Fishbeck v. North Dakota - Revision history

WikiModEn2: /* Proceedings */ Wikify.

2024-01-31T18:58:26Z

Proceedings: Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 31 January 2024
Line 54:		Line 54:
	}}</ref> The Court commented:		}}</ref> The Court commented:
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
	All of the filings in the matter are extremely well done. The medical exhibits are detailed and scholarly and the credentials of those taking opposite sides on the issue of the value of routine male infant circumcision are most impressive.<ref name="memorandum1996" />		All of the filings in the matter are extremely well done. The medical exhibits are detailed and scholarly and the credentials of those taking opposite sides on the issue of the value of routine male infant [[circumcision]] are most impressive.<ref name="memorandum1996" />
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>

WikiModEn2: Add SEEALSO section; Wikify.

2023-08-08T10:38:23Z

Add SEEALSO section; Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 8 August 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Fishbeck v. North Dakota''' is a North Dakota legal case from the year of 1996 that was filed by Donna Fishbeck and others on behalf of her infant son, Jonathan Fishbeck, who had been circumcised. The plaintiffs were represented by [[Zenas Baer]] of Hawley, Minnesota. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. It named the State of North Dakota as the defendant.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb		'''Fishbeck v. North Dakota''' is a North Dakota legal case from the year of 1996 that was filed by Donna Fishbeck and others on behalf of her infant son, Jonathan Fishbeck, who had been [[circumcised]]. The plaintiffs were represented by [[Zenas Baer]] of Hawley, Minnesota. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. It named the State of North Dakota as the defendant.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb
	\|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint		\|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint
	\|archived=		\|archived=
Line 81:		Line 81:

	This case was dismissed on procedural grounds. At no time were the merits of the case considered.		This case was dismissed on procedural grounds. At no time were the merits of the case considered.
			{{SEEALSO}}
			* [[Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010)]]
	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
	* http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm		* http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm

WikiAdmin: wikify Zenas Baer

2022-07-26T08:27:37Z

wikify Zenas Baer

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 26 July 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Fishbeck v. North Dakota''' is a North Dakota legal case from the year of 1996 that was filed by Donna Fishbeck and others on behalf of her infant son, Jonathan Fishbeck, who had been circumcised. The plaintiffs were represented by [~~https://zbaer.com/~~ Zenas Baer] of Hawley, Minnesota. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. It named the State of North Dakota as the defendant.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb		'''Fishbeck v. North Dakota''' is a North Dakota legal case from the year of 1996 that was filed by Donna Fishbeck and others on behalf of her infant son, Jonathan Fishbeck, who had been circumcised. The plaintiffs were represented by [[Zenas Baer]] of Hawley, Minnesota. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. It named the State of North Dakota as the defendant.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb
	\|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint		\|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint
	\|archived=		\|archived=
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|last=Baer		\|last=Baer
	\|first=Zenas		\|first=Zenas
			\|init=Z
	\|author-link=Zenas Baer		\|author-link=Zenas Baer
	\|publisher=		\|publisher=
Line 28:		Line 29:
	\|last=Baer		\|last=Baer
	\|first=Zenas		\|first=Zenas
			\|init=Z
	\|author-link=Zenas Baer		\|author-link=Zenas Baer
	\|publisher=		\|publisher=

WikiAdmin: wikify genital integrity

2021-12-21T11:48:22Z

wikify genital integrity

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 21 December 2021
Line 16:		Line 16:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	North Dakota, had in 1995, passed a law to protect the genital integrity of females, but not males. The suit sought to extend that protection to boys under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.<ref name="complaint1996" />		North Dakota, had in 1995, passed a law to protect the [[genital integrity]] of females, but not males. The suit sought to extend that protection to boys under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.<ref name="complaint1996" />

	==Proceedings==		==Proceedings==

WikiModEn2: /* Proceedings */Amend text.

2020-06-06T18:13:19Z

Proceedings: Amend text.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 6 June 2020
Line 55:		Line 55:
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>

	Judge Conmy ~~commented~~:		Judge Conmy observed:
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
	The goal of the plaintiffs is to have routine male infant circumcision stopped. This may very well be a worthwhile goal.<ref name="memorandum1996" />		The goal of the plaintiffs is to have routine male infant circumcision stopped. This may very well be a worthwhile goal.<ref name="memorandum1996" />

WikiModEn2: Adjust footnotes.

2020-06-06T18:08:43Z

Adjust footnotes.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 6 June 2020
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|last=Baer		\|last=Baer
	\|first=Zenas		\|first=Zenas
	\|author-link=		\|author-link=Zenas Baer
	\|publisher=		\|publisher=
	\|website=boystoo.com		\|website=boystoo.com
Line 16:		Line 16:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	North Dakota, had in 1995, passed a law to protect the genital integrity of females, but not males. The suit sought to extend that protection to boys under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.<ref name="complaint1996"~~>{{REFweb~~		North Dakota, had in 1995, passed a law to protect the genital integrity of females, but not males. The suit sought to extend that protection to boys under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.<ref name="complaint1996" />
	~~\|url=http:~~/~~/www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint~~
	~~\|archived=~~
	~~\|title=Complaint~~
	~~\|trans-title=~~
	~~\|language=~~
	~~\|last=Baer~~
	~~\|first=Zenas~~
	~~\|author-link=~~
	~~\|publisher=~~
	~~\|website=boystoo.com~~
	~~\|date=1996-06-07~~
	~~\|accessdate=2020-06-06~~
	~~\|format=~~
	~~\|quote=~~
	~~}}</ref~~>

	==Proceedings==		==Proceedings==
Line 43:		Line 28:
	\|last=Baer		\|last=Baer
	\|first=Zenas		\|first=Zenas
	\|author-link=		\|author-link=Zenas Baer
	\|publisher=		\|publisher=
	\|website=boystoo.com		\|website=boystoo.com

WikiModEn2: Complete article; remove Construction Zone template.

