Double standard - Revision history

WikiAdmin: /* GREENS parliamentary group */ fixed wiki link

2022-11-30T16:55:46Z

GREENS parliamentary group: fixed wiki link

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:55, 30 November 2022
Line 19:		Line 19:
	\|date=2020-06		\|date=2020-06
	\|accessdate=2020-06-04		\|accessdate=2020-06-04
	}}</ref> that is intended to strengthen the rights of intersex/transsexuals. Among other things, it is formulated in § 3 (ban on genital-altering surgical interventions): "Parents cannot consent to a genital-altering surgical intervention on the internal or external sexual characteristics of the child. [...]" The last sentence of this paragraph has it all: "§ 1631d BGB remains unaffected." This not only leaves the discriminatory and obviously unconstitutional [[German Circumcision Act\|circumcision law]] untouched, but also the protection of intersexual and transsexual people has led to an absurdity whose legal conflict can hardly be resolved in this way. How, for example, is genital mutilation in a boy to be assessed from a legal point of view if the person concerned later decides that the classification "male" did not correspond to their feelings? According to the [[German Circumcision Act]], it might have happened legally, but not according to the [[~~GREEN~~]]N's draft self-determination law.		}}</ref> that is intended to strengthen the rights of intersex/transsexuals. Among other things, it is formulated in § 3 (ban on genital-altering surgical interventions): "Parents cannot consent to a genital-altering surgical intervention on the internal or external sexual characteristics of the child. [...]" The last sentence of this paragraph has it all: "§ 1631d BGB remains unaffected." This not only leaves the discriminatory and obviously unconstitutional [[German Circumcision Act\|circumcision law]] untouched, but also the protection of intersexual and transsexual people has led to an absurdity whose legal conflict can hardly be resolved in this way. How, for example, is genital mutilation in a boy to be assessed from a legal point of view if the person concerned later decides that the classification "male" did not correspond to their feelings? According to the [[German Circumcision Act]], it might have happened legally, but not according to the [[GREENS]]' draft self-determination law.

	A commenter on Sven Lehmann's Facebook page commented appropriately: "Especially intersexual and transsexual children are dependent on their foreskin, since this is urgently needed for later self-determined operations. [...] Whoever, like the Greens, sees gender as a freely selectable continuum, but at the same time completely binary and independent of the concrete one characteristics of the sexual organs that legalize genital mutilation makes itself completely implausible."<ref>{{REFweb		A commenter on Sven Lehmann's Facebook page commented appropriately: "Especially intersexual and transsexual children are dependent on their foreskin, since this is urgently needed for later self-determined operations. [...] Whoever, like the Greens, sees gender as a freely selectable continuum, but at the same time completely binary and independent of the concrete one characteristics of the sexual organs that legalize genital mutilation makes itself completely implausible."<ref>{{REFweb

WikiAdmin: FDP

2022-08-10T07:15:12Z

FDP

@@ Line 138: / Line 138: @@
   |accessdate=2021-06-24
 }}</ref> All of the arguments in the motion at the time would also apply to give boys the same protection. Ms. Roth does not seem to see it that way to this day (2022).
 === Central Council of Jews in Germany ===

WikiAdmin: /* Bündnis 90/Die Grünen */ Lamya Kaddor

2022-08-10T07:12:15Z

Bündnis 90/Die Grünen: Lamya Kaddor

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:12, 10 August 2022
Line 84:		Line 84:

	This self-evident and commendable message is in strong contrast to her voting behavior on the [[German Circumcision Act]] of [[2012-12-12]], where she did not care about the right to protection under the law for underage boys in Germany. "Team Britta" responds to criticism of this double standard on Facebook by deleting corresponding comments.		This self-evident and commendable message is in strong contrast to her voting behavior on the [[German Circumcision Act]] of [[2012-12-12]], where she did not care about the right to protection under the law for underage boys in Germany. "Team Britta" responds to criticism of this double standard on Facebook by deleting corresponding comments.

			==== Lamya Kaddor ====
			[[File:2018-05-14-Lamya Kaddor -hart aber fair-9018.jpg\|thumb\|100px\|Lamya Kaddor (2018)]]
			The Islamic scholar and [[GREENS]] Bundestag candidate 2021 Lamya Kaddor wrote an article on ''T-Online'' in January 2021 on the debate about the explicit anchoring of children's rights in the German Basic Law, in which she wants to emphasize children's rights, but with her comments on male rights genital mutilation in children immediately reduces their commitment to children's rights to absurdity:

			{{Citation
			\|Title=The rights of our children are in bad shape
			\|Text=It will be important to ensure that the construction of a playground does not automatically receive priority, that parents can continue to determine the development of their children and that freedom of religion is preserved. In the case of the latter, the ritual circumcision of boys in Judaism and Islam will again come into focus. Their opponents are already sharpening their feathers.

