IntactiWiki

Sexual injury of circumcision: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats
21,605 edits
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
  |year=1948
  |year=1948
  |title=Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
  |title=Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
  |url=
  |url=https://ia801508.us.archive.org/33/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.187552/2015.187552.Sexual-Behavior-In-The-Human-Male_text.pdf
  |work=
  |work=
  |editor=
  |editor=
Line 24: Line 24:
  |chapter=
  |chapter=
  |pages=
  |pages=
  |location=
  |location=Bloomington
  |publisher=A. C. Saunders
  |publisher=W.B. Saunders
  |isbn=
  |isbn=
  |quote=
  |quote=
  |accessdate=2019-12-21
  |accessdate=2019-12-21
  |note=
  |note=
|format=PDF
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 56: Line 57:
  |chapter=
  |chapter=
  |pages=
  |pages=
  |location=Toronto, New York
  |location=Boston
  |publisher=Bantam
  |publisher=Little, Brown, and Company
  |isbn=0-553-20429-7
  |isbn=0-553-20429-7
  |quote=
  |quote=
Line 115: Line 116:
  |first=William Keith C.
  |first=William Keith C.
  |init=WKC
  |init=WKC
  |author-link=William Keith Campbell Morga
  |author-link=William Keith Campbell Morgan
  |etal=No
  |etal=No
  |title=Penile Plunder
  |title=Penile Plunder
Line 322: Line 323:
  |DOI=10.1111/joa.13481  
  |DOI=10.1111/joa.13481  
  |accessdate=2021-11-15
  |accessdate=2021-11-15
}}</ref> <ref name="garret2024-02-17>{{REFweb
|url=https://intactamerