=60

WikiAdmin at 12:38, 28 March 2020

2020-03-28T12:38:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 28 March 2020
Line 234:		Line 234:

	{{DEFAULTSORT:Sherman, Brad}}		{{DEFAULTSORT:Sherman, Brad}}

			[[Category:Person]]
			[[Category:Male]]

	[[Category:Islam]]		[[Category:Islam]]
			[[Category:Jewish]]
	[[Category:Judaism]]		[[Category:Judaism]]
	[[Category:Politician]]		[[Category:Politician]]

			[[Category:USA]]

	[[Category:From CircLeaks]]		[[Category:From CircLeaks]]
	[[Category:From IntactWiki]]		[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

	~~[[Category:Male]]~~
	~~[[Category:People]]~~

	[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]		[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]