Sexual injury of circumcision - Revision history

WikiModEn2: /* Sexual practice and masturbation */ Add text and citation.

2026-03-12T21:07:59Z

Sexual practice and masturbation: Add text and citation.

@@ Line 627: / Line 627: @@
 Published: April 2, 1997.  New York Times. [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9C07E4D91F3AF931A35757C0A961958260]</ref>
-Fink et al. (2002) did not find a change in sexual activity with adult circumcision (p=0.22).<ref name="fink2002"/>
+Fink et al. (2002) did not find a change in sexual activity with adult circumcision (p=0.22),<ref name="fink2002"/> but Andersen-Giberson (2025) reported that circumcision caused loss of self-pleasure and sexual disability.<ref name="andersen2025">{{REFjournal
 == Sexual drive ==

WikiModEn2: /* Effect of circumcision on heterosexual relations */ Add link in SEEALSO section.

2025-09-25T21:47:53Z

Effect of circumcision on heterosexual relations: Add link in SEEALSO section.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 25 September 2025
Line 903:		Line 903:
	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}
	* [[Circumcision]]		* [[Circumcision]]
			* [[Circumcision: Effect upon erectile function]]
	* [[Dyspareunia]]		* [[Dyspareunia]]
	* [[Foreskin]]		* [[Foreskin]]

WikiModEn2: WikiModEn2 moved page Sexual effects of circumcision to Sexual injury of circumcision

2025-08-29T22:41:45Z

WikiModEn2 moved page Sexual effects of circumcision to Sexual injury of circumcision

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:41, 29 August 2025
(No difference)

WikiModEn2: Add external link.

2025-07-27T22:50:40Z

Add external link.

@@ Line 999: / Line 999: @@
   |accessdate=2024-06-21
 }}
 {{ABBR}}
 {{REF}}

WikiModEn2: /* Effect of circumcision on heterosexual relations */ Add external link.

2025-06-28T15:26:32Z

Effect of circumcision on heterosexual relations: Add external link.

@@ Line 917: / Line 917: @@
 {{LINKS}}
 * {{REFweb
   |url=https://intactamerica.org/lousy-sex/

WikiModEn2 at 13:12, 18 December 2024

2024-12-18T13:12:40Z

@@ Line 874: / Line 874: @@
 </blockquote>
 {{SEEALSO}}
 * [[Circumcision]]

WikiModEn2: /* Female preferences and response */

2024-12-15T17:26:13Z

Female preferences and response

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 15 December 2024
Line 731:		Line 731:
	\|date=1976		\|date=1976
	\|accessdate=		\|accessdate=
	}}</ref> (There were very few [[intact]] males in Georgia in 1976 because of the prevalence of non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]] so it is quite likely that few of the subjects tested had any experience with an [[~~intact~~]] male.)		}}</ref> (There were very few [[intact]] males in Georgia in 1976 because of the prevalence of non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]] so it is quite likely that few of the subjects tested had any experience with a [[foreskinned]] male.)

	Williamson et al. (1988) studied randomly selected young mothers in Iowa, where most men are [[circumcised]], and found that 76% would prefer a [[circumcised]] penis for achieving sexual arousal through viewing it.<ref>[http://www.circs.org/library/williamson/index.html Williamson ML, Williamson PS. Women's Preferences for Penile Circumcision in Sexual Partners.] J Sex Educ Ther 1988; 14: 8</ref> There were very few [[intact]] males in Iowa in 1988 because of the prevalence of non-therapeutic infant circumcision so it is quite likely that few of the subjects tested had any experience with an intact male.)		Williamson et al. (1988) studied randomly selected young mothers in Iowa, where most men are [[circumcised]], and found that 76% would prefer a [[circumcised]] penis for achieving sexual arousal through viewing it.<ref>[http://www.circs.org/library/williamson/index.html Williamson ML, Williamson PS. Women's Preferences for Penile Circumcision in Sexual Partners.] J Sex Educ Ther 1988; 14: 8</ref> There were very few [[intact]] males in Iowa in 1988 because of the prevalence of non-therapeutic infant circumcision so it is quite likely that few of the subjects tested had any experience with an intact male.)

WikiModEn2: /* In the beginning */

2024-12-13T21:19:33Z

In the beginning

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 13 December 2024
Line 17:		Line 17:
	\|year=1948		\|year=1948
	\|title=Sexual Behavior in the Human Male		\|title=Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
	\|url=		\|url=https://ia801508.us.archive.org/33/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.187552/2015.187552.Sexual-Behavior-In-The-Human-Male_text.pdf
	\|work=		\|work=
	\|editor=		\|editor=
Line 24:		Line 24:
	\|chapter=		\|chapter=
	\|pages=		\|pages=
	\|location=		\|location=Bloomington
	\|publisher=A. C. Saunders		\|publisher=W.B. Saunders
	\|isbn=		\|isbn=
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	\|accessdate=2019-12-21		\|accessdate=2019-12-21
	\|note=		\|note=
			\|format=PDF
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

Line 56:		Line 57:
	\|chapter=		\|chapter=
	\|pages=		\|pages=
	\|location=~~Toronto, New York~~		\|location=Boston
	\|publisher=~~Bantam~~		\|publisher=Little, Brown, and Company
	\|isbn=0-553-20429-7		\|isbn=0-553-20429-7
	\|quote=		\|quote=

WikiModEn2: /* Penile sensitivity and sexual sensation */ Add citation.

2024-10-22T15:18:46Z

Penile sensitivity and sexual sensation: Add citation.

@@ Line 322: / Line 322: @@
   |DOI=10.1111/joa.13481
   |accessdate=2021-11-15
 }}</ref> Proponents of [[genital integrity]] have cited these studies, which report on the sensitivity or innervation of the foreskin, claiming a sexual role based upon the presence of nerve-endings in the foreskin sensitive to light touch, stroking and fluttering sensations.

WikiModEn2: /* Effect of circumcision on heterosexual relations */ Wikify.

2024-09-22T02:25:30Z

Effect of circumcision on heterosexual relations: Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:25, 22 September 2024
Line 806:		Line 806:
	\|DOI=		\|DOI=
	\|accessdate=2020-01-04		\|accessdate=2020-01-04
	}}</ref> so the lack of the foreskin in the circumcised partner renders the female experience less satisfactory.		}}</ref> so the lack of the foreskin in the [[circumcised]] partner renders the female experience less satisfactory.

	In a first of its kind, O'Hara & O'Hara (1999) carried out a retrospective survey of 138 women with experience of both [[intact]] and [[circumcised]] partners. The women overwhelmingly concurred that the mechanics of coitus was different for the two groups of men. Of the women, 73% reported that [[circumcised]] men tend to thrust harder and deeper, using elongated strokes, while unaltered men by comparison tended to thrust more gently, to have shorter thrusts, and tended to be in contact with the mons pubis and [[clitoris]] more, according to 71% of the respondents. Women with intact partners had a higher rate of orgasms than women with [[circumcised]] partners. O'Hara & O'Hara concluded:		In a first of its kind, O'Hara & O'Hara (1999) carried out a retrospective survey of 138 women with experience of both [[intact]] and [[circumcised]] partners. The women overwhelmingly concurred that the mechanics of coitus was different for the two groups of men. Of the women, 73% reported that [[circumcised]] men tend to thrust harder and deeper, using elongated strokes, while unaltered men by comparison tended to thrust more gently, to have shorter thrusts, and tended to be in contact with the mons pubis and [[clitoris]] more, according to 71% of the respondents. Women with intact partners had a higher rate of orgasms than women with [[circumcised]] partners. O'Hara & O'Hara concluded: