New Jersey case - Revision history

WikiAdmin: fixed CIRP URLs

2024-06-19T09:44:06Z

fixed CIRP URLs

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:44, 19 June 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|archived=		\|archived=
	\|title=The case of Matthew Price		\|title=The case of Matthew Price
	~~\|trans-title=~~
	~~\|language=English~~
	\|last=Young		\|last=Young
	\|first=Hugh		\|first=Hugh
	\|author-link=Hugh Young		\|author-link=Hugh Young
	~~\|publisher=~~
	\|website=www.circumstitions.com		\|website=www.circumstitions.com
	\|date=2001		\|date=2001
	\|accessdate=2020-06-18		\|accessdate=2020-06-18
	~~\|format=~~
	~~\|quote=~~
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	James Price, the father brought a suit to protect his son from a harmful and injurious circumcision. The trial was held in the court of Judge Paul Armstrong in [https://www.njcourts.gov/courts/vicinages/hunsomwar.html Somerset County]. Judge Armstrong ordered a circumcision, but James Price appealed. The appellate court upheld Judge Armstrong's order, but [https://www.njcourts.gov/courts/supreme.html?lang=eng State Supreme Court] Justice Peter Verniero issued an emergency stay the following day, and on Oct. 31 the justices voted to send the matter back to Armstrong for a full hearing.<ref name="coscarelli2000">{{REFnews		James Price, the father brought a suit to protect his son from a harmful and injurious circumcision. The trial was held in the court of Judge Paul Armstrong in [https://www.njcourts.gov/courts/vicinages/hunsomwar.html Somerset County]. Judge Armstrong ordered a circumcision, but James Price appealed. The appellate court upheld Judge Armstrong's order, but [https://www.njcourts.gov/courts/supreme.html?lang=eng State Supreme Court] Justice Peter Verniero issued an emergency stay the following day, and on Oct. 31 the justices voted to send the matter back to Armstrong for a full hearing.<ref name="coscarelli2000">{{REFnews
	\|title=Mother's battle to circumcise is in court		\|title=Mother's battle to circumcise is in court
	\|url=~~http~~://www.cirp.org/news/~~star~~-~~ledger12~~-03-~~00/~~		\|url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2000/2000-12-03_star-ledger.php
	\|last=Coscarelli		\|last=Coscarelli
	\|first=Kate		\|first=Kate
	~~\|coauthors=~~		\|publisher=Star-Ledger (Newark)
	\|publisher=~~Newark~~ Star-Ledger		\|website=[[CIRP]]
	\|website=~~www.cirp.org~~
	\|date=2000-12-03		\|date=2000-12-03
	\|accessdate=2020-06-19		\|accessdate=2020-06-19
Line 37:		Line 31:
	\|issue=		\|issue=
	\|pages=134-35		\|pages=134-35
	\|url=~~http~~://www.cirp.org/library/normal/wright2/		\|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/normal/wright2/
	~~\|quote=~~
	\|pubmedID=8295581		\|pubmedID=8295581
	\|pubmedCID=		\|pubmedCID=
Line 48:		Line 41:
	In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The [https://www.mhsnj.org Medical Society of New Jersey] and the Urology Society of New Jersey both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement that Matthew's [[genital integrity]] would be protected, no precedent was set.<ref name="coscarelli2001">{{REFnews		In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The [https://www.mhsnj.org Medical Society of New Jersey] and the Urology Society of New Jersey both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement that Matthew's [[genital integrity]] would be protected, no precedent was set.<ref name="coscarelli2001">{{REFnews
	\|title=Accord not to circumcise son still leaves heated legal debate		\|title=Accord not to circumcise son still leaves heated legal debate
	\|url=~~http~~://www.cirp.org/news/~~star~~-~~ledger01~~-25-~~01/~~		\|url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2001/2001-01-25_star-ledger.php
	\|last=Coscarelli		\|last=Coscarelli
	\|first=Kate		\|first=Kate
	~~\|coauthors=~~		\|publisher=Star-Ledger (Newark)
	\|publisher=~~Newark~~ Star-Ledger		\|website=[[CIRP]]
	\|website=~~www.cirp.org~~
	\|date=2001-01-25		\|date=2001-01-25
	\|accessdate=~~2020~~-06-19		\|accessdate=2024-06-19
	~~\|quote=~~
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}

	* [[Foreskin Care for Boys]]		* [[Foreskin Care for Boys]]

	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
			* {{URLwikipedia\|Circumcision_and_law#United_States\|Circumcision and law: United States\|2024-06-19}}
	* ~~http~~:~~//www.cirp.org/news/star~~-~~ledger01~~-~~25-01/~~
	* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_and_law#United_States

	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

WikiAdmin: wikify genital integrity

2021-12-21T11:53:04Z

wikify genital integrity

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 21 December 2021
Line 46:		Line 46:
	}}</ref> Matthew did not receive good care of his penis from his mother.		}}</ref> Matthew did not receive good care of his penis from his mother.

	In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The [https://www.mhsnj.org Medical Society of New Jersey] and the Urology Society of New Jersey both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement that Matthew's genital integrity would be protected, no precedent was set.<ref name="coscarelli2001">{{REFnews		In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The [https://www.mhsnj.org Medical Society of New Jersey] and the Urology Society of New Jersey both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement that Matthew's [[genital integrity]] would be protected, no precedent was set.<ref name="coscarelli2001">{{REFnews
	\|title=Accord not to circumcise son still leaves heated legal debate		\|title=Accord not to circumcise son still leaves heated legal debate
	\|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger01-25-01/		\|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger01-25-01/

WikiAdmin: adjusted REFjournal

2020-12-30T11:08:56Z

adjusted REFjournal

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:08, 30 December 2020
Line 31:		Line 31:
	Good medical practice requires that a boy's protective foreskin not be disturbed by forcible retraction. Wright reported, "[t]he normal prepuce should be left alone, with no attempt to retract it until the boy is able to do it himself, at the earliest at three years of age."<ref name="Wright1994">{{REFjournal		Good medical practice requires that a boy's protective foreskin not be disturbed by forcible retraction. Wright reported, "[t]he normal prepuce should be left alone, with no attempt to retract it until the boy is able to do it himself, at the earliest at three years of age."<ref name="Wright1994">{{REFjournal
	\|last=Wright		\|last=Wright
	\|~~first~~=~~J.E.~~		\|init=JE
	\|title=Further to the "Further Fate of the Foreskin"		\|title=Further to the "Further Fate of the Foreskin"
	\|journal=Med J Aust		\|journal=Med J Aust

WikiModEn2: Add citation. Remove Construction Site template.

2020-06-19T10:47:12Z

Add citation. Remove Construction Site template.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 19 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Construction Site}}~~

	'''Matthew Price''' was a 3-year-old in New Jersey, whose parents, Jim and Jennifer, agreed to leave him intact. But the doctor instructed them to retract his foreskin daily. This has not been recommended for decades. Predictabily, it caused inflammation and the doctor then recommended circumcision. Instead, the Prices stopped retracting and Matthew's problems cleared up in June 2000. The Prices are now separated, but Jennifer, who has custody, still wanted him circumcised. Jim had a traumatic circumcision and went to court to ensure that Matthew was left alone."<ref>{{REFweb		'''Matthew Price''' was a 3-year-old in New Jersey, whose parents, Jim and Jennifer, agreed to leave him intact. But the doctor instructed them to retract his foreskin daily. This has not been recommended for decades. Predictabily, it caused inflammation and the doctor then recommended circumcision. Instead, the Prices stopped retracting and Matthew's problems cleared up in June 2000. The Prices are now separated, but Jennifer, who has custody, still wanted him circumcised. Jim had a traumatic circumcision and went to court to ensure that Matthew was left alone."<ref>{{REFweb
	\|url=http://www.circumstitions.com/Matt.html		\|url=http://www.circumstitions.com/Matt.html
Line 18:		Line 16:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	James Price, the father brought a suit to protect his son from a harmful and injurious circumcision. The trial was held in the court of Judge Paul Armstrong in Somerset County. Judge Armstrong ordered a circumcision, but James Price appealed. The appellate court upheld Judge Armstrong's order, but State Supreme Court Justice Peter Verniero issued an emergency stay the following day, and on Oct. 31 the justices voted to send the matter back to Armstrong for a full hearing.<ref name="coscarelli2000">{{REFnews		James Price, the father brought a suit to protect his son from a harmful and injurious circumcision. The trial was held in the court of Judge Paul Armstrong in [https://www.njcourts.gov/courts/vicinages/hunsomwar.html Somerset County]. Judge Armstrong ordered a circumcision, but James Price appealed. The appellate court upheld Judge Armstrong's order, but [https://www.njcourts.gov/courts/supreme.html?lang=eng State Supreme Court] Justice Peter Verniero issued an emergency stay the following day, and on Oct. 31 the justices voted to send the matter back to Armstrong for a full hearing.<ref name="coscarelli2000">{{REFnews
	\|title=Mother's battle to circumcise is in court		\|title=Mother's battle to circumcise is in court
	\|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger12-03-00/		\|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger12-03-00/
Line 48:		Line 46:
	}}</ref> Matthew did not receive good care of his penis from his mother.		}}</ref> Matthew did not receive good care of his penis from his mother.

			In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The [https://www.mhsnj.org Medical Society of New Jersey] and the Urology Society of New Jersey both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement that Matthew's genital integrity would be protected, no precedent was set.<ref name="coscarelli2001">{{REFnews
	In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The [https://www.mhsnj.org Medical Society of New Jersey] and the Urology Society of New Jersey both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement, no precedent was set.		\|title=Accord not to circumcise son still leaves heated legal debate
			\|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger01-25-01/
			\|last=Coscarelli
			\|first=Kate
			\|coauthors=
			\|publisher=Newark Star-Ledger
			\|website=www.cirp.org
			\|date=2001-01-25
			\|accessdate=2020-06-19
			\|quote=
			}}</ref>

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}

WikiModEn2: Add text.

2020-06-19T10:24:35Z

Add text.

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
   |quote=
 }}</ref>
 In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The [https://www.mhsnj.org Medical Society of New Jersey] and the Urology Society of New Jersey both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement, no precedent was set.
 {{LINKS}}
 * http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger01-25-01/
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_and_law#United_States

WikiModEn2: Remove bad link.

2020-06-19T01:06:04Z

Remove bad link.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:06, 19 June 2020
Line 18:		Line 18:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The [https://www.mhsnj.org Medical Society of New Jersey] and the ~~[usnj.org~~ Urology Society of New Jersey] both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement, no precedent was set.		In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The [https://www.mhsnj.org Medical Society of New Jersey] and the Urology Society of New Jersey both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement, no precedent was set.

	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}

WikiModEn2: Add reference; Add reference section; Add links.

2020-06-19T00:52:10Z

Add reference; Add reference section; Add links.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:52, 19 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Construction Site}}		{{Construction Site}}

	In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The Medical Society of New Jersey and the ~~Urological~~ Society of New Jersey both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement, no precedent was set.		'''Matthew Price''' was a 3-year-old in New Jersey, whose parents, Jim and Jennifer, agreed to leave him intact. But the doctor instructed them to retract his foreskin daily. This has not been recommended for decades. Predictabily, it caused inflammation and the doctor then recommended circumcision. Instead, the Prices stopped retracting and Matthew's problems cleared up in June 2000. The Prices are now separated, but Jennifer, who has custody, still wanted him circumcised. Jim had a traumatic circumcision and went to court to ensure that Matthew was left alone."<ref>{{REFweb
			\|url=http://www.circumstitions.com/Matt.html
			\|archived=
			\|title=The case of Matthew Price
			\|trans-title=
			\|language=English
			\|last=Young
			\|first=Hugh
			\|author-link=Hugh Young
			\|publisher=
			\|website=www.circumstitions.com
			\|date=2001
			\|accessdate=2020-06-18
			\|format=
			\|quote=
			}}</ref>

			In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The [https://www.mhsnj.org Medical Society of New Jersey] and the [usnj.org Urology Society of New Jersey] both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement, no precedent was set.

	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
	* http://www.circumstitions.com/Matt.html
	* http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger12-03-00/		* http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger12-03-00/
	* http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger01-25-01/		* http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger01-25-01/
	* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_and_law#United_States		* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_and_law#United_States

	~~<!--~~ {{REF}} ~~-->~~		{{REF}}

	[[Category:Litigation]]		[[Category:Litigation]]

WikiAdmin at 18:42, 20 April 2020

2020-04-20T18:42:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 20 April 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Category:Litigation]]		[[Category:Litigation]]
	[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]		[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]
	~~[[Category:Under construction]]~~

	[[Category:From IntactWiki]]		[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

WikiAdmin: Created page with "{{Construction Site}} In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her requ..."

2019-09-02T06:34:58Z

Created page with "{{Construction Site}} In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her requ..."

New page

{{Construction Site}}

In January 2001 a dispute between divorcing parents in New Jersey was resolved when the mother, who sought to have the boy circumcised withdrew her request. The boy had experienced two instances of foreskin inflammation and she wanted to have him circumcised. The father, who had experienced a traumatic circumcision as a child objected and they turned to the courts for a decision. The Medical Society of New Jersey and the Urological Society of New Jersey both opposed any court ordered medical treatment. As the parties came to an agreement, no precedent was set.

{{LINKS}}
* http://www.circumstitions.com/Matt.html
* http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger12-03-00/
* http://www.cirp.org/news/star-ledger01-25-01/
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_and_law#United_States



[[Category:Litigation]]
[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]
[[Category:Under construction]]

[[Category:From IntactWiki]]