Extensive penile skin defect: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m changed introductory sentence
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m changed category
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Extensive penile skin defects''' and '''avulsions''' are unfortunate occurrences of male [[circumcision]]. Avulsion is the forcible tearing away of a body part by trauma or surgery.<ref>{{REFweb
'''Extensive penile skin defects''' and '''[[avulsion]]s''' are unfortunate occurrences of male [[circumcision]]. [[Avulsion]] is the forcible tearing away of a body part by [[trauma]] or surgery.<ref>{{REFweb
  |url=https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/avulsion
  |url=https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/avulsion
  |title=Avulsion
  |title=Avulsion
Line 39: Line 39:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Osifo & Oriaifo (2010) reported on 346 complications of child circumcision in Nigeria. Urethrocutaneous fistula (73, [21.1%]), redundant prepuce (51, [14.7%]), hemorrhage (46, [13.3%]), glandular injury (33, [9.5%]), glandulopenile adhesion (30, [8.7%]), implantation cyst (10, [2.9%]) [Figure 1], proximal migration of plastibell ring (11, [3.2%]) and penile tissues avulsions (17, [4.9%]) were more commonly seen than glandular amputations (9, [2.6%]), transmission of infection (4, [1.2%]), local wound infections and penopubic adhesion (2, [0.6%]).<ref name="osifo2010">{{REFjournal
Osifo & Oriaifo (2010) reported on 346 [[complication]]s of child [[circumcision]] in Nigeria. Urethrocutaneous fistula (73, [21.1%]), redundant [[prepuce]] (51, [14.7%]), [[haemorrhage]] (46, [13.3%]), glandular injury (33, [9.5%]), glandulopenile adhesion (30, [8.7%]), implantation cyst (10, [2.9%]) [figure 1], proximal migration of plastibell ring (11, [3.2%]) and penile tissues avulsions (17, [4.9%]) were more commonly seen than glandular amputations (9, [2.6%]), transmission of infection (4, [1.2%]), local wound [[infection]]s and penopubic adhesion (2, [0.6%]).<ref name="osifo2010">{{REFjournal
  |last=Osifo
  |last=Osifo
  |first=
  |first=
Line 67: Line 67:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Gao & Qu (2019) presented the case of a 31-year-old man who presented with extensive defects in his penile skin, [[infection]], and [[necrosis]] following a [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]]. A reverse bilateral anterior scrotal flap was used to correct complete penile skin loss following debridement of the infected and necrotic tissue.<ref name="gao2019">{{REFjournal
Gao & Qu (2019) presented the case of a 31-year-old man who presented with extensive defects in his [[penile skin]], [[infection]], and [[necrosis]] following a [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]]. A reverse bilateral anterior [[Scrotal skin|scrotal flap]] was used to correct complete [[penile skin]] loss following debridement of the infected and [[Necrosis|necrotic tissue]].<ref name="gao2019">{{REFjournal
  |last=Gao
  |last=Gao
  |first=
  |first=
Line 95: Line 95:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


{{REF}}
{{REF}}


[[Category:Term]]
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
[[Category:Circumcision term]]
[[de:Ausgedehnter Penishautdefekt]]