Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz - Revision history

WikiAdmin: wikify medical indication

2022-08-23T12:25:50Z

wikify medical indication

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 23 August 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	The association speaks out against all forms of [[MGM\|male circumcisions on minors]] that are carried out without compelling medical necessity. The aim of the association is to ensure that boy circumcisions are no longer carried out in Switzerland unless there is an absolute medical necessity. <ref>[http://www.pro-kinderrechte.ch/site/assets/files/1035/statuten.pdf Statute of the association]</ref>		The association speaks out against all forms of [[MGM\|male circumcisions on minors]] that are carried out without compelling medical necessity. The aim of the association is to ensure that boy circumcisions are no longer carried out in Switzerland unless there is an absolute medical necessity. <ref>[http://www.pro-kinderrechte.ch/site/assets/files/1035/statuten.pdf Statute of the association]</ref>

	Since April 2018, the association has been filing criminal charges against doctors who amputate the foreskin of children without medical indication (see [[Art. 122 StGB]]).<ref>{{REFweb		Since April 2018, the association has been filing criminal charges against doctors who amputate the foreskin of children without [[medical indication]] (see [[Art. 122 StGB]]).<ref>{{REFweb
	\|url=https://www.luzernerzeitung.ch/schweiz/beschneidung-koerperverletzung-im-namen-gottes-schweizer-chirurgen-fuehren-heikle-eingriffe-bei-babys-durch-ein-betroffener-erzaehlt-ld.2109811		\|url=https://www.luzernerzeitung.ch/schweiz/beschneidung-koerperverletzung-im-namen-gottes-schweizer-chirurgen-fuehren-heikle-eingriffe-bei-babys-durch-ein-betroffener-erzaehlt-ld.2109811
	\|title=Körperverletzung im Namen Gottes: Schweizer Chirurgen führen heikle Eingriffe bei Babys durch – ein Betroffener erzählt		\|title=Körperverletzung im Namen Gottes: Schweizer Chirurgen führen heikle Eingriffe bei Babys durch – ein Betroffener erzählt

WikiAdmin: wikify

2022-06-15T18:30:56Z

wikify

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 15 June 2022
Line 31:		Line 31:
	In March 2018 the chairman of the association, [[Christoph Geissbühler]], published an extensive ''"Legal assessment of genital circumcision of boys on the basis of medical facts"''. She notes that in Switzerland previously there were mainly four legal assessments on [[amputation]] of the [[foreskin]] in healthy boys, whereby the authors would have assessed the legal situation differently. What all articles have in common, however, is that they hardly consider the medical facts for their own legal assessments and that they sometimes even misrepresent them. The goal achieved by the association was to finally take the medical facts into account appropriately for the legal assessment.		In March 2018 the chairman of the association, [[Christoph Geissbühler]], published an extensive ''"Legal assessment of genital circumcision of boys on the basis of medical facts"''. She notes that in Switzerland previously there were mainly four legal assessments on [[amputation]] of the [[foreskin]] in healthy boys, whereby the authors would have assessed the legal situation differently. What all articles have in common, however, is that they hardly consider the medical facts for their own legal assessments and that they sometimes even misrepresent them. The goal achieved by the association was to finally take the medical facts into account appropriately for the legal assessment.
	{{Citation		{{Citation
	\|Text=It is actually very astonishing that the following legal assessment of the genital circumcision of boys on the basis of medical facts is still needed in an enlightened and secular constitutional state more than 60 years after the proclamation of human rights. Because for sensible and intelligent people it is intuitively completely clear that it is neither legally nor ethically tenable [to] amputate a healthy genital body part from a child.		\|Text=It is actually very astonishing that the following legal assessment of the genital circumcision of boys on the basis of medical facts is still needed in an enlightened and secular constitutional state more than 60 years after the proclamation of [[human rights]]. Because for sensible and intelligent people it is intuitively completely clear that it is neither legally nor ethically tenable [to] amputate a healthy genital body part from a child.
	\|Author=Christoff Geissbühler		\|Author=Christoff Geissbühler
	\|Source=[Legal Assessment of Genital Circumcision of Boys on the Basis of Medical Facts]		\|Source=[Legal Assessment of Genital Circumcision of Boys on the Basis of Medical Facts]

WikiAdmin: wikify amputation

2021-11-13T11:09:42Z

wikify amputation

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:09, 13 November 2021
Line 29:		Line 29:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	In March 2018 the chairman of the association, [[Christoph Geissbühler]], published an extensive ''"Legal assessment of genital circumcision of boys on the basis of medical facts"''. She notes that in Switzerland previously there were mainly four legal assessments on [[~~circumcision\|~~amputation]] of the [[foreskin]] in healthy boys, whereby the authors would have assessed the legal situation differently. What all articles have in common, however, is that they hardly consider the medical facts for their own legal assessments and that they sometimes even misrepresent them. The goal achieved by the association was to finally take the medical facts into account appropriately for the legal assessment.		In March 2018 the chairman of the association, [[Christoph Geissbühler]], published an extensive ''"Legal assessment of genital circumcision of boys on the basis of medical facts"''. She notes that in Switzerland previously there were mainly four legal assessments on [[amputation]] of the [[foreskin]] in healthy boys, whereby the authors would have assessed the legal situation differently. What all articles have in common, however, is that they hardly consider the medical facts for their own legal assessments and that they sometimes even misrepresent them. The goal achieved by the association was to finally take the medical facts into account appropriately for the legal assessment.
	{{Citation		{{Citation
	\|Text=It is actually very astonishing that the following legal assessment of the genital circumcision of boys on the basis of medical facts is still needed in an enlightened and secular constitutional state more than 60 years after the proclamation of human rights. Because for sensible and intelligent people it is intuitively completely clear that it is neither legally nor ethically tenable [to] amputate a healthy genital body part from a child.		\|Text=It is actually very astonishing that the following legal assessment of the genital circumcision of boys on the basis of medical facts is still needed in an enlightened and secular constitutional state more than 60 years after the proclamation of human rights. Because for sensible and intelligent people it is intuitively completely clear that it is neither legally nor ethically tenable [to] amputate a healthy genital body part from a child.

WikiAdmin: added FB page link

2021-05-24T11:46:56Z

added FB page link

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:46, 24 May 2021
Line 45:		Line 45:

	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
	* http://www.pro-kinderrechte.ch/		* {{URLwebsite\|http://www.pro-kinderrechte.ch\|2021-05-24}}
			* {{URL-FBpage\|1531630200447280\|2021-05-24}}

	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

WikiAdmin: sync'ed with German

2021-05-24T11:45:03Z

sync'ed with German

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 The organization '''Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz''' ''(Pro Children's Rights)'' (Switzerland) supports the [[WWDOGA]].
 {{LINKS}}
 * http://www.pro-kinderrechte.ch/
 [[Category:Intactivism organization]]

WikiAdmin at 13:39, 15 September 2019

2019-09-15T13:39:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 15 September 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The organization '''Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz''' ''(Pro Children's Rights)'' (Switzerland) supports the [[WWDOGA]].		The organization '''Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz''' ''(Pro Children's Rights)'' (Switzerland) supports the [[WWDOGA]].

	~~== External Links ==~~		{{LINKS}}
	* http://www.pro-kinderrechte.ch/		* http://www.pro-kinderrechte.ch/

	[[Category:~~Organization~~]]		[[Category:Intactivism organization]]
	[[Category:Switzerland]]		[[Category:Switzerland]]

	[[de:Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz]]		[[de:Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz]]

WikiAdmin at 08:54, 1 September 2018

2018-09-01T08:54:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:54, 1 September 2018
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* http://www.pro-kinderrechte.ch/		* http://www.pro-kinderrechte.ch/

			[[Category:Organization]]
	[[Category:Switzerland]]		[[Category:Switzerland]]

	[[de:Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz]]		[[de:Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz]]

WikiAdmin at 13:22, 18 August 2018

2018-08-18T13:22:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 18 August 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Pro Kinderrechte CH''' ''(Pro Children's Rights)'' (Switzerland) supports the [[WWDOGA]].		The organization '''Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz''' ''(Pro Children's Rights)'' (Switzerland) supports the [[WWDOGA]].

	== External Links ==		== External Links ==
Line 6:		Line 6:
	[[Category:Switzerland]]		[[Category:Switzerland]]

	[[de:Pro Kinderrechte CH]]		[[de:Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz]]

WikiAdmin: WikiAdmin moved page Pro Kinderrechte CH to Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz: organization has been renamed

2018-08-18T13:22:00Z

WikiAdmin moved page Pro Kinderrechte CH to Pro Kinderrechte Schweiz: organization has been renamed

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:22, 18 August 2018
(No difference)

WikiAdmin at 07:26, 10 April 2015

2015-04-10T07:26:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:26, 10 April 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== External Links ==		== External Links ==
	* http://www.pro-kinderrechte.ch/		* http://www.pro-kinderrechte.ch/

			[[Category:Switzerland]]

	[[de:Pro Kinderrechte CH]]		[[de:Pro Kinderrechte CH]]