https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AThomas_E._Wiswell 2026-04-17T19:36:42Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.45.1 https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thomas_E._Wiswell&diff=5218&oldid=prev 2019-09-04T14:14:41Z

<p>Created page with &quot;== Premature babies == If I&#039;m correct, didn&#039;t Wiswell basically follow around premature babies at military hospitals? Babies that would already have a higher risk of UTIs any...&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>== Premature babies ==<br /> <br /> If I&#039;m correct, didn&#039;t Wiswell basically follow around premature babies at military hospitals? Babies that would already have a higher risk of UTIs anyway because of their premature state? If these studies have been refuted, WHY do circumcision advocates like Brian Morris keep quoting them? Has this news simply not reached them?[[User:Orly21|Orly21]] 18:52, 9 March 2011 (CST)<br /> <br /> :I think the intact babies where intact because they were premature. In the 80s children where left intact for reason of fragile health. They also have some newer better BS meta-anaysies they have been pushing.[[User:ChaosCraig|ChaosCraig]] 23:40, 9 March 2011 (CST)<br /> <br /> &lt;!-- {{REF}} --&gt;<br /> <br /> [[Category:From IntactWiki]]</div>

WikiAdmin