Mutilation - Revision history

WikiAdmin: changed and added category

2023-08-18T05:51:04Z

changed and added category

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:51, 18 August 2023
Line 40:		Line 40:
	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

	[[Category:~~Term~~]]		[[Category:Circumcision term]]
			[[Category:Medical term]]

WikiAdmin: using UNI template

2021-12-12T12:42:43Z

using UNI template

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 12 December 2021
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\|volume=19		\|volume=19
	\|edition=11		\|edition=11
	\|publisher=Cambridge University Press		\|publisher={{UNI\|Cambridge University\|UCam}} Press
	\|pages=99–100		\|pages=99–100
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

WikiAdmin: using REFbook

2021-11-26T11:59:26Z

using REFbook

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 26 November 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Citation		{{Citation
	\|Title=Mutilation		\|Title=Mutilation
	\|Text='''Mutilation''' or '''maiming''' (from the Latin: ''mutilus'') is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured.<ref>Chisholm, Hugh~~, ed. (~~1911~~). "~~Mutilation~~" .~~ Encyclopædia Britannica. 19 ~~(11th ed.).~~ Cambridge University Press~~. pp.~~ 99–100.</ref>		\|Text='''Mutilation''' or '''maiming''' (from the Latin: ''mutilus'') is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured.<ref>{{REFbook
			\|editor=Chisholm, Hugh
			\|year=1911
			\|chapter=Mutilation
			\|title=Encyclopædia Britannica
			\|volume=19
			\|edition=11
			\|publisher=Cambridge University Press
			\|pages=99–100
			}}</ref>
	\|Author=Wikipedia		\|Author=Wikipedia
	\|ref=<ref>{{URLwikipedia\|~~https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/~~Mutilation\|Mutilation\|2020-09-12}}</ref>		\|ref=<ref>{{URLwikipedia\|Mutilation\|Mutilation\|2020-09-12}}</ref>
	}}		}}

WikiModEn2: /* Circumcision debate */ Wikify "amptuation".

2021-11-12T23:11:26Z

Circumcision debate: Wikify "amptuation".

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 12 November 2021
Line 25:		Line 25:
	In many debates and discussions about [[circumcision]], one can hear the argument that [[MGM]] cannot be named a mutilation. The above definition alone proves this pseudo-argument wrong. There are reasons for those who want to defend the right of parents to genitally mutilate their children (both male and female, because in different cultures the [[arguments pro circumcision]] are identical or at least very similar for both [[FGM]] and [[MGM]]).		In many debates and discussions about [[circumcision]], one can hear the argument that [[MGM]] cannot be named a mutilation. The above definition alone proves this pseudo-argument wrong. There are reasons for those who want to defend the right of parents to genitally mutilate their children (both male and female, because in different cultures the [[arguments pro circumcision]] are identical or at least very similar for both [[FGM]] and [[MGM]]).

	# The term ''circumcision'' is a [[euphemism]] of what is actually done to the child. Avoiding correct terms like "foreskin amputation" or "mutilation" obscures the view on the facts.		# The term ''circumcision'' is a [[euphemism]] of what is actually done to the child. Avoiding correct terms like "[[foreskin]] [[amputation]]" or "mutilation" obscures the view on the facts.
	# Many adults who want to ensure that children's genitals can still be mutilated are themselves victims of genital mutilation. Therefore, the behavior can be explained by avoiding terms that could trigger them to relive the suffering they experienced yourself. See [[Collective Cognitive Dissonance]] for more psychological details.		# Many adults who want to ensure that children's genitals can still be mutilated are themselves victims of genital mutilation. Therefore, the behavior can be explained by avoiding terms that could trigger them to relive the suffering they experienced yourself. See [[Collective Cognitive Dissonance]] for more psychological details.
	# Publications such as "Desert Flower" by Waris Dirie have brought female genital mutilation, which in the past was also belittled as "circumcision", into the public eye. The same weighting of male genital mutilation is still missing in public. Therefore, it is easier for circumcision advocates to continue to use the trivializing term "circumcision" to protect themselves and their interests behind it.		# Publications such as "Desert Flower" by Waris Dirie have brought female genital mutilation, which in the past was also belittled as "circumcision", into the public eye. The same weighting of male genital mutilation is still missing in public. Therefore, it is easier for circumcision advocates to continue to use the trivializing term "circumcision" to protect themselves and their interests behind it.

