Changes

'''G. S.''' is an attorney, humanist and [[File:GeorgSchepper_FB.jpg|thumb|Georg Schepper, April 2014intactivist]].

'''Georg Schepper''' is S. grew up in Landau at the Isar and, after high school and completing a German attorney from Bielefeld banking apprenticeship, studied law in Regensburg and an intactivistUtrecht (Netherlands). He is member of In the [[Facharbeitskreis Beschneidungsbetroffener|Experts Circle of Circumcision Affected Ones]] at [[MOGiS elate 1990s he withdrew from the Catholic Church.V.]], and member of the [[Bundesweiter Arbeitskreis Säkulare Grüne|BAK Secular Greens]]Since 2001 he has practiced in Bielefeld.

During Being affected from [[circumcision]] himself, G. S. showed solidarity with men who had undergone a [[circumcision]] without their own consent and do suffer from it, when the [[Circumcision debate|Debate]] erupted in Germany in 2012 as a result of the [[Cologne circumcision debatecourt judgment]]. He belongs to the co-signatories of the [[Open Letter on Circumcision]] in the ''Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung''. In October 2012, he has published a very valuable article at comprehensive analysis on the subject, where he already raised many issues such as [[MOGiS e.V.German Circumcision Act|MOGiS§ 1631d BGB]]which were discussed later by other lawyers, too.

In 2013-2014S. is a member of the [[HVD]] (Humanistischer Verband Deutschlands) (German Humanists Union), he represented the Greens politician patrons of the [[Ulf DunkelGiordano Bruno Foundation]] as his attorney in his and was member of the [[Ulf_Dunkel#Party_exclusion_procedure_discontinuedBundesweiter Arbeitskreis Säkulare Grüne|Party Exclusion ProcedureBAK Secular Greens]] and scored the non-exclusion of Dunkel on a comparison.

== External links ==It is still important to him that the [[Circumcision Debate]] will not be misused by right-wing groups. He joins his colleague [[Holger Fehmel]] who is also against racist and [[Anti-Semitism|anti-semitic]] tendencies in the debate. But he also advertises vehemently against dumb and intellectually dishonest attempts to defamate unpopular [[circumcision]] critics and possibly also religious critics by pushing them in the right corner, instead of facing factual disputes. Against this background and with this concern, he represented the Greens politician [[Ulf Dunkel]] 2012-2014 as his attorney in his [[Ulf_Dunkel#Party_exclusion_procedure_discontinued|Party Exclusion Procedure]]. At the end, [[Ulf Dunkel|Dunkel]] acknowledged that his statements had unintentionally served [[Anti-Semitism|anti-semitic]] steretypes. He credibly regretted these statements and again strongly distanced himself from [[Anti-Semitism|anti-Semitism]] and xenophobia. This way, S. scored the non-exclusion of [[Ulf Dunkel|Dunkel]] on a comparison. <!--{{LINKS}}* [https://mogis.info/blog/2012/10/03/der-zweck-heilige-die-mittel-auch-als-stellungnahme-fur-den-arbeitskreis-beschneidungsbetroffener-im-mogis-e-v/ "Der Zweck heilige die Mittel"''(The end justifies the means)''] (Statement for the [[Facharbeitskreis Beschneidungsbetroffener|Experts Circle of Circumcision Affected Ones]] at [[MOGiS e.V.]], German text)--> [[Category:Person]][[Category:Male]][[Category:Anonymous]] [[Category:Attorney]][[Category:Intactivist]] [[Category:Germany]] [[de:G. S.]]