Daniel J. Krimsky - Revision history

WikiModEn2: Add SEEALSO section.

2024-04-29T16:46:08Z

Add SEEALSO section.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 29 April 2024
Line 22:		Line 22:

	== Complaint ==		== Complaint ==
	The complaint argued that Daniel J. Krimsky is not a doctor or medical practitioner. He presented himself as a "certified" mohel, in spite of not having the skill or training to perform [[Brit Milah\| circumcisions]]. Krimsky's attempt at hiding the damage was only uncovered by a physician present in the event.		The complaint argued that Daniel J. Krimsky is not a doctor or medical practitioner. He presented himself as a "certified" [[mohel]], in spite of not having the skill or training to perform [[Brit Milah\| circumcisions]]. Krimsky's attempt at hiding the damage was only uncovered by a physician present in the event.

	[[Mogen]] was also named a defendant in this case for product liability, failure to warn and breach of warranty. The instructional brochure included with the clamp falsely stated that "No injury to the [[glans]] is possible because of beveled under edge and narrow aperture".<ref>{{REFweb		[[Mogen]] was also named a defendant in this case for product liability, failure to warn and breach of warranty. The instructional brochure included with the clamp falsely stated that "No injury to the [[glans]] is possible because of beveled under edge and narrow aperture".<ref>{{REFweb
Line 53:		Line 53:
	\|accessdate=2012-10-14		\|accessdate=2012-10-14
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>
			{{SEEALSO}}
			* [[Complication]]
			* [[United States of America]]
	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

Line 60:		Line 62:
	[[Category:Person]]		[[Category:Person]]
	[[Category:Male]]		[[Category:Male]]
			[[Category:Jewish]]

	[[Category:Mohel]]		[[Category:Mohel]]
	[[Category:Perpetrator]]		[[Category:Perpetrator]]
	~~[[Category:Rabbi]]~~

	[[Category:Lawsuit]]		[[Category:Lawsuit]]

WikiModEn2: /* Complaint */ Wikify.

2022-11-02T23:01:45Z

Complaint: Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 2 November 2022
Line 22:		Line 22:

	== Complaint ==		== Complaint ==
	The complaint argued that Daniel J. Krimsky is not a doctor or medical practitioner. He presented himself as a "certified" mohel, in spite of not having the skill or training to perform circumcisions. Krimsky's attempt at hiding the damage was only uncovered by a physician present in the event.		The complaint argued that Daniel J. Krimsky is not a doctor or medical practitioner. He presented himself as a "certified" mohel, in spite of not having the skill or training to perform [[Brit Milah\| circumcisions]]. Krimsky's attempt at hiding the damage was only uncovered by a physician present in the event.

	Mogen was also named a defendant in this case for product liability, failure to warn and breach of warranty. The instructional brochure included with the clamp falsely stated that "No injury to the glans is possible because of beveled under edge and narrow aperture".<ref>{{REFweb		[[Mogen]] was also named a defendant in this case for product liability, failure to warn and breach of warranty. The instructional brochure included with the clamp falsely stated that "No injury to the [[glans]] is possible because of beveled under edge and narrow aperture".<ref>{{REFweb
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/circumcisedeo.pdf		\|url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/circumcisedeo.pdf
Line 36:		Line 36:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	Under general anesthesia, doctors re-covered the shaft with the [[skin]] remaining in the specimen and re-anastomosed the [[glans penis]] using a micro-surgical technique. However, the operation was not a complete success. Over the next two weeks, part of the glans became [[Necrosis\| necrotic]] and black and was removed, including most of the [[shaft skin\|skin of the shaft]]. As a result, L.G. no longer has a glans penis. When L.G. is older, it may be necessary to release the penile [[shaft skin]] and perform a [[skin]] graft in order for L.G. to have the best penile function possible under the circumstances. Although doctors project that L.G. will be able to have sexual intercourse and reproduce, the sexual experience will not be the same as if he had a glans penis.<ref>{{REFweb		Under general anesthesia, doctors re-covered the shaft with the [[skin]] remaining in the specimen and re-anastomosed the [[glans penis]] using a micro-surgical technique. However, the operation was not a complete success. Over the next two weeks, part of the glans became [[Necrosis\| necrotic]] and black and was removed, including most of the [[shaft skin\|skin of the shaft]]. As a result, L.G. no longer has a glans penis. When L.G. is older, it may be necessary to release the penile [[shaft skin]] and perform a [[skin]] graft in order for L.G. to have the best penile function possible under the circumstances. Although doctors project that L.G. will be able to have sexual intercourse and reproduce, the sexual experience will not be the same as if he had a [[glans penis]].<ref>{{REFweb
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|url=http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20100625_0000608.ENY.htm/qx		\|url=http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20100625_0000608.ENY.htm/qx
Line 48:		Line 48:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein ordered that Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York be forced to pay $10.8 million in compensatory and punitive damages to L. G. and his parents, Dror Gerges and Sivan Gerges, in 2010. It is unknown if L. G. or his parents will ever collect on the judgement as Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York was already in default in 2010, after having been forced to pay a $7.5 million to a plaintiff from a 2007 lawsuit. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money. The plaintiffs' attorney was [[David J. Llewellyn]].<ref>{{REFweb		U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein ordered that [[Mogen\| Mogen Circumcision Instruments]] of New York be forced to pay $10.8 million in compensatory and punitive damages to L. G. and his parents, Dror Gerges and Sivan Gerges, in 2010. It is unknown if L. G. or his parents will ever collect on the judgement as Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York was already in default in 2010, after having been forced to pay a $7.5 million to a plaintiff from a 2007 lawsuit. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money. The plaintiffs' attorney was [[David J. Llewellyn]].<ref>{{REFweb
	\|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MurasakiSunshine#Lawsuits_with_the_Mogen_clamp		\|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MurasakiSunshine#Lawsuits_with_the_Mogen_clamp
	\|title=Lawsuits with the Mogen clamp		\|title=Lawsuits with the Mogen clamp

