William Stowell - Revision history

WikiModEn2: Wikify.

2025-05-15T02:04:04Z

Wikify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 15 May 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	He was represented by [[David J. Llewellyn]] of Atlanta, Georgia.		He was represented by [[David J. Llewellyn]] of Atlanta, Georgia.

	Stowell argued that the consent given by his mother was invalid because she was heavily drugged at the time. She would not otherwise have granted consent for circumcision.		Stowell argued that the consent given by his mother was invalid because she was heavily drugged at the time. She would not otherwise have granted consent for [[circumcision]].

	Due to statutes of limitation, such suits must be filed shortly after one reaches the age of majority.		Due to statutes of limitation, such suits must be filed shortly after one reaches the age of majority.

WikiModEn2: Revise citation.

2024-07-10T21:03:44Z

Revise citation.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 10 July 2024
Line 34:		Line 34:
	}}		}}
	* {{REFnews		* {{REFnews
	\|title=~~The Penis Page~~		\|title=William Stowell sues doctor and hospital for circumcision battery
	\|url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2001/2001-11-01_penthouse.php		\|url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2001/2001-11-01_penthouse.php
	\|last=Chester-Taxin		\|last=Chester-Taxin

WikiModEn2: Add link in SEEALSO section.

2024-05-08T00:15:14Z

Add link in SEEALSO section.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 8 May 2024
Line 13:		Line 13:
	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}
	* [[Circumcision legal commentary]]		* [[Circumcision legal commentary]]
			* [[United States of America]]
	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}
	* {{REFweb		* {{REFweb

WikiAdmin: removed information due to Stowell's request

2023-10-31T10:16:05Z

removed information due to Stowell's request

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:16, 31 October 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[[File:WilliamStowell.png\|thumb\|William Stowell]]~~		'''William Stowell''' brought a suit in federal court against Frank P. Cariello, the obstetrician who [[circumcision\|circumcised]] him as an infant and against [https://goodsamaritan.chsli.org/ Good Samaritan Hospital] of West Islip, New York. Stowell's suit was settled out of court in 2003 and does not constitute a legal precedent. The cash settlement is confidential, so it has not been revealed.
	'''William Stowell''' ~~is the young man who~~ brought a suit in federal court against Frank P. Cariello, the obstetrician who [[circumcision\|circumcised]] him as an infant and against [https://goodsamaritan.chsli.org/ Good Samaritan Hospital] of West Islip, New York. Stowell's suit was settled out of court in 2003 and does not constitute a legal precedent. The cash settlement is confidential, so it has not been revealed.

	He was represented by [[David J. Llewellyn]] of Atlanta, Georgia.		He was represented by [[David J. Llewellyn]] of Atlanta, Georgia.
Line 8:		Line 7:
	Due to statutes of limitation, such suits must be filed shortly after one reaches the age of majority.		Due to statutes of limitation, such suits must be filed shortly after one reaches the age of majority.

	== ~~Videos~~ ==		== Video ==
	~~=== Circumcised - Sues and Wins ===~~
	~~<youtube>v=H8szj1jFCWM</youtube>~~

	=== Sues After Forced Circumcision ===		=== Sues After Forced Circumcision ===
	<youtube>v=MMCaO1SW-dE&feature=watch_response</youtube>		<youtube>v=MMCaO1SW-dE&feature=watch_response</youtube>
Line 21:		Line 17:
	* {{REFweb		* {{REFweb
	\|url=http://www.circumstitions.com/Law.html		\|url=http://www.circumstitions.com/Law.html
	~~\|archived=~~
	\|title=Man Sues for Being Circumcised as an Infant		\|title=Man Sues for Being Circumcised as an Infant
	~~\|trans-title=~~
	~~\|language=English~~
	~~\|last=~~
	~~\|first=~~
	~~\|author-link=~~
	\|publisher=Attorneys for the Rights of the Child		\|publisher=Attorneys for the Rights of the Child
	\|website=http://www.circumstitions.com		\|website=http://www.circumstitions.com
	\|date=2000-12-20		\|date=2000-12-20
	\|accessdate=2020-06-07		\|accessdate=2020-06-07
	~~\|format=~~
	\|quote=This case highlights the travesty of infant circumcision, which seriously breaches the child’s right to bodily integrity and is incompatible with the doctor’s legal and ethical duties toward the child patient. Circumcising a child without medical necessity is criminal assault. All physicians and hospitals that currently circumcise males without medical justification would be wise to reconsider this practice.		\|quote=This case highlights the travesty of infant circumcision, which seriously breaches the child’s right to bodily integrity and is incompatible with the doctor’s legal and ethical duties toward the child patient. Circumcising a child without medical necessity is criminal assault. All physicians and hospitals that currently circumcise males without medical justification would be wise to reconsider this practice.
	}}		}}
Line 38:		Line 27:
	\|title=Man Sues For Loss of Foreskin		\|title=Man Sues For Loss of Foreskin
	\|url=http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=127183		\|url=http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=127183
	~~\|last=~~
	~~\|first=~~
	~~\|coauthors=~~
	\|publisher=ABC News		\|publisher=ABC News
	\|website=abcnews.go.com		\|website=abcnews.go.com
Line 49:		Line 35:
	* {{REFnews		* {{REFnews
	\|title=The Penis Page		\|title=The Penis Page
	\|url=~~http~~://www.cirp.org/news/~~penthouse11~~-01-~~01/~~		\|url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2001/2001-11-01_penthouse.php
	\|last=Chester-Taxin		\|last=Chester-Taxin
	\|first=Sharon		\|first=Sharon
	~~\|coauthors=~~
	\|publisher=Penthouse		\|publisher=Penthouse
	\|website=www.cirp.org		\|website=www.cirp.org
Line 79:		Line 64:

