IntactiWiki

Sex As Nature Intended It: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats
21,681 edits
Add external link.
Add external link.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
How does surgical alteration of the [[penis]] in infancy ([[circumcision]]) affect the sexuality of a man when he becomes an adult?
How does surgical alteration of the [[penis]] in infancy ([[circumcision]]) affect the sexuality of a man when he becomes an adult?


How does the [[circumcised]] penis affect the sexual pleasure of the woman on the receiving end? And
How does the [[circumcised]] [[penis]] affect the sexual pleasure of the woman on the receiving end? And


How does sexual pleasure during intercourse—or a deficiency—affect the love bond of the relationship?
How does sexual pleasure during intercourse—or a deficiency—affect the love bond of the relationship?
Line 29: Line 29:
Presents unequivocal evidence that the [[foreskin]] plays a multifaceted role during intercourse that not only promotes increased sexual pleasure, but this enhanced pleasure also serves to enrich and continually re-cement the love bond, borne from sexual union.
Presents unequivocal evidence that the [[foreskin]] plays a multifaceted role during intercourse that not only promotes increased sexual pleasure, but this enhanced pleasure also serves to enrich and continually re-cement the love bond, borne from sexual union.


Circumcision's removal of the [[foreskin]] (ultra-erogenous tissue and the penis's only moving part) not only diminishes the man's sexual pleasure, but also the woman's.
Circumcision's removal of the [[foreskin]] (ultra-erogenous tissue and the [[penis]]'s only moving part) not only diminishes the man's sexual pleasure, but also the woman's.


A national survey of women, conducted by the author, reveals that [[circumcision]] abnormalizes the way the [[penis]] thrusts and feels to a woman, significantly diminishing her sexual enjoyment and her ability to achieve orgasm from intercourse.
A national survey of women, conducted by the author, reveals that [[circumcision]] abnormalizes the way the [[penis]] thrusts and feels to a woman, significantly diminishing her sexual enjoyment and her ability to achieve orgasm from intercourse.


The book's explanations of the profound negative effects [[circumcision]] has on the intercourse experience of both partners will surely leave [[United States| America]] stunned. But luckily, there is a bright side to this shocking news: It is now possible to restore the foreskin through various non-surgical techniques. The book addresses this topic and enwraps the emerging movement for [[foreskin restoration]] with hope, promise, and dignity.
The book's explanations of the profound negative effects [[circumcision]] has on the intercourse experience of both partners will surely leave [[United States| America]] stunned. But luckily, there is a bright side to this shocking news: It is now possible to restore the [[foreskin]] through various non-surgical techniques. The book addresses this topic and enwraps the emerging movement for [[foreskin restoration]] with hope, promise, and dignity.


== Critics ==
== Critics ==
The [[circumcision advocate]] website [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice]] debunked the flaws and bias of O'Hara's study which is the basis of this book. While most of the counter-arguments by [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice]] seem to be valid, the refutation itself also uses wordings which expose the [[Bias| biased view]] pro circumcision of the ostensibly anonymous author of the refutation which seems to be [[Andrew Gross]].<ref>{{REFweb
The [[circumcision advocate]] website [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice]] challenged the flaws and bias of O'Hara's study which is the basis of this book. While some of the counter-arguments by [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice]] seem to be valid, the refutation itself also uses wordings which expose the [[Bias| biased view]] pro-circumcision of the ostensibly anonymous author of the refutation which seems to be [[Andrew Gross]].<ref>{{REFweb
  |url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/ohara
  |url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/ohara
  |title=Sex as the researcher intended it
  |title=Sex as the researcher intended it
Line 46: Line 46:
  |accessdate=2021-06-08
  |accessdate=2021-06-08
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Vagina]]


{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}
Line 79: Line 81:
  |DOI=10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1079.x  
  |DOI=10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1079.x  
  |accessdate=2023-01-06
  |accessdate=2023-01-06
}}
* {{REFnews
|title=A Cut Below
|url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2007/2007-07-15_SFChronicle.php
|last=Guthmann
|first=Edward
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=San Francisco Chronicle
|website=
|date=2007-07-15
|accessdate=2024-07-28
|quote=People are vociferous on the [[foreskin]] question, none more than Kristen O'Hara, the author of "Sex as Nature Intended It" (2002), in which she claims women are more likely to enjoy intercourse if their male partner is uncircumcised.
}}
}}
{{REF}}
{{REF}}


[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:Female sexuality]]
[[Category:Female sexuality]]
 
[[Category:Male sexuality]]
[[Category:Intactivist literature]]
[[Category:Intactivist literature]]
[[Category:Literature]]
[[Category:Literature]]
[[Category:USA]]


[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Sex_As_Nature_Intended_It"