Jurisprudence - Revision history

WikiModEn2 at 13:02, 9 November 2024

2024-11-09T13:02:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 9 November 2024
Line 128:		Line 128:
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	}}		}}
	* {{REFweb\|url=https://~~www~~.~~i2researchhub~~.org/~~articles/ch-10-american-law-and-the-circumcision-of-children-doc-genital-integrity-statement~~/		* {{REFweb\|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2008_Genital_Integrity_Policy_Statement.pdf
	\|title=Ch. 10: American Law and the Circumcision of Children (DOC Genital Integrity Statement)		\|title=Ch. 10: American Law and the Circumcision of Children (DOC Genital Integrity Statement)
	\|trans-title=		\|trans-title=
Line 139:		Line 139:
	\|date=2008-07-15		\|date=2008-07-15
	\|accessdate=2020-01-03		\|accessdate=2020-01-03
	\|format=		\|format=PDF
	\|quote=		\|quote=If a child does not need a circumcision, then the parental power to seek a circumcision does not exist.
			A consent for an unnecessary circumcision would be vitiated and invalid, so any circumcision performed
			with such a consent would be medical battery or criminal assault.
	}}		}}

	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

			[[category:Criminal circumcision]]
	[[Category:Jurisprudence]]		[[Category:Jurisprudence]]

WikiModEn2: Add link in SEEALSO section.

2024-08-08T16:22:00Z

Add link in SEEALSO section.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 8 August 2024
Line 109:		Line 109:
	\|accessdate=2021-06-25		\|accessdate=2021-06-25
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}
			* [[Application of Health Standards in Traditional Circumcision Act]]
	* [[Attorneys for the Rights of the Child]]		* [[Attorneys for the Rights of the Child]]

	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
	* {{REFweb		* {{REFweb

WikiModEn2: /* UK */ Add text and Wikify.

2024-05-19T15:15:48Z

UK: Add text and Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:15, 19 May 2024
Line 90:		Line 90:
	\|accessdate=2020-05-26		\|accessdate=2020-05-26
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>
	* In the case of Re B and G (~~Children~~) (No 2) ~~[2015]~~ EWFC 3, [2015], Sir James Munby ruled that male infant circumcision constituted "significant harm" and therefore a violation of the [[Children Act 1989]].		* In the case of [[Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3]] , [2015], Sir James Munby ruled that male infant circumcision constituted "significant harm" and therefore a violation of the [[Children Act 1989]].
			* In the 2016 case of [[Re L and B (CHILDREN)]] the court ruled that circumcision should be deferred until the child is old enough to decide for himself.
	* In 2021, a British judge has ruled that a boy who was taken into care shouldn't be subjected to non-consensual, non-therapeutic genital cutting. Mr. Justice Cobb said a decision about circumcision should be deferred until the 21-month-old boy is older and able to ‘make his own choice’.<ref>{{REFjournal		* In 2021, a British judge has ruled that a boy who was taken into care shouldn't be subjected to non-consensual, non-therapeutic genital cutting. Mr. Justice Cobb said a decision about circumcision should be deferred until the 21-month-old boy is older and able to ‘make his own choice’.<ref>{{REFjournal
	\|url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/justice-muslim-high-court-b940506.html		\|url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/justice-muslim-high-court-b940506.html

WikiModEn2: /* UK */ Add text and Wikify.

2024-05-19T14:55:19Z

UK: Add text and Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 19 May 2024
Line 90:		Line 90:
	\|accessdate=2020-05-26		\|accessdate=2020-05-26
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>
			* In the case of Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015], Sir James Munby ruled that male infant circumcision constituted "significant harm" and therefore a violation of the [[Children Act 1989]].
	* In 2021, a British judge has ruled that a boy who was taken into care shouldn't be subjected to non-consensual, non-therapeutic genital cutting. Mr. Justice Cobb said a decision about circumcision should be deferred until the 21-month-old boy is older and able to ‘make his own choice’.<ref>{{REFjournal		* In 2021, a British judge has ruled that a boy who was taken into care shouldn't be subjected to non-consensual, non-therapeutic genital cutting. Mr. Justice Cobb said a decision about circumcision should be deferred until the 21-month-old boy is older and able to ‘make his own choice’.<ref>{{REFjournal
	\|url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/justice-muslim-high-court-b940506.html		\|url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/justice-muslim-high-court-b940506.html

WikiAdmin: wikify DOC

2022-06-16T08:57:07Z

wikify DOC

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 16 June 2022
Line 134:		Line 134:
	\|first=George		\|first=George
	\|author-link=George Hill		\|author-link=George Hill
	\|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision		\|publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]]
	\|website=Research Hub		\|website=Research Hub
	\|date=2008-07-15		\|date=2008-07-15

WikiAdmin: wikify

2022-06-15T17:45:27Z

wikify

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 15 June 2022
Line 82:		Line 82:

	== UK ==		== UK ==
	* In 2013, a doctor circumcised a baby boy when the supposed paternal grandparents of the boy ordered him to do so. In 2017, these three suspects have been arrested after the mother of the boy fought for years. It wasn’t until she teamed up with the anti-circumcision group [[Men Do Complain]] and leading human rights lawyer Saimo Chahal QC that things began to change. All three were arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to commit grievous bodily harm, though it’s unclear what became of the case and whether or not charges proceeded against the grandparents. However, the doctor in question, Dr. Balvinder Mehat, was suspended for a month.<ref>{{REFnews		* In 2013, a doctor circumcised a baby boy when the supposed paternal grandparents of the boy ordered him to do so. In 2017, these three suspects have been arrested after the mother of the boy fought for years. It wasn’t until she teamed up with the anti-circumcision group [[Men Do Complain]] and leading [[human rights]] lawyer Saimo Chahal QC that things began to change. All three were arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to commit grievous bodily harm, though it’s unclear what became of the case and whether or not charges proceeded against the grandparents. However, the doctor in question, Dr. Balvinder Mehat, was suspended for a month.<ref>{{REFnews
	\|url=https://www.bolde.com/grandparents-arrested-circumcised-son/		\|url=https://www.bolde.com/grandparents-arrested-circumcised-son/
	\|title=Grandparents Arrested After Mom Discovers They Circumcised Her 3-Month-Old Son Without Permission		\|title=Grandparents Arrested After Mom Discovers They Circumcised Her 3-Month-Old Son Without Permission

WikiAdmin: wikify amputation

2021-11-13T11:10:16Z

wikify amputation

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 13 November 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:
	== Germany ==		== Germany ==
	* 2012: The so-called [[Cologne circumcision court judgment]] of 7 May 2012 has definitely gone down in history, but it has triggered a short, heated [[Circumcision Debate\|circumcision debate]] in Germany and the German-speaking neighboring countries, on 12 December 2012 to hasty adoption of the so-called [[German Circumcision Act]] led to the repeal of the [[Cologne circumcision court judgment]].		* 2012: The so-called [[Cologne circumcision court judgment]] of 7 May 2012 has definitely gone down in history, but it has triggered a short, heated [[Circumcision Debate\|circumcision debate]] in Germany and the German-speaking neighboring countries, on 12 December 2012 to hasty adoption of the so-called [[German Circumcision Act]] led to the repeal of the [[Cologne circumcision court judgment]].
	* 2019: In Ascheberg, a 43-year-old Syrian surgeon was sentenced to a prison sentence of 2.5 years on 10 October 2019 for failing to carry out the foreskin amputation of a six-month-old infant and others in a professional manner.<ref>{{REFweb		* 2019: In Ascheberg, a 43-year-old Syrian surgeon was sentenced to a prison sentence of 2.5 years on 10 October 2019 for failing to carry out the foreskin [[amputation]] of a six-month-old infant and others in a professional manner.<ref>{{REFweb
	\|url=https://www.msl24.de/muensterland/coesfeld-ort847849/ascheberg-saeuglinge-beschnitten-urteil-gegen-syrischen-arzt-13101437.html		\|url=https://www.msl24.de/muensterland/coesfeld-ort847849/ascheberg-saeuglinge-beschnitten-urteil-gegen-syrischen-arzt-13101437.html
	\|title=Säuglinge beschnitten: Arzt wegen gefährlicher Körperverletzung verurteilt		\|title=Säuglinge beschnitten: Arzt wegen gefährlicher Körperverletzung verurteilt

