Routine Infant Circumcision - Revision history

WikiModEn2 at 12:46, 7 May 2024

2024-05-07T12:46:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:46, 7 May 2024
Line 62:		Line 62:
	}}</ref> Use of the phrase "routine infant circumcision" or "RIC" is a sign of ignorance on the part of the user.		}}</ref> Use of the phrase "routine infant circumcision" or "RIC" is a sign of ignorance on the part of the user.

	[[Circumcision]] of a minor boy currently requires the consent of one parent in the [[United States]], while in the [[United Kingdom]], the consent of both parents is required, so it cannot be done automatically or "routinely".		[[Circumcision]] of a minor boy currently requires the surrogate consent of one parent in the [[United States]], while in the [[United Kingdom]], the surrogate consent of both parents is required, so it cannot be done automatically or "routinely".

	The alleged right of a parent to consent to a non-therapeutic, non-diagnostic surgical [[amputation]] of functional tissue from a boy's [[penis]] has been questioned.<ref name="bioethics">{{REFjournal		The alleged right of a parent to consent to a non-therapeutic, non-diagnostic surgical [[amputation]] of functional tissue from a boy's [[penis]] has been questioned.<ref name="bioethics">{{REFjournal
Line 92:		Line 92:
	* [[Informed consent]]		* [[Informed consent]]
	* [[NNMC]]		* [[NNMC]]
			* [[United States of America]]

	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}

WikiModEn2 at 12:42, 7 May 2024

2024-05-07T12:42:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 7 May 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Mainly in the [[United States]], boys formerly were [[circumcised]] without [[Informed consent]] in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously.		Mainly in the [[United States]], boys formerly were [[circumcised]] without [[Informed consent]] in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously.

	The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' (done automatically as a standard practice) since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref> Anyone who uses the term routine infant circumcision today is displaying their ignorance.		The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' (done automatically as a standard practice) since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref> Anyone who uses the term ''routine infant circumcision'' today is displaying their ignorance.

	Routine infant circumcision (i. e. non-therapeutic circumcision without consent) is an unlawful procedure for which damages may be recovered.<ref name="llewellnyn1995">{{REFjournal		Routine infant circumcision (i. e. non-therapeutic circumcision without consent) is an unlawful procedure for which damages may be recovered.<ref name="llewellnyn1995">{{REFjournal
Line 62:		Line 62:
	}}</ref> Use of the phrase "routine infant circumcision" or "RIC" is a sign of ignorance on the part of the user.		}}</ref> Use of the phrase "routine infant circumcision" or "RIC" is a sign of ignorance on the part of the user.

	[[Circumcision]] of a minor boy currently requires the consent of a parent in the [[United States]], while in the [[United Kingdom]], the consent of both parents is required, so it cannot be done automatically or "routinely".		[[Circumcision]] of a minor boy currently requires the consent of one parent in the [[United States]], while in the [[United Kingdom]], the consent of both parents is required, so it cannot be done automatically or "routinely".

	The alleged right of a parent to consent to a non-therapeutic, non-diagnostic surgical [[amputation]] of functional tissue from a boy's [[penis]] has been questioned.<ref name="bioethics">{{REFjournal		The alleged right of a parent to consent to a non-therapeutic, non-diagnostic surgical [[amputation]] of functional tissue from a boy's [[penis]] has been questioned.<ref name="bioethics">{{REFjournal

WikiModEn2 at 12:04, 7 May 2024

2024-05-07T12:04:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 7 May 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the name for a surgical procedure that was outlawed by court decisions in the [[United States]] more than 1/2 century age. '''RIC''' is an acronym for '''R'''outine '''I'''nfant '''C'''ircumcision.		'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the name for a surgical procedure that was outlawed by court decisions in the [[United States]] more than 1/2 century age. '''RIC''' is an acronym for '''R'''outine '''I'''nfant '''C'''ircumcision.

	Mainly in the [[United States]], boys formerly were [[circumcised]] without [[Informed consent]] in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously ~~at all~~.		Mainly in the [[United States]], boys formerly were [[circumcised]] without [[Informed consent]] in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously.

	The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' (done automatically as a standard practice) since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref> Anyone who uses the term routine infant circumcision today is displaying their ignorance.		The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' (done automatically as a standard practice) since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref> Anyone who uses the term routine infant circumcision today is displaying their ignorance.

WikiModEn2: Revise text.

2024-05-07T12:03:34Z

Revise text.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:03, 7 May 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the name for a surgical procedure that ~~wasa been~~ outlawed in the [[United States]] more than 1/2 century age. '''RIC''' is an acronym for '''R'''outine '''I'''nfant '''C'''ircumcision.		'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the name for a surgical procedure that was outlawed by court decisions in the [[United States]] more than 1/2 century age. '''RIC''' is an acronym for '''R'''outine '''I'''nfant '''C'''ircumcision.

	Mainly in the [[United States]], boys formerly were [[circumcised]] without [[Informed consent]] in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.		Mainly in the [[United States]], boys formerly were [[circumcised]] without [[Informed consent]] in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.

WikiModEn2 at 02:08, 6 May 2024

2024-05-06T02:08:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:08, 6 May 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''RIC''' is an acronym for '''R'''outine '''I'''nfant '''C'''ircumcision.		'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the name for a surgical procedure that wasa been outlawed in the [[United States]] more than 1/2 century age. '''RIC''' is an acronym for '''R'''outine '''I'''nfant '''C'''ircumcision.

	Mainly in the [[United States]], boys formerly were [[circumcised]] in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.		Mainly in the [[United States]], boys formerly were [[circumcised]] without [[Informed consent]] in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.

	The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' (done automatically as a standard practice) since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref>		The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' (done automatically as a standard practice) since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref> Anyone who uses the term routine infant circumcision today is displaying their ignorance.

	Routine infant circumcision (i. e. non-therapeutic circumcision without consent) is an unlawful procedure for which damages may be recovered.<ref name="llewellnyn1995">{{REFjournal		Routine infant circumcision (i. e. non-therapeutic circumcision without consent) is an unlawful procedure for which damages may be recovered.<ref name="llewellnyn1995">{{REFjournal
Line 20:		Line 20:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	Routine infant circumcision no longer exists in the United States, except when a hospital or doctor makes an error for which they can be sued. The phrase is outmoded and inaccurate so it should not be used to refer to non-therapeutic circumcision of boys. The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] declared non-therapeutic infant circumcision to be an ''elective'' surgery decades ago (1989).<ref name="aap1989">{{REFjournal		Routine infant circumcision no longer exists in the [[United States]], except when a hospital or doctor makes an error for which they can be sued. The phrase is outmoded and inaccurate so it should not be used to refer to non-therapeutic circumcision of boys. The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] declared non-therapeutic infant circumcision to be an ''elective'' surgery decades ago (1989).<ref name="aap1989">{{REFjournal
	\|last=Schoen		\|last=Schoen
	\|first=Edgar J.		\|first=Edgar J.

WikiModEn2: Add category.

2023-12-28T15:54:11Z

Add category.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 28 December 2023
Line 120:		Line 120:
	[[Category:Acronym]]		[[Category:Acronym]]
	[[Category:Law]]		[[Category:Law]]

			[[Category:USA]]

	[[de:Routinemäßige Jungen-Beschneidung]]		[[de:Routinemäßige Jungen-Beschneidung]]

WikiModEn2: Revise text; Wikify.

2022-10-01T21:22:16Z

Revise text; Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 1 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''RIC''' is an acronym for '''R'''outine '''I'''nfant '''C'''ircumcision.		'''RIC''' is an acronym for '''R'''outine '''I'''nfant '''C'''ircumcision.

	Mainly in the United States, boys formerly were circumcised in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.		Mainly in the [[United States]], boys formerly were [[circumcised]] in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.

	The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' (done automatically as a standard practice) since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref>		The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' (done automatically as a standard practice) since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref>
Line 64:		Line 64:
	[[Circumcision]] of a minor boy currently requires the consent of a parent in the [[United States]], while in the [[United Kingdom]], the consent of both parents is required, so it cannot be done automatically or "routinely".		[[Circumcision]] of a minor boy currently requires the consent of a parent in the [[United States]], while in the [[United Kingdom]], the consent of both parents is required, so it cannot be done automatically or "routinely".

	The right of a parent to consent to a non-therapeutic, non-diagnostic surgical [[amputation]] of functional tissue has been questioned.<ref name="bioethics">{{REFjournal		The alleged right of a parent to consent to a non-therapeutic, non-diagnostic surgical [[amputation]] of functional tissue from a boy's [[penis]] has been questioned.<ref name="bioethics">{{REFjournal
	\|last=Committee on Bioethics		\|last=Committee on Bioethics
	\|title=Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice		\|title=Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice

WikiModEn2: Revise text for clarity.

2022-07-09T11:19:54Z

Revise text for clarity.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 9 July 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''RIC''' is an acronym for '''R'''outine '''I'''nfant '''C'''ircumcision.		'''RIC''' is an acronym for '''R'''outine '''I'''nfant '''C'''ircumcision.

	Mainly in the United States, boys were circumcised in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.		Mainly in the United States, boys formerly were circumcised in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.

	The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' (done automatically as a standard practice) since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref>		The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' (done automatically as a standard practice) since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref>
Line 62:		Line 62:
	}}</ref> Use of the phrase "routine infant circumcision" or "RIC" is a sign of ignorance on the part of the user.		}}</ref> Use of the phrase "routine infant circumcision" or "RIC" is a sign of ignorance on the part of the user.

	[[Circumcision]] of a minor boy currently requires the consent of a parent in the [[United States]], while in the [[United Kingdom]], the consent of both parents is required.		[[Circumcision]] of a minor boy currently requires the consent of a parent in the [[United States]], while in the [[United Kingdom]], the consent of both parents is required, so it cannot be done automatically or "routinely".

	The right of a parent to consent to a non-therapeutic, non-diagnostic surgical [[amputation]] of functional tissue has been questioned.<ref name="bioethics">{{REFjournal		The right of a parent to consent to a non-therapeutic, non-diagnostic surgical [[amputation]] of functional tissue has been questioned.<ref name="bioethics">{{REFjournal

WikiModEn2: Add clarifying text.

2022-01-27T17:53:19Z

Add clarifying text.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 27 January 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Mainly in the United States, boys were circumcised in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.		Mainly in the United States, boys were circumcised in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.

	The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref>		The word ''routine'', when applied to non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' (done automatically as a standard practice) since court rulings started to require [[informed consent]] in 1972.<ref>[https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/250 Canterbury v. Spence], 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)</ref>

	Routine infant circumcision (i. e. non-therapeutic circumcision without consent) is an unlawful procedure for which damages may be recovered.<ref name="llewellnyn1995">{{REFjournal		Routine infant circumcision (i. e. non-therapeutic circumcision without consent) is an unlawful procedure for which damages may be recovered.<ref name="llewellnyn1995">{{REFjournal

WikiAdmin: wikify

2022-01-14T15:57:04Z

wikify

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 14 January 2022
Line 95:		Line 95:
	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
	* {{REFjournal		* {{REFjournal
	\|last=~~Svobody~~		\|last=Svoboda
	\|first=J. Steven		\|first=J. Steven
	\|init=JS		\|init=JS
			\|author-link=J. Steven Svoboda
	\|last2=Van Howe		\|last2=Van Howe
	\|first2=Robert S.		\|first2=Robert S.
	\|init2=RS		\|init2=RS
			\|author2-link=Robert S. Van Howe
	\|last3=Dwyer		\|last3=Dwyer
	\|first3=James G.		\|first3=James G.