Robert S. Van Howe: Difference between revisions

(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

'''Robert Storms Van Howe''', {{MD}}, {{MS}}, {{FAAP}}, is a pediatrician ~~and~~ professor of medicine from Marquette, {{USSC|MI}}, ~~USA.~~

'''Robert Storms Van Howe''', {{MD}}, {{MS}}, {{FAAP}}, is a pediatrician, professor of medicine, and author from Marquette, {{USSC|MI}}, [[USA]].

~~He was chosen "Intactivist of the Month" by~~ [[~~Intact America~~]].

== Research ==

{{WikipediaQuote|URL=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Van_Howe|title=Robert Van Howe}}

Van Howe's research includes a study published in 2007 in ''BJU International''. The study reported that the five most sensitive points on the human [[penis]] were all in areas of it that are removed by circumcision<ref>{{REFnews

|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19426015-500-does-circumcision-harm-your-sex-life/

Line 11:

|publisher=New Scientist

|accessdate=2017-09-12

}}</ref> and that [[~~uncircumcised~~]] men's penises were four times more sensitive, on average, than were those of [[circumcised]] men. Critics of this study have noted that it was funded by the [[National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers]] (NOCIRC), an anti-circumcision activist group. Van Howe maintains that this funding did not bias his study, telling ABC News, "The study was based on an objective finding" and "There's no way you can change what a person felt or didn't feel."<ref>{{REFnews

}}</ref> and that [[intact]] men's penises were four times more sensitive, on average, than were those of [[circumcised]] men. Critics of this study have noted that it was funded by the [[National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers]] (NOCIRC), an anti-circumcision activist group. Van Howe maintains that this funding did not bias his study, telling ABC News, "The study was based on an objective finding" and "There's no way you can change what a person felt or didn't feel."<ref>{{REFnews

|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Health/Sex/story?id=3436936&page=1

|title=Study: Circumcision Doesn't Reduce Sexual Sensation

Line 18:

|accessdate=2017-09-12

}}</ref>

</blockquote>

== Award for intactivism ==

Van Howe was chosen "[[Intactivist of the Month]]" by [[Intact America]].

Line 25:

Line 29:

* [https://cmich.academia.edu/RobertVanHowe Academia.edu]

* [[United States of America]]

* [http://www.intactamerica.org/vanhowe Interview], published on [[Intact America]]'s website

* {{URLwikipedia|Robert_Van_Howe|Robert Van Howe|~~2019~~-09-29}}

* {{URLwikipedia|Robert_Van_Howe|Robert Van Howe|2022-06-20}}

Line 44:

Line 49:

[[Category:American Academy of Pediatrics]]

[[Category:Author]]

[[Category:USA]]

[[de:Robert Van Howe]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{PhotoMissing}}
-'''Robert Storms Van Howe''', {{MD}}, {{MS}}, {{FAAP}}, is a pediatrician and professor of medicine from Marquette, {{USSC|MI}}, USA.
+'''Robert Storms Van Howe''', {{MD}}, {{MS}}, {{FAAP}}, is a pediatrician, professor of medicine, and author from Marquette, {{USSC|MI}}, [[USA]].
-He was chosen "Intactivist of the Month" by [[Intact America]].
 == Research ==
+{{WikipediaQuote|URL=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Van_Howe|title=Robert Van Howe}}
+<blockquote>
 Van Howe's research includes a study published in 2007 in ''BJU International''. The study reported that the five most sensitive points on the human [[penis]] were all in areas of it that are removed by circumcision<ref>{{REFnews
   |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19426015-500-does-circumcision-harm-your-sex-life/
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
   |publisher=New Scientist
   |accessdate=2017-09-12
-}}</ref> and that [[uncircumcised]] men's penises were four times more sensitive, on average, than were those of [[circumcised]] men. Critics of this study have noted that it was funded by the [[National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers]] (NOCIRC), an anti-circumcision activist group. Van Howe maintains that this funding did not bias his study, telling ABC News, "The study was based on an objective finding" and "There's no way you can change what a person felt or didn't feel."<ref>{{REFnews
+}}</ref> and that [[intact]] men's penises were four times more sensitive, on average, than were those of [[circumcised]] men. Critics of this study have noted that it was funded by the [[National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers]] (NOCIRC), an anti-circumcision activist group. Van Howe maintains that this funding did not bias his study, telling ABC News, "The study was based on an objective finding" and "There's no way you can change what a person felt or didn't feel."<ref>{{REFnews
   |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Health/Sex/story?id=3436936&page=1
   |title=Study: Circumcision Doesn't Reduce Sexual Sensation
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
   |accessdate=2017-09-12
 }}</ref>
+</blockquote>
+== Award for intactivism ==
+Van Howe was chosen "[[Intactivist of the Month]]" by [[Intact America]].
 {{STANDARDWORK}}
@@ Line 25: / Line 29: @@
 {{PUB}}
 * [https://cmich.academia.edu/RobertVanHowe Academia.edu]
+{{SEEALSO}}
+* [[United States of America]]
 {{LINKS}}
 * [http://www.intactamerica.org/vanhowe Interview], published on [[Intact America]]'s website
-* {{URLwikipedia|Robert_Van_Howe|Robert Van Howe|2019-09-29}}
+* {{URLwikipedia|Robert_Van_Howe|Robert Van Howe|2022-06-20}}
 {{ABBR}}
@@ Line 44: / Line 49: @@
 [[Category:American Academy of Pediatrics]]
+[[Category:Author]]
 [[Category:USA]]
 [[de:Robert Van Howe]]