			However, since the practice, if it is carried out medically professionally and early enough, has no humiliating or even traumatizing moment, has always been part of two major world religions, does not entail any particular disadvantages and, above all, does not involve any significant counter-movement among those affected themselves, i.e among male Jews and Muslims, is challenged, its defenders will still have a good hand.
			\|Author=Lamya Kaddor
			\|Source=T-Online
			\|ref=<ref>{{REFweb
			\|url=https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/deutschland/id_89280300/pandemie-und-kinderrecht-viele-fehler-nicht-nur-wegen-corona.html
			\|title=Um die Rechte unserer Kinder ist es schlecht bestellt
			\|trans-title=The rights of our children are in bad shape
			\|language=German
			\|website=T-Online
			\|last=Kaddor
			\|first=Lamya
			\|date=2021-01-14
			\|accessdate=2021-01-22
			}}</ref>
			}}

	==== Claudia Roth ====		==== Claudia Roth ====

WikiAdmin: /* Bündnis 90/Die Grünen */ Britta Haßelmann

2022-08-10T07:09:57Z

Bündnis 90/Die Grünen: Britta Haßelmann

@@ Line 64: / Line 64: @@
   |ref=<ref>https://twitter.com/search?q=volker%20beck</ref>
 }}
 ==== Claudia Roth ====

WikiAdmin: /* Bündnis 90/Die Grünen */ GREENS parliamentary group

2022-08-10T07:07:03Z

Bündnis 90/Die Grünen: GREENS parliamentary group

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:07, 10 August 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:

	=== [[Bündnis 90/Die Grünen]] ===		=== [[Bündnis 90/Die Grünen]] ===
			==== GREENS parliamentary group ====
			In 2020, the [[GREENS]] parliamentary group, led by MdB Sven Lehmann, introduced a draft law for a so-called ''Self-Determination Act''<ref>{{REFdocument
			\|url=https://www.sven-lehmann.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GE-Selbstbestimmungsgesetz.pdf
			\|title=GE-Selbstbestimmungsgesetz-1.pdf
			\|last=Lehmann
			\|first=Sven
			\|publisher=[[GREENS]] parliamentary group
			\|format=PDF
			\|date=2020-06
			\|accessdate=2020-06-04
			}}</ref> that is intended to strengthen the rights of intersex/transsexuals. Among other things, it is formulated in § 3 (ban on genital-altering surgical interventions): "Parents cannot consent to a genital-altering surgical intervention on the internal or external sexual characteristics of the child. [...]" The last sentence of this paragraph has it all: "§ 1631d BGB remains unaffected." This not only leaves the discriminatory and obviously unconstitutional [[German Circumcision Act\|circumcision law]] untouched, but also the protection of intersexual and transsexual people has led to an absurdity whose legal conflict can hardly be resolved in this way. How, for example, is genital mutilation in a boy to be assessed from a legal point of view if the person concerned later decides that the classification "male" did not correspond to their feelings? According to the [[German Circumcision Act]], it might have happened legally, but not according to the [[GREEN]]N's draft self-determination law.

			A commenter on Sven Lehmann's Facebook page commented appropriately: "Especially intersexual and transsexual children are dependent on their foreskin, since this is urgently needed for later self-determined operations. [...] Whoever, like the Greens, sees gender as a freely selectable continuum, but at the same time completely binary and independent of the concrete one characteristics of the sexual organs that legalize genital mutilation makes itself completely implausible."<ref>{{REFweb
			\|url=https://www.facebook.com/sven.lehmann.9250/posts/10223974725339168?comment_id=10223985690173282
			\|title=comment Luisemarie Keck
			\|website=Facebook
			\|publisher=Sven Lehmann
			\|date=2020-06-04
			\|accessdate=2020-06-04
			}}</ref>

	==== [[Volker Beck]] ====		==== [[Volker Beck]] ====
	[[File:Netzregeln10-Volker-Beck.jpg\|thumb\|100px\|Beck 2010]]		[[File:Netzregeln10-Volker-Beck.jpg\|thumb\|100px\|Beck 2010]]
Line 17:		Line 38:
	\|Author=Volker Beck		\|Author=Volker Beck
	\|Source=		\|Source=
	\|ref=<ref>http://www.bildungsbasar.de/2012/10/gesucht-argumente-gegen-ein-beschneidungsverbot/</ref>		\|ref=<ref name=bildungsbasar2012>http://www.bildungsbasar.de/2012/10/gesucht-argumente-gegen-ein-beschneidungsverbot/</ref>
	}}		}}
	In the [[Circumcision Debate]] he still denies, however, that religions engage here in the rights of others and that children are at all bearers of [[human rights]]:		In the [[Circumcision Debate]] he still denies, however, that religions engage here in the rights of others and that children are at all bearers of [[human rights]]:
Line 25:		Line 46:
	\|Author=Volker Beck		\|Author=Volker Beck
	\|Source=		\|Source=
	\|ref=<ref~~>http:~~/~~/www.bildungsbasar.de/2012/10/gesucht-argumente-gegen-ein-beschneidungsverbot/</ref~~>		\|ref=<ref name=bildungsbasar2012/>
	}}		}}
	Also in 2015, he recruited vehemently for the opening of marriage for all. On June 12, 2015, he stated on Facebook, little self-critical:		Also in 2015, he recruited vehemently for the opening of marriage for all. On June 12, 2015, he stated on Facebook, little self-critical:

WikiAdmin: added Claudia Roth

2022-08-10T06:59:25Z

added Claudia Roth

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 == Examples for double standards related to [[HGM]] ==
-=== [[Volker Beck]] ===
+=== [[Bündnis 90/Die Grünen]] ===
 [[File:Netzregeln10-Volker-Beck.jpg|thumb|100px|Beck 2010]]
 The German Greens politician Volker Beck has been working for decades for the legal equality of homosexuals. In relation to the persecution and killing of homosexuals in other countries he spoke out clearly against the encroachments of religions in the rights of others from (while the ban on the killing of another human being in a state of law needs no constraint "in the name of religion"):
@@ Line 42: / Line 43: @@
   |ref=<ref>https://twitter.com/search?q=volker%20beck</ref>
 }}
 === Central Council of Jews in Germany ===

WikiAdmin: wikify

2022-06-15T18:23:48Z

wikify

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 15 June 2022
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\|ref=<ref>http://www.bildungsbasar.de/2012/10/gesucht-argumente-gegen-ein-beschneidungsverbot/</ref>		\|ref=<ref>http://www.bildungsbasar.de/2012/10/gesucht-argumente-gegen-ein-beschneidungsverbot/</ref>
	}}		}}
	In the [[Circumcision Debate]] he still denies, however, that religions engage here in the rights of others and that children are at all bearers of human rights:		In the [[Circumcision Debate]] he still denies, however, that religions engage here in the rights of others and that children are at all bearers of [[human rights]]:
	{{Citation		{{Citation
	\|Text='''Die Religionsfreiheit rechtfertigt keine Eingriffe in die Rechte Dritter.''' Dies ist auch bei der Beschneidung nicht der Fall.		\|Text='''Die Religionsfreiheit rechtfertigt keine Eingriffe in die Rechte Dritter.''' Dies ist auch bei der Beschneidung nicht der Fall.
Line 56:		Line 56:
	=== Waris Dirie ===		=== Waris Dirie ===
	[[File:Waris_Dirie,_2018_during_her_visit_to_Sierra_Leone.jpg\|thumb\|100px\|Waris Dirie]]		[[File:Waris_Dirie,_2018_during_her_visit_to_Sierra_Leone.jpg\|thumb\|100px\|Waris Dirie]]
	Waris Dirie (born 1965 in the region of Gaalkacyo, Somalya) is an Austrian model, author and human rights activist fighting against [[female genital mutilation]] (FGM). From 1997 to 2003, she served as a UN special ambassador against female genital cutting. In 2002 she founded her own organization in Vienna (Austria), the Desert Flower Foundation.<ref name="WarisDirie">{{REFweb		Waris Dirie (born 1965 in the region of Gaalkacyo, Somalya) is an Austrian model, author and [[human rights]] activist fighting against [[female genital mutilation]] (FGM). From 1997 to 2003, she served as a UN special ambassador against female genital cutting. In 2002 she founded her own organization in Vienna (Austria), the Desert Flower Foundation.<ref name="WarisDirie">{{REFweb
	\|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waris_Dirie		\|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waris_Dirie
	\|title=Waris Dirie		\|title=Waris Dirie

WikiAdmin: wikify UNICEF

2021-12-20T16:19:59Z

wikify UNICEF

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 20 December 2021
Line 75:		Line 75:
	\|url=https://ulfdunkel.wordpress.com/2021/07/18/unicef-bitte-keine-doppelmoral-mehr/		\|url=https://ulfdunkel.wordpress.com/2021/07/18/unicef-bitte-keine-doppelmoral-mehr/
	\|title=UNICEF, bitte keine Doppelmoral mehr		\|title=UNICEF, bitte keine Doppelmoral mehr
	\|trans-title=UNICEF, please no more double standards		\|trans-title=[[UNICEF]], please no more double standards
	\|language=German		\|language=German
	\|last=Dunkel		\|last=Dunkel

WikiAdmin: using singular name for category

2021-11-29T13:49:26Z

using singular name for category

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:49, 29 November 2021
Line 120:		Line 120:

	[[Category:Bias]]		[[Category:Bias]]
	[[Category:~~Motives~~]]		[[Category:Motive]]
	[[Category:Term]]		[[Category:Term]]

	[[de:Doppelmoral]]		[[de:Doppelmoral]]

WikiAdmin: add categories Bias + Motives

2021-07-29T09:44:13Z

add categories Bias + Motives

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:44, 29 July 2021
Line 119:		Line 119:
	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

			[[Category:Bias]]
			[[Category:Motives]]
	[[Category:Term]]		[[Category:Term]]

	[[de:Doppelmoral]]		[[de:Doppelmoral]]