Difference between revisions of "Intraperitoneal bladder perforation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add link in SEEALSO section.) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|author4-link= | |author4-link= | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
| − | |title=Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell | + | |title=Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the [[Plastibell]] device |
|trans-title= | |trans-title= | ||
|language= | |language= | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues.<ref>{{REFweb | + | The seventy-year-old [[Plastibell]] device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of [[urination]] and other issues, up to and including [[necrosis]] of the [[glans penis]].<ref>{{REFweb |
|url=http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-perils-of-plastibell-circumcision.html | |url=http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-perils-of-plastibell-circumcision.html | ||
|archived= | |archived= | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
|format= | |format= | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
| + | }}</ref> <ref name="aminsharifi2013">{{REFjournal | ||
| + | |last=Aminsharifi | ||
| + | |first= | ||
| + | |init=A | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |last2=Afsar | ||
| + | |first2= | ||
| + | |init2=F | ||
| + | |author2-link= | ||
| + | |last3=Tourchi | ||
| + | |first3= | ||
| + | |init3=A | ||
| + | |author3-link= | ||
| + | |etal=no | ||
| + | |title=Delayed Glans Necrosis after Circumcision: Role of Testosterone in Salvaging Glans | ||
| + | |trans-title= | ||
| + | |language= | ||
| + | |journal=The Indian Journal of Pediatrics | ||
| + | |location= | ||
| + | |date=2013-09 | ||
| + | |volume=80 | ||
| + | |issue=9 | ||
| + | |article= | ||
| + | |page= | ||
| + | |pages=791-3 | ||
| + | |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12098-012-0820-y | ||
| + | |archived= | ||
| + | |quote= | ||
| + | |pubmedID=22752705 | ||
| + | |pubmedCID= | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1007/s12098-012-0820-y | ||
| + | |accessdate=2022-01-19 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | There is a history of Plastibell migration causing [[death]],<ref name="coroner2007">{{REFjournal | + | There is a history of Plastibell migration causing [[death]] of a previously healthy baby boy,<ref name="coroner2007">{{REFjournal |
|last=Coroner | |last=Coroner | ||
|first=Chief | |first=Chief | ||
| Line 70: | Line 102: | ||
|page= | |page= | ||
|pages=311-2 | |pages=311-2 | ||
| − | |url= | + | |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2528673/ |
|archived= | |archived= | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
| Line 77: | Line 109: | ||
|DOI= | |DOI= | ||
|accessdate=2022-02-18 | |accessdate=2022-02-18 | ||
| − | }}</ref> so there is a very substantial question | + | }}</ref> so there is a very substantial question concerning the medical judgment of any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] with a [[Plastibell]] device. |
| + | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| + | * [[Canada]] | ||
| + | * [[Device displacement]] | ||
| + | {{LINKS}} | ||
| + | * [https://www.cirp.org/library/death/ Deaths] | ||
| + | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Canada]] | ||
[[Category:Circumcision complication]] | [[Category:Circumcision complication]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Medical ethics]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[de:Intraperitoneale Blasenperforation]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:14, 14 April 2024
Intraperitoneal bladder perforation is an iatrogenic complication of using the Plastibell device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision of an infant boy.[1]
The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues, up to and including necrosis of the glans penis.[2] [3] There is a history of Plastibell migration causing death of a previously healthy baby boy,[4] so there is a very substantial question concerning the medical judgment of any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision with a Plastibell device.
See also
External links
References
- ↑
Dwyer, Moira, Peffer, Nathan, Fuller, Thomas, Cannon, Glenn. Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell device. Urology. March 2016; 89: 134-6. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
- ↑
Day, Danielle (2010). The Perils of Plastibell Circumcision: A Mythical "No Cutting, No Risk" Method
, Peaceful Parenting. Retrieved 18 February 2022. - ↑ Aminsharifi A, Afsar F, Tourchi A. Delayed Glans Necrosis after Circumcision: Role of Testosterone in Salvaging Glans. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. September 2013; 80(9): 791-3. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 19 January 2022.
- ↑ Coroner, Chief. Circumcision: A minor procedure?. Paediatr Child Health. April 2007; 12(4): 311-2. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