WikiAdmin: USA

2022-07-28T11:49:05Z

USA

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 28 July 2022
Line 66:		Line 66:

	[[Category:Lawsuit]]		[[Category:Lawsuit]]

			[[Category:USA]]

	[[Category:From CircLeaks]]		[[Category:From CircLeaks]]

WikiModEn2: Wikify.

2022-07-01T17:08:33Z

Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:08, 1 July 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|}		\|}

	'''Daniel J. Krimsky''' is a [[~~Mohel~~]] in the United States. In 2004 he amputated the glans of the penis of an 8 ~~days~~ old baby (known as LG) during a bris in Florida and attempted to conceal the damage. He was using a Mogen Clamp. The baby did not receive emergency care in time and suffered permanent disfigurement and loss of sexual function. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money.<ref>{{REFweb		'''Daniel J. Krimsky''' is a [[mohel]] in the United States. In 2004 he amputated the [[glans]] of the [[penis]] of an 8-day=old baby (known as LG) during a bris in Florida and attempted to conceal the damage. He was using a [[Mogen\| Mogen Clamp]]. The baby did not receive emergency care in time and suffered permanent disfigurement and loss of sexual function. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money.<ref>{{REFweb
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2006/11/dont_let_your_mohel_use_a_moge_1.html		\|url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2006/11/dont_let_your_mohel_use_a_moge_1.html
Line 24:		Line 24:
	The complaint argued that Daniel J. Krimsky is not a doctor or medical practitioner. He presented himself as a "certified" mohel, in spite of not having the skill or training to perform circumcisions. Krimsky's attempt at hiding the damage was only uncovered by a physician present in the event.		The complaint argued that Daniel J. Krimsky is not a doctor or medical practitioner. He presented himself as a "certified" mohel, in spite of not having the skill or training to perform circumcisions. Krimsky's attempt at hiding the damage was only uncovered by a physician present in the event.

	Mogen was also named a defendant in this case for product liability, failure to warn and breach of warranty. The instructional brochure included with the clamp falsely stated that "No injury to the glans is possible because of beveled under edge and narrow ~~apperture~~".<ref>{{REFweb		Mogen was also named a defendant in this case for product liability, failure to warn and breach of warranty. The instructional brochure included with the clamp falsely stated that "No injury to the glans is possible because of beveled under edge and narrow aperture".<ref>{{REFweb
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/circumcisedeo.pdf		\|url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/circumcisedeo.pdf
Line 36:		Line 36:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	Under general anesthesia, doctors re-covered the shaft with the [[skin]] remaining in the specimen and re-anastomosed the glans penis using a micro-surgical technique. However, the operation was not a complete success. Over the next two weeks, part of the glans became necrotic and black and was removed, including most of the [[shaft skin\|skin of the shaft]]. As a result, L.G. no longer has a glans penis. When L.G. is older, it may be necessary to release the penile [[shaft skin]] and perform a [[skin]] graft in order for L.G. to have the best penile function possible under the circumstances. Although doctors project that L.G. will be able to have sexual intercourse and reproduce, the sexual experience will not be the same as if he had a glans penis.<ref>{{REFweb		Under general anesthesia, doctors re-covered the shaft with the [[skin]] remaining in the specimen and re-anastomosed the [[glans penis]] using a micro-surgical technique. However, the operation was not a complete success. Over the next two weeks, part of the glans became [[Necrosis\| necrotic]] and black and was removed, including most of the [[shaft skin\|skin of the shaft]]. As a result, L.G. no longer has a glans penis. When L.G. is older, it may be necessary to release the penile [[shaft skin]] and perform a [[skin]] graft in order for L.G. to have the best penile function possible under the circumstances. Although doctors project that L.G. will be able to have sexual intercourse and reproduce, the sexual experience will not be the same as if he had a glans penis.<ref>{{REFweb
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|url=http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20100625_0000608.ENY.htm/qx		\|url=http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20100625_0000608.ENY.htm/qx
Line 48:		Line 48:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein ordered that Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York be forced to pay $10.8 million in compensatory and punitive damages to L. G. and his parents, Dror Gerges and Sivan Gerges, in 2010. It is unknown if L. G. or his parents will ever collect on the judgement as Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York was already in default in 2010, after having been forced to pay a $7.5 million to a plaintiff from a 2007 lawsuit. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money. The plaintiffs' attorney was David J. Llewellyn.<ref>{{REFweb		U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein ordered that Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York be forced to pay $10.8 million in compensatory and punitive damages to L. G. and his parents, Dror Gerges and Sivan Gerges, in 2010. It is unknown if L. G. or his parents will ever collect on the judgement as Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York was already in default in 2010, after having been forced to pay a $7.5 million to a plaintiff from a 2007 lawsuit. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money. The plaintiffs' attorney was [[David J. Llewellyn]].<ref>{{REFweb
	\|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MurasakiSunshine#Lawsuits_with_the_Mogen_clamp		\|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MurasakiSunshine#Lawsuits_with_the_Mogen_clamp
	\|title=Lawsuits with the Mogen clamp		\|title=Lawsuits with the Mogen clamp

WikiAdmin: wikify shaft skin

2021-12-28T09:41:16Z

wikify shaft skin

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:41, 28 December 2021
Line 36:		Line 36:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	Under general anesthesia, doctors re-covered the shaft with the [[skin]] remaining in the specimen and re-anastomosed the glans penis using a micro-surgical technique. However, the operation was not a complete success. Over the next two weeks, part of the glans became necrotic and black and was removed, including most of the [[skin]] of the shaft. As a result, L.G. no longer has a glans penis. When L.G. is older, it may be necessary to release the penile ~~shaft~~ [[skin]] and perform a [[skin]] graft in order for L.G. to have the best penile function possible under the circumstances. Although doctors project that L.G. will be able to have sexual intercourse and reproduce, the sexual experience will not be the same as if he had a glans penis.<ref>{{REFweb		Under general anesthesia, doctors re-covered the shaft with the [[skin]] remaining in the specimen and re-anastomosed the glans penis using a micro-surgical technique. However, the operation was not a complete success. Over the next two weeks, part of the glans became necrotic and black and was removed, including most of the [[shaft skin\|skin of the shaft]]. As a result, L.G. no longer has a glans penis. When L.G. is older, it may be necessary to release the penile [[shaft skin]] and perform a [[skin]] graft in order for L.G. to have the best penile function possible under the circumstances. Although doctors project that L.G. will be able to have sexual intercourse and reproduce, the sexual experience will not be the same as if he had a glans penis.<ref>{{REFweb
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|url=http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20100625_0000608.ENY.htm/qx		\|url=http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20100625_0000608.ENY.htm/qx

