The stigma associated with foreskin restoration - Revision history

WikiModEn2: Add SEEALSO section.

2026-06-23T21:21:50Z

Add SEEALSO section.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 23 June 2026
Line 21:		Line 21:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	The American public has been bombarded with pro-circumcision propaganda by the [[circumcision industry]] for nearly 1 and 1/2 centuries. As a result, the public in the [[United States]] regarding the [[circumcised]] penis as normal, healthy, and clean, while the normal [[intact]] penis is regarded abnormal, unhealthy, and unclean. A man who is restoring his [[foreskin]] is likely to be viewed as "wacko", "perverted", or "un-American".<ref name="hartelt2018" />		The American public has been bombarded with pro-circumcision propaganda by the [[circumcision industry]] for nearly 1 and 1/2 centuries. As a result, the public in the [[United States]] regarding the [[circumcised]] partial penis as normal, healthy, and clean, while the normal, healthy [[intact]] penis is regarded abnormal, unhealthy, and unclean. A man who is restoring his [[foreskin]] is likely to be viewed as "wacko", "perverted", or "un-American".<ref name="hartelt2018" />

	Consequently, [[circumcised]] men who decide to restore their [[foreskin]] are very likely to do so privately without public announcement of their restoration activities.		Consequently, [[circumcised]] men who decide to restore their [[foreskin]] are very likely to do so privately without public announcement of their restoration activities.

	The number of men who are actually restoring their pilfered prepuce is likely to be much larger than the public perception.		The number of men who are actually restoring their pilfered prepuce is likely to be much larger than the public perception.
			{{SEEALSO}}
			* [[Foreskin]]
			* [[Foreskin restoration]]
			* [[Penis]]
			* [[Stretching]]

	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

WikiModEn2 at 16:39, 23 June 2026

2026-06-23T16:39:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 23 June 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\|trans-title=		\|trans-title=
	\|language=		\|language=
	\|url=https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd~~/2475~~		\|url=https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3504&context=etd
	\|archived=		\|archived=
	\|contribution=		\|contribution=
Line 22:		Line 22:

	The American public has been bombarded with pro-circumcision propaganda by the [[circumcision industry]] for nearly 1 and 1/2 centuries. As a result, the public in the [[United States]] regarding the [[circumcised]] penis as normal, healthy, and clean, while the normal [[intact]] penis is regarded abnormal, unhealthy, and unclean. A man who is restoring his [[foreskin]] is likely to be viewed as "wacko", "perverted", or "un-American".<ref name="hartelt2018" />		The American public has been bombarded with pro-circumcision propaganda by the [[circumcision industry]] for nearly 1 and 1/2 centuries. As a result, the public in the [[United States]] regarding the [[circumcised]] penis as normal, healthy, and clean, while the normal [[intact]] penis is regarded abnormal, unhealthy, and unclean. A man who is restoring his [[foreskin]] is likely to be viewed as "wacko", "perverted", or "un-American".<ref name="hartelt2018" />

			Consequently, [[circumcised]] men who decide to restore their [[foreskin]] are very likely to do so privately without public announcement of their restoration activities.

			The number of men who are actually restoring their pilfered prepuce is likely to be much larger than the public perception.

	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

WikiModEn2: Add text and Wikify.

2026-06-23T15:18:30Z

Add text and Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 23 June 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Joshua Hartelt, a graduate student at [https://www.sdstate.edu/ South Dakota State University], has produced a thesis for his master's degree.		Joshua Hartelt, a graduate student at [https://www.sdstate.edu/ South Dakota State University], has produced a thesis for his master's degree.

	In the thesis, he describes a stigma associated with [[foreskin restoration]].<ref name="hartelt2018.>{{REFdocument		In the thesis, he describes a stigma associated with [[foreskin restoration]].<ref name="hartelt2018">{{REFdocument
	\|title="I Don't Want to Hear About Your Dick": Communicatively"I Don't Want to Hear About Your Dick":		\|title="I Don't Want to Hear About Your Dick": Communicatively"I Don't Want to Hear About Your Dick":
	\|trans-title=		\|trans-title=
Line 20:		Line 20:
	\|accessdate=2026-06-22		\|accessdate=2026-06-22
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

			The American public has been bombarded with pro-circumcision propaganda by the [[circumcision industry]] for nearly 1 and 1/2 centuries. As a result, the public in the [[United States]] regarding the [[circumcised]] penis as normal, healthy, and clean, while the normal [[intact]] penis is regarded abnormal, unhealthy, and unclean. A man who is restoring his [[foreskin]] is likely to be viewed as "wacko", "perverted", or "un-American".<ref name="hartelt2018" />

	{{REF}}		{{REF}}

WikiModEn2: Add text.

2026-06-22T20:16:16Z

Add text.

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:16, 22 June 2026
Line 1:	Line 1:
		Joshua Hartelt, a graduate student at [https://www.sdstate.edu/ South Dakota State University], has produced a thesis for his master's degree.

		In the thesis, he describes a stigma associated with [[foreskin restoration]].<ref name="hartelt2018.>{{REFdocument
		\|title="I Don't Want to Hear About Your Dick": Communicatively"I Don't Want to Hear About Your Dick":
		\|trans-title=
		\|language=
		\|url=https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/2475
		\|archived=
		\|contribution=
		\|quote=
		\|trans-quote=
		\|quote-lang=
		\|last=Hartelt
		\|first=Joshua
		\|author-link=
		\|publisher=South Dakota State University
		\|location=Brookings, South Dakota
		\|format=
		\|date=2018
		\|accessdate=2026-06-22
		}}</ref>

		{{REF}}


		[[Category:Foreskin restoration]]
		[[Category:Psychology]]

		[[Category:USA]]

WikiModEn2: Create blank page.

2026-06-22T20:14:48Z

Create blank page.

New page