WikiAdmin: /* UK */ added 2021 judgement

2021-06-25T13:22:54Z

UK: added 2021 judgement

@@ Line 89: / Line 89: @@
   |publisher=Bolde
   |accessdate=2020-05-26
 }}</ref>

WikiAdmin at 08:45, 29 May 2020

2020-05-29T08:45:51Z

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
   |accessdate=2020-05-26
 }}</ref>
 == Switzerland ==
@@ Line 117: / Line 128: @@
 [[Category:Jurisprudence]]
 [[de:Rechtsprechung]]

WikiAdmin: add UK 2013

2020-05-26T11:54:55Z

add UK 2013

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:54, 26 May 2020
Line 69:		Line 69:
	\|accessdate=2019-10-16		\|accessdate=2019-10-16
	}}</ref> It has been established that Musa allegedly picked up children from schools and along the way without the consent of the parents, he later took them to hospital for circumcision as he earns 50,000 Uganda Shilling (UGX - about 13.55 USD<ref>{{REFweb \|url=https://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=50%2C000&From=UGX&To=USD \|title=50000 UGX to USD \|publisher=XE \|accessdate=2019-10-19}}</ref>) per head. The case hasen't been ruled yet.		}}</ref> It has been established that Musa allegedly picked up children from schools and along the way without the consent of the parents, he later took them to hospital for circumcision as he earns 50,000 Uganda Shilling (UGX - about 13.55 USD<ref>{{REFweb \|url=https://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=50%2C000&From=UGX&To=USD \|title=50000 UGX to USD \|publisher=XE \|accessdate=2019-10-19}}</ref>) per head. The case hasen't been ruled yet.

			== UK ==
			* In 2013, a doctor circumcised a baby boy when the supposed paternal grandparents of the boy ordered him to do so. In 2017, these three suspects have been arrested after the mother of the boy fought for years. It wasn’t until she teamed up with the anti-circumcision group [[Men Do Complain]] and leading human rights lawyer Saimo Chahal QC that things began to change. All three were arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to commit grievous bodily harm, though it’s unclear what became of the case and whether or not charges proceeded against the grandparents. However, the doctor in question, Dr. Balvinder Mehat, was suspended for a month.<ref>{{REFnews
			\|url=https://www.bolde.com/grandparents-arrested-circumcised-son/
			\|title=Grandparents Arrested After Mom Discovers They Circumcised Her 3-Month-Old Son Without Permission
			\|first=Ellie
			\|last=Kildare
			\|publisher=Bolde
			\|accessdate=2020-05-26
			}}</ref>

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}

	* [[Attorneys for the Rights of the Child]]		* [[Attorneys for the Rights of the Child]]

	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}

	* {{REFweb		* {{REFweb
	\|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/		\|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/
Line 91:		Line 99:
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	}}		}}

	* {{REFweb\|url=https://www.i2researchhub.org/articles/ch-10-american-law-and-the-circumcision-of-children-doc-genital-integrity-statement/		* {{REFweb\|url=https://www.i2researchhub.org/articles/ch-10-american-law-and-the-circumcision-of-children-doc-genital-integrity-statement/
	\|title=Ch. 10: American Law and the Circumcision of Children (DOC Genital Integrity Statement)		\|title=Ch. 10: American Law and the Circumcision of Children (DOC Genital Integrity Statement)