WikiAdmin: wikify euphemism

2021-09-09T09:00:50Z

wikify euphemism

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:00, 9 September 2021
Line 25:		Line 25:
	In many debates and discussions about [[circumcision]], one can hear the argument that [[MGM]] cannot be named a mutilation. The above definition alone proves this pseudo-argument wrong. There are reasons for those who want to defend the right of parents to genitally mutilate their children (both male and female, because in different cultures the [[arguments pro circumcision]] are identical or at least very similar for both [[FGM]] and [[MGM]]).		In many debates and discussions about [[circumcision]], one can hear the argument that [[MGM]] cannot be named a mutilation. The above definition alone proves this pseudo-argument wrong. There are reasons for those who want to defend the right of parents to genitally mutilate their children (both male and female, because in different cultures the [[arguments pro circumcision]] are identical or at least very similar for both [[FGM]] and [[MGM]]).

	# The term ''circumcision'' is an euphemism of what is actually done to the child. Avoiding correct terms like "foreskin amputation" or "mutilation" obscures the view on the facts.		# The term ''circumcision'' is a [[euphemism]] of what is actually done to the child. Avoiding correct terms like "foreskin amputation" or "mutilation" obscures the view on the facts.
	# Many adults who want to ensure that children's genitals can still be mutilated are themselves victims of genital mutilation. Therefore, the behavior can be explained by avoiding terms that could trigger them to relive the suffering they experienced yourself. See [[Collective Cognitive Dissonance]] for more psychological details.		# Many adults who want to ensure that children's genitals can still be mutilated are themselves victims of genital mutilation. Therefore, the behavior can be explained by avoiding terms that could trigger them to relive the suffering they experienced yourself. See [[Collective Cognitive Dissonance]] for more psychological details.
	# Publications such as "Desert Flower" by Waris Dirie have brought female genital mutilation, which in the past was also belittled as "circumcision", into the public eye. The same weighting of male genital mutilation is still missing in public. Therefore, it is easier for circumcision advocates to continue to use the trivializing term "circumcision" to protect themselves and their interests behind it.		# Publications such as "Desert Flower" by Waris Dirie have brought female genital mutilation, which in the past was also belittled as "circumcision", into the public eye. The same weighting of male genital mutilation is still missing in public. Therefore, it is easier for circumcision advocates to continue to use the trivializing term "circumcision" to protect themselves and their interests behind it.

WikiAdmin: using singular name for category

2021-07-26T10:04:28Z

using singular name for category

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:04, 26 July 2021
Line 31:		Line 31:
	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

	[[Category:~~Terms~~]]		[[Category:Term]]

WikiModEn2: Add British court definition.

2020-09-13T00:13:31Z

Add British court definition.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:13, 13 September 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Citation		{{Citation
	\|Title=Mutilation \|Text='''Mutilation''' or '''maiming''' (from the Latin: ''mutilus'') is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured.<ref>Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Mutilation" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 19 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 99–100.</ref> \|Author=Wikipedia \|ref=<ref>{{URLwikipedia\|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutilation\|Mutilation\|2020-09-12}}</ref>		\|Title=Mutilation
			\|Text='''Mutilation''' or '''maiming''' (from the Latin: ''mutilus'') is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured.<ref>Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Mutilation" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 19 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 99–100.</ref>
			\|Author=Wikipedia
			\|ref=<ref>{{URLwikipedia\|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutilation\|Mutilation\|2020-09-12}}</ref>
			}}

	A British ~~Court~~ (2015) has defined ''mutilation'' as:		A British court (2015) has defined ''mutilation'' as:
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
	[12] The word “mutilation” is not further elaborated or defined in the statute, so I turn to the dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary defines “mutilation” as meaning “the action of mutilating a person or animal; the severing or maiming of a limb or bodily organ”, “mutilate” being defined as meaning “To deprive (a person or animal) of the use of a limb or bodily organ, by dismemberment or otherwise; to cut off or destroy (a limb or organ); to wound severely, inflict violent or disfiguring injury on.”<ref name="bangham2015">{{REFdocument		[12] The word “mutilation” is not further elaborated or defined in the statute, so I turn to the dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary defines “mutilation” as meaning “the action of mutilating a person or animal; the severing or maiming of a limb or bodily organ”, “mutilate” being defined as meaning “To deprive (a person or animal) of the use of a limb or bodily organ, by dismemberment or otherwise; to cut off or destroy (a limb or organ); to wound severely, inflict violent or disfiguring injury on.”<ref name="bangham2015">{{REFdocument

WikiModEn2: Add British court definition.