WikiAdmin: wikify skin

2021-12-27T14:43:39Z

wikify skin

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 27 December 2021
Line 36:		Line 36:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	Under general anesthesia, doctors re-covered the shaft with the skin remaining in the specimen and re-anastomosed the glans penis using a micro-surgical technique. However, the operation was not a complete success. Over the next two weeks, part of the glans became necrotic and black and was removed, including most of the skin of the shaft. As a result, L.G. no longer has a glans penis. When L.G. is older, it may be necessary to release the penile shaft skin and perform a skin graft in order for L.G. to have the best penile function possible under the circumstances. Although doctors project that L.G. will be able to have sexual intercourse and reproduce, the sexual experience will not be the same as if he had a glans penis.<ref>{{REFweb		Under general anesthesia, doctors re-covered the shaft with the [[skin]] remaining in the specimen and re-anastomosed the glans penis using a micro-surgical technique. However, the operation was not a complete success. Over the next two weeks, part of the glans became necrotic and black and was removed, including most of the [[skin]] of the shaft. As a result, L.G. no longer has a glans penis. When L.G. is older, it may be necessary to release the penile shaft [[skin]] and perform a [[skin]] graft in order for L.G. to have the best penile function possible under the circumstances. Although doctors project that L.G. will be able to have sexual intercourse and reproduce, the sexual experience will not be the same as if he had a glans penis.<ref>{{REFweb
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|url=http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20100625_0000608.ENY.htm/qx		\|url=http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20100625_0000608.ENY.htm/qx

WikiAdmin: added category

2021-10-14T11:40:42Z

added category

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:40, 14 October 2021
Line 63:		Line 63:
	[[Category:Mohel]]		[[Category:Mohel]]
	[[Category:Perpetrator]]		[[Category:Perpetrator]]
			[[Category:Rabbi]]

	[[Category:Lawsuit]]		[[Category:Lawsuit]]

WikiAdmin: added Category:Lawsuit

2021-05-01T16:38:14Z

added Category:Lawsuit

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:38, 1 May 2021
Line 63:		Line 63:
	[[Category:Mohel]]		[[Category:Mohel]]
	[[Category:Perpetrator]]		[[Category:Perpetrator]]

			[[Category:Lawsuit]]

	[[Category:From CircLeaks]]		[[Category:From CircLeaks]]

WikiAdmin at 11:56, 28 March 2020

2020-03-28T11:56:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:56, 28 March 2020
Line 49:		Line 49:

	U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein ordered that Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York be forced to pay $10.8 million in compensatory and punitive damages to L. G. and his parents, Dror Gerges and Sivan Gerges, in 2010. It is unknown if L. G. or his parents will ever collect on the judgement as Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York was already in default in 2010, after having been forced to pay a $7.5 million to a plaintiff from a 2007 lawsuit. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money. The plaintiffs' attorney was David J. Llewellyn.<ref>{{REFweb		U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein ordered that Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York be forced to pay $10.8 million in compensatory and punitive damages to L. G. and his parents, Dror Gerges and Sivan Gerges, in 2010. It is unknown if L. G. or his parents will ever collect on the judgement as Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York was already in default in 2010, after having been forced to pay a $7.5 million to a plaintiff from a 2007 lawsuit. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money. The plaintiffs' attorney was David J. Llewellyn.<ref>{{REFweb
	~~\|quote=~~
	\|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MurasakiSunshine#Lawsuits_with_the_Mogen_clamp		\|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MurasakiSunshine#Lawsuits_with_the_Mogen_clamp
	\|title=Lawsuits with the Mogen clamp		\|title=Lawsuits with the Mogen clamp
	~~\|last=~~
	~~\|first=~~
	~~\|publisher=~~
	~~\|website=~~
	~~\|date=~~
	\|accessdate=2012-10-14		\|accessdate=2012-10-14
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>
Line 63:		Line 57:

	{{DEFAULTSORT:Krimsky, Daniel}}		{{DEFAULTSORT:Krimsky, Daniel}}

			[[Category:Person]]
			[[Category:Male]]

	[[Category:Mohel]]		[[Category:Mohel]]
	[[Category:~~Perpetrators~~]]		[[Category:Perpetrator]]

	[[Category:From CircLeaks]]		[[Category:From CircLeaks]]
	[[Category:From IntactWiki]]		[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

	~~[[Category:Male]]~~
	~~[[Category:People]]~~

	[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]		[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]

WikiAdmin at 17:30, 26 March 2020

2020-03-26T17:30:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 26 March 2020
Line 65:		Line 65:

	[[Category:Mohel]]		[[Category:Mohel]]
	~~[[Category:People]]~~
	[[Category:Perpetrators]]		[[Category:Perpetrators]]

	[[Category:From CircLeaks]]		[[Category:From CircLeaks]]
	[[Category:From IntactWiki]]		[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

			[[Category:Male]]
			[[Category:People]]

	[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]		[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]