R. W. Cockshut - Revision history

WikiAdmin: PhotoMissing

2022-11-23T17:08:03Z

PhotoMissing

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:08, 23 November 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{PhotoMissing}}
	Very little has been found about this British Victorian doctor, who practised at Hendon, N.W. London. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.		Very little has been found about this British Victorian doctor, who practised at Hendon, N.W. London. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.

Line 23:		Line 24:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>
	\|Author=[[R. W. Cockshut]]		\|Author=[[R. W. Cockshut]]
	\|Source=~~Circumcision. ''British Medical Journal'', Vol.2 (1935): p.764~~		\|Source=BMJ
			\|ref=<ref name="cockshut1935"/>
	}}		}}

Line 40:		Line 42:
	\|accessdate=2020-12-29		\|accessdate=2020-12-29
	}}		}}

	* {{REFjournal		* {{REFjournal
	\|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20777873		\|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20777873

WikiModEn2: Add category.

2022-09-02T23:00:57Z

Add category.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 2 September 2022
Line 73:		Line 73:
	[[Category:Physician]]		[[Category:Physician]]
	[[Category:Victorian doctor]]		[[Category:Victorian doctor]]
			[[Category:Author]]
	[[Category:History]]		[[Category:History]]

WikiModEn2: Wikify.

2022-06-20T18:06:24Z

Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 20 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Very little has been found about this British Victorian doctor, who practised at Hendon, N.W. London. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.		Very little has been found about this British Victorian doctor, who practised at Hendon, N.W. London. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.

	He is relevant due to a quote from the ''British Medical Journal'', 19 October 1935, where in a letter he calls for all male children to be circumcised to reduce [[masturbation]]. His letter was one of several letters, starting on page 763, regarding child circumcision. In this quote he acknowledges the [[keratinization]] of the [[glans]], consequence of [[circumcision]], and further loss of sensation as ideals for a civilized culture.		He is relevant due to a quote from the ''British Medical Journal'', 19 October 1935, where in a letter he calls for all male children to be [[circumcised]] to reduce [[masturbation]]. His letter was one of several letters, starting on page 763, regarding child [[circumcision]]. In this quote he acknowledges the [[keratinization]] of the [[glans]], consequence of [[circumcision]], and further loss of sensation as ideals for a civilized culture.

	{{Citation		{{Citation
	\|Title=Circumcision		\|Title=Circumcision
	\|Text=I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is "against nature", but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the [[glans]] of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than [[skin]]. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn to his penis much less often. I am convinced that [[masturbation]] is much less common in the circumcised. With these considerations in view it does not seem apt to argue that 'God knows best how to make little boys.'<ref name="cockshut1935">{{REFjournal		\|Text=I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is "against nature", but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the [[glans]] of the [[circumcised]] rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than [[skin]]. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn to his [[penis]] much less often. I am convinced that [[masturbation]] is much less common in the circumcised. With these considerations in view it does not seem apt to argue that 'God knows best how to make little boys.'<ref name="cockshut1935">{{REFjournal
	\|last=Cockshut		\|last=Cockshut
	\|init=RW		\|init=RW

WikiAdmin: added SEEALSO

2022-04-30T12:48:11Z

added SEEALSO

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 30 April 2022
Line 57:		Line 57:
	\|accessdate=2020-12-29		\|accessdate=2020-12-29
	}}		}}

	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}
			* [[Alleged reasons for circumcision]]
	* [[United Kingdom]]		* [[United Kingdom]]

	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

WikiModEn2: Add location of practice.

2022-04-18T18:13:39Z

Add location of practice.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 18 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Very little has been found about this British Victorian doctor. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.		Very little has been found about this British Victorian doctor, who practised at Hendon, N.W. London. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.

	He is relevant due to a quote from the ''British Medical Journal'', 19 October 1935, where in a letter he calls for all male children to be circumcised to reduce [[masturbation]]. His letter was one of several letters, starting on page 763, regarding child circumcision. In this quote he acknowledges the [[keratinization]] of the [[glans]], consequence of [[circumcision]], and further loss of sensation as ideals for a civilized culture.		He is relevant due to a quote from the ''British Medical Journal'', 19 October 1935, where in a letter he calls for all male children to be circumcised to reduce [[masturbation]]. His letter was one of several letters, starting on page 763, regarding child circumcision. In this quote he acknowledges the [[keratinization]] of the [[glans]], consequence of [[circumcision]], and further loss of sensation as ideals for a civilized culture.
Line 11:		Line 11:
	\|etal=no		\|etal=no
	\|title=Circumcision		\|title=Circumcision
	\|journal=~~BMJ~~		\|journal=Brit Med J
	\|location=		\|location=
	\|date=1935-10-19		\|date=1935-10-19
Line 20:		Line 20:
	\|archived=		\|archived=
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	~~\|pubmedID=~~
	~~\|pubmedCID=~~
	~~\|DOI=~~
	\|accessdate=2020-08-25		\|accessdate=2020-08-25
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

WikiModEn2 at 17:11, 18 April 2022

2022-04-18T17:11:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 18 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Very little has been found about this British Victorian doctor. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.		Very little has been found about this British Victorian doctor. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.

	He is relevant due to a quote from the ''British Medical Journal'', 19 October 1935, where in a letter he calls for all male children to be circumcised to reduce [[masturbation]]. His letter was one of several letters starting on page 763 regarding child circumcision. In this quote he acknowledges the [[keratinization]] of the [[glans]], consequence of [[circumcision]], and further loss of sensation as ideals for a civilized culture.		He is relevant due to a quote from the ''British Medical Journal'', 19 October 1935, where in a letter he calls for all male children to be circumcised to reduce [[masturbation]]. His letter was one of several letters, starting on page 763, regarding child circumcision. In this quote he acknowledges the [[keratinization]] of the [[glans]], consequence of [[circumcision]], and further loss of sensation as ideals for a civilized culture.

	{{Citation		{{Citation

WikiModEn2 at 17:09, 18 April 2022

2022-04-18T17:09:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 18 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Very little has been found about this British Victorian doctor. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.		Very little has been found about this British Victorian doctor. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.

	He is relevant due to a quote from the ''British Medical Journal'', 19 October 1935, where in a letter he calls for all male children to be circumcised to reduce [[masturbation]]. In this quote he acknowledges the [[keratinization]] of the [[glans]], consequence of [[circumcision]], and further loss of sensation as ideals for a civilized culture.		He is relevant due to a quote from the ''British Medical Journal'', 19 October 1935, where in a letter he calls for all male children to be circumcised to reduce [[masturbation]]. His letter was one of several letters starting on page 763 regarding child circumcision. In this quote he acknowledges the [[keratinization]] of the [[glans]], consequence of [[circumcision]], and further loss of sensation as ideals for a civilized culture.

	{{Citation		{{Citation

WikiModEn2 at 16:48, 18 April 2022

2022-04-18T16:48:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 18 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Very little has been found about this Victorian doctor. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.		Very little has been found about this British Victorian doctor. In fact, some websites and literature refer him as '''C. W. Cockshut''' and others as '''R. W. Cockshut'''.

	He is relevant due to a quote from the ''British Medical Journal'', 1935, where he calls for all male children to be circumcised to reduce [[masturbation]]. In this quote he acknowledges the [[keratinization]] of the [[glans]], consequence of [[circumcision]], and further loss of sensation as ideals for a civilized culture.		He is relevant due to a quote from the ''British Medical Journal'', 19 October 1935, where in a letter he calls for all male children to be circumcised to reduce [[masturbation]]. In this quote he acknowledges the [[keratinization]] of the [[glans]], consequence of [[circumcision]], and further loss of sensation as ideals for a civilized culture.

	{{Citation		{{Citation

WikiModEn2 at 16:29, 18 April 2022

2022-04-18T16:29:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 18 April 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:

	{{Citation		{{Citation
	\|Title=		\|Title=Circumcision
	\|Text=I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is "against nature", but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the [[glans]] of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than [[skin]]. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn to his penis much less often. I am convinced that [[masturbation]] is much less common in the circumcised. With these considerations in view it does not seem apt to argue that 'God knows best how to make little boys.'<ref name="cockshut1935">{{REFjournal		\|Text=I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is "against nature", but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the [[glans]] of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than [[skin]]. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn to his penis much less often. I am convinced that [[masturbation]] is much less common in the circumcised. With these considerations in view it does not seem apt to argue that 'God knows best how to make little boys.'<ref name="cockshut1935">{{REFjournal
	\|last=Cockshut		\|last=Cockshut

WikiAdmin: wikify skin

2021-12-27T15:13:06Z

wikify skin

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 27 December 2021
Line 5:		Line 5:
	{{Citation		{{Citation
	\|Title=		\|Title=
	\|Text=I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is "against nature", but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the [[glans]] of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than skin. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn to his penis much less often. I am convinced that [[masturbation]] is much less common in the circumcised. With these considerations in view it does not seem apt to argue that 'God knows best how to make little boys.'<ref name="cockshut1935">{{REFjournal		\|Text=I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is "against nature", but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the [[glans]] of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than [[skin]]. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn to his penis much less often. I am convinced that [[masturbation]] is much less common in the circumcised. With these considerations in view it does not seem apt to argue that 'God knows best how to make little boys.'<ref name="cockshut1935">{{REFjournal
	\|last=Cockshut		\|last=Cockshut
	\|init=RW		\|init=RW