	[[Category:Person]]		[[Category:Person]]

	[[Category:Male]]		[[Category:Male]]
	~~[[Category:Intactivist]]~~

	~~[[Category:USA]]~~

	[[Category:'... v. ...']]		[[Category:'... v. ...']]
Line 89:		Line 70:
	[[Category:Litigation]]		[[Category:Litigation]]
	[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]		[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]

			[[Category:USA]]

	[[Category:From IntactWiki]]		[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

WikiAdmin: added photo

2022-08-01T09:35:08Z

added photo

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:35, 1 August 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{PhotoMissing}}~~		[[File:WilliamStowell.png\|thumb\|William Stowell]]
	'''William Stowell''' is the young man who brought a suit in federal court against Frank P. Cariello, the obstetrician who [[circumcision\|circumcised]] him as an infant and against [https://goodsamaritan.chsli.org/ Good Samaritan Hospital] of West Islip, New York. Stowell's suit was settled out of court in 2003 and does not constitute a legal precedent. The cash settlement is confidential, so it has not been revealed.		'''William Stowell''' is the young man who brought a suit in federal court against Frank P. Cariello, the obstetrician who [[circumcision\|circumcised]] him as an infant and against [https://goodsamaritan.chsli.org/ Good Samaritan Hospital] of West Islip, New York. Stowell's suit was settled out of court in 2003 and does not constitute a legal precedent. The cash settlement is confidential, so it has not been revealed.

WikiAdmin: formattings

2022-07-21T05:38:15Z

formattings

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:38, 21 July 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Due to statutes of limitation, such suits must be filed shortly after one reaches the age of majority.		Due to statutes of limitation, such suits must be filed shortly after one reaches the age of majority.

	==~~Video~~==		== Videos ==
	~~<center>~~		=== Circumcised - Sues and Wins ===
	~~<br>~~		<youtube>v=H8szj1jFCWM</youtube>
	* <youtube>v=H8szj1jFCWM</youtube>
	~~<br>~~		=== Sues After Forced Circumcision ===
	* <youtube>v=MMCaO1SW-dE&feature=watch_response</youtube>		<youtube>v=MMCaO1SW-dE&feature=watch_response</youtube>
	~~<br></center>~~
	{{SEEALSO}}		{{SEEALSO}}
	* [[Circumcision legal commentary]]		* [[Circumcision legal commentary]]

	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}

	* {{REFweb		* {{REFweb
	\|url=}http://www.circumstitions.com/Law.html		\|url=http://www.circumstitions.com/Law.html
	\|archived=		\|archived=
	\|title=Man Sues for Being Circumcised as an Infant		\|title=Man Sues for Being Circumcised as an Infant
Line 33:		Line 33:
	\|accessdate=2020-06-07		\|accessdate=2020-06-07
	\|format=		\|format=
	\|quote=This case highlights the travesty of infant circumcision, which seriously breaches the child’s right to bodily integrity and is incompatible with the doctor’s legal and ethical duties toward the child patient. Circumcising a child without medical necessity is criminal assault. All physicians and hospitals that currently circumcise males without medical justification would be wise to reconsider this practice.}}		\|quote=This case highlights the travesty of infant circumcision, which seriously breaches the child’s right to bodily integrity and is incompatible with the doctor’s legal and ethical duties toward the child patient. Circumcising a child without medical necessity is criminal assault. All physicians and hospitals that currently circumcise males without medical justification would be wise to reconsider this practice.
			}}
	* {{REFnews		* {{REFnews
	\|title=Man Sues For Loss of Foreskin		\|title=Man Sues For Loss of Foreskin
Line 45:		Line 45:
	\|date=2001-03-12		\|date=2001-03-12
	\|accessdate=2020-01-06		\|accessdate=2020-01-06
	\|quote=Stowell's case was filed in December; the hospital responded with a motion to dismiss. In it's motion, the hospital claims there is a 10-year statute of limitations on medical malpractice suits. However, Llewellyn responds that in the state of New York, the clock doesn't start ticking until a person turns 18.}}		\|quote=Stowell's case was filed in December; the hospital responded with a motion to dismiss. In it's motion, the hospital claims there is a 10-year statute of limitations on medical malpractice suits. However, Llewellyn responds that in the state of New York, the clock doesn't start ticking until a person turns 18.
			}}
	* {{REFnews		* {{REFnews
	\|title=The Penis Page		\|title=The Penis Page
Line 59:		Line 59:
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	}}		}}