2020-09-13T00:01:19Z

Add British court definition.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:01, 13 September 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Citation		{{Citation
	\|Title=Mutilation		\|Title=Mutilation \|Text='''Mutilation''' or '''maiming''' (from the Latin: ''mutilus'') is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured.<ref>Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Mutilation" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 19 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 99–100.</ref> \|Author=Wikipedia \|ref=<ref>{{URLwikipedia\|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutilation\|Mutilation\|2020-09-12}}</ref>
	\|Text='''Mutilation''' or '''maiming''' (from the Latin: ''mutilus'') is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured.<ref>Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Mutilation" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 19 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 99–100.</ref>
	\|Author=Wikipedia		A British Court (2015) has defined ''mutilation'' as:
	\|ref=<ref>{{URLwikipedia\|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutilation\|Mutilation\|2020-09-12}}</ref>		<blockquote>
	}}		[12] The word “mutilation” is not further elaborated or defined in the statute, so I turn to the dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary defines “mutilation” as meaning “the action of mutilating a person or animal; the severing or maiming of a limb or bodily organ”, “mutilate” being defined as meaning “To deprive (a person or animal) of the use of a limb or bodily organ, by dismemberment or otherwise; to cut off or destroy (a limb or organ); to wound severely, inflict violent or disfiguring injury on.”<ref name="bangham2015">{{REFdocument
			\|title=Judgment
			\|url=https://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/re-b-and-g-children-no-2-2015-ewfc-3
			\|contribution=
			\|last=Bangham
			\|first=Samantha
			\|publisher=Family Law
			\|format=
			\|date=2015-01-14
			\|accessdate=2020-09-12
			}}</ref>

			</blockquote>

	== Circumcision debate ==		== Circumcision debate ==

WikiAdmin: Created page with "{{Citation |Title=Mutilation |Text='''Mutilation''' or '''maiming''' (from the Latin: ''mutilus'') is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the pa..."

2020-09-12T09:02:49Z

Created page with "{{Citation |Title=Mutilation |Text='''Mutilation''' or '''maiming''' (from the Latin: ''mutilus'') is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the pa..."

New page

{{Citation
|Title=Mutilation
|Text='''Mutilation''' or '''maiming''' (from the Latin: ''mutilus'') is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured.<ref>Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Mutilation" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 19 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 99–100.</ref>
|Author=Wikipedia
|ref=<ref>{{URLwikipedia|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutilation|Mutilation|2020-09-12}}</ref>
}}

== Circumcision debate ==
In many debates and discussions about [[circumcision]], one can hear the argument that [[MGM]] cannot be named a mutilation. The above definition alone proves this pseudo-argument wrong. There are reasons for those who want to defend the right of parents to genitally mutilate their children (both male and female, because in different cultures the [[arguments pro circumcision]] are identical or at least very similar for both [[FGM]] and [[MGM]]).

# The term ''circumcision'' is an euphemism of what is actually done to the child. Avoiding correct terms like "foreskin amputation" or "mutilation" obscures the view on the facts.
# Many adults who want to ensure that children's genitals can still be mutilated are themselves victims of genital mutilation. Therefore, the behavior can be explained by avoiding terms that could trigger them to relive the suffering they experienced yourself. See [[Collective Cognitive Dissonance]] for more psychological details.
# Publications such as "Desert Flower" by Waris Dirie have brought female genital mutilation, which in the past was also belittled as "circumcision", into the public eye. The same weighting of male genital mutilation is still missing in public. Therefore, it is easier for circumcision advocates to continue to use the trivializing term "circumcision" to protect themselves and their interests behind it.

{{REF}}

[[Category:Terms]]