2020-06-06T18:04:22Z

Complete article; remove Construction Zone template.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 6 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Construction Site}}~~		'''Fishbeck v. North Dakota''' is a North Dakota legal case from the year of 1996 that was filed by Donna Fishbeck and others on behalf of her infant son, Jonathan Fishbeck, who had been circumcised. The plaintiffs were represented by [https://zbaer.com/ Zenas Baer] of Hawley, Minnesota. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. It named the State of North Dakota as the defendant.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb
	'''Fishbeck v. North Dakota''' is a North Dakota legal case from the year of 1996 that was filed by Donna Fishbeck and others on behalf of her infant son, Jonathan Fishbeck, who had been circumcised. The plaintiffs were represented by Zenas Baer of Hawley, Minnesota. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. It named the State of North Dakota as the defendant.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb
	\|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint		\|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint
	\|archived=		\|archived=
Line 17:		Line 16:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	North Dakota, had in 1995, passed a law to protect the genital integrity of females, but not males. The suit sought to ~~protect the rights of~~ boys under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb		North Dakota, had in 1995, passed a law to protect the genital integrity of females, but not males. The suit sought to extend that protection to boys under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb
	\|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint		\|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint
	\|archived=		\|archived=
Line 56:		Line 55:
	\|title=Memorandum and Order		\|title=Memorandum and Order
	\|trans-title=		\|trans-title=
	\|language=		\|language=English
	\|last=Conmy		\|last=Conmy
	\|first=Patrick		\|first=Patrick
	\|author-link=		\|author-link=
	\|publisher=		\|publisher=
	\|website=		\|website=boystoo.com
	\|date=1996-10-22		\|date=1996-10-22
	\|accessdate=		\|accessdate=2020-06-06
	\|format=		\|format=
	\|quote=		\|quote=
Line 69:		Line 68:
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
	All of the filings in the matter are extremely well done. The medical exhibits are detailed and scholarly and the credentials of those taking opposite sides on the issue of the value of routine male infant circumcision are most impressive.<ref name="memorandum1996" />		All of the filings in the matter are extremely well done. The medical exhibits are detailed and scholarly and the credentials of those taking opposite sides on the issue of the value of routine male infant circumcision are most impressive.<ref name="memorandum1996" />
			</blockquote>

			Judge Conmy commented:
			<blockquote>
			The goal of the plaintiffs is to have routine male infant circumcision stopped. This may very well be a worthwhile goal.<ref name="memorandum1996" />
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>

	==Appeal==		==Appeal==
	The plaintiffs appealed the ruling of Judge Conmy to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.		The plaintiffs appealed the ruling of Judge Conmy to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing under Article III of the United States Constitution to bring this case.<ref>{{REFweb
			\|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmappeal2.htm
			\|archived=
			\|title=Judgment, ND4038-ND
			\|trans-title=
			\|language=
			\|last=Arnold
			\|first=Richard
			\|author-link=
			\|publisher=United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
			\|website=boystoo.com
			\|date=1997-06-03
			\|accessdate=2020-06-06
			\|format=
			\|quote=
			}}</ref>

			This case was dismissed on procedural grounds. At no time were the merits of the case considered.

	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}

WikiModEn2: /* Appeal */

2020-06-06T14:13:39Z

Appeal

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:13, 6 June 2020
Line 72:		Line 72:

	==Appeal==		==Appeal==
			The plaintiffs appealed the ruling of Judge Conmy to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}

WikiModEn2: /* Proceedings */

2020-06-06T14:04:54Z

Proceedings

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 6 June 2020
Line 51:		Line 51:
	\|format=		\|format=
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	}}</ref> Patrick A. Conmy, District Judge ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the case and it was dismissed without a ruling on the merits of the case.<ref>{{REFweb		}}</ref> Patrick A. Conmy, District Judge ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the case and it was dismissed without a ruling on the merits of the case.<ref name="memorandum1996">{{REFweb
	\|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict2.htm		\|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict2.htm
	\|archived=		\|archived=
Line 66:		Line 66:
	\|format=		\|format=
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	}}</ref>		}}</ref> The Court commented:
			<blockquote>
			All of the filings in the matter are extremely well done. The medical exhibits are detailed and scholarly and the credentials of those taking opposite sides on the issue of the value of routine male infant circumcision are most impressive.<ref name="memorandum1996" />
			</blockquote>

	==Appeal==		==Appeal==

WikiModEn2: Add text.

2020-06-06T13:55:39Z

Add text.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Construction Site}}
 {{LINKS}}
 * http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm
 * http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmappeal1.htm
-<!-- {{REF}} -->
+{{REF}}
 [[Category:'... v. ...']]