	* {{REFweb		* {{REFweb
	\|url=http://www.arclaw.org/resources/press-releases/nocirc-arc-press-release-re-stowell-case		\|url=http://www.arclaw.org/resources/press-releases/nocirc-arc-press-release-re-stowell-case
Line 76:		Line 75:
	\|quote=David J. Llewellyn, one of Plaintiff Stowell’s attorneys, said, “William and I are very happy that we were able to resolve this case with both the hospital and the doctor. While a settlement is never an admission of liability, I believe it shows that our allegations were taken seriously. Never again can someone say that a young man who is dissatisfied with his circumcision as an infant is being frivolous when he objects to his mutilation and brings suit to obtain justice. This case should send a message to doctors that they run the risk of a lawsuit each time they circumcise an infant for non-therapeutic reasons, particularly when they rely on the hospital to obtain consent the day after birth. Social or cosmetic concerns provide no justification for harmful surgery. I would expect that this is just the first of many cases that will be brought by angry circumcised young men against their circumcisers.”		\|quote=David J. Llewellyn, one of Plaintiff Stowell’s attorneys, said, “William and I are very happy that we were able to resolve this case with both the hospital and the doctor. While a settlement is never an admission of liability, I believe it shows that our allegations were taken seriously. Never again can someone say that a young man who is dissatisfied with his circumcision as an infant is being frivolous when he objects to his mutilation and brings suit to obtain justice. This case should send a message to doctors that they run the risk of a lawsuit each time they circumcise an infant for non-therapeutic reasons, particularly when they rely on the hospital to obtain consent the day after birth. Social or cosmetic concerns provide no justification for harmful surgery. I would expect that this is just the first of many cases that will be brought by angry circumcised young men against their circumcisers.”
	}}		}}


	{{DEFAULTSORT:Stowell, William}}		{{DEFAULTSORT:Stowell, William}}

WikiModEn2 at 15:42, 20 July 2022

2022-07-20T15:42:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 20 July 2022
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* <youtube>v=MMCaO1SW-dE&feature=watch_response</youtube>		* <youtube>v=MMCaO1SW-dE&feature=watch_response</youtube>
	<br></center>		<br></center>
			{{SEEALSO}}
			* [[Circumcision legal commentary]]
	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}

WikiAdmin: using template PhotoMissing

2022-06-20T08:24:57Z

using template PhotoMissing

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 20 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{PhotoMissing}}
	'''William Stowell''' is the young man who brought a suit in federal court against Frank P. Cariello, the obstetrician who [[circumcision\|circumcised]] him as an infant and against [https://goodsamaritan.chsli.org/ Good Samaritan Hospital] of West Islip, New York. Stowell's suit was settled out of court in 2003 and does not constitute a legal precedent. The cash settlement is confidential, so it has not been revealed.		'''William Stowell''' is the young man who brought a suit in federal court against Frank P. Cariello, the obstetrician who [[circumcision\|circumcised]] him as an infant and against [https://goodsamaritan.chsli.org/ Good Samaritan Hospital] of West Islip, New York. Stowell's suit was settled out of court in 2003 and does not constitute a legal precedent. The cash settlement is confidential, so it has not been revealed.

WikiAdmin: added Category:Lawsuit

2021-05-01T16:37:28Z

added Category:Lawsuit

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:37, 1 May 2021
Line 77:		Line 77:
	{{DEFAULTSORT:Stowell, William}}		{{DEFAULTSORT:Stowell, William}}

	~~[[Category:USA]]~~
	[[Category:Person]]		[[Category:Person]]

	[[Category:Male]]		[[Category:Male]]
	[[Category:Intactivist]]		[[Category:Intactivist]]

			[[Category:USA]]

	[[Category:'... v. ...']]		[[Category:'... v. ...']]
			[[Category:Lawsuit]]
	[[Category:Litigation]]		[[Category:Litigation]]
	[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]		[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]

	[[Category:From IntactWiki]]		[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

WikiModEn2: /* Video */ center

2020-06-08T11:57:40Z

Video: center

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:57, 8 June 2020
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Video==		==Video==
			<center>
	<br>		<br>
	* <youtube>v=H8szj1jFCWM</youtube>		* <youtube>v=H8szj1jFCWM</youtube>
	<br>		<br>
	* <youtube>v=MMCaO1SW-dE&feature=watch_response</youtube>		* <youtube>v=MMCaO1SW-dE&feature=watch_response</youtube>
	<br>		<br></center>
	{{LINKS}}		{{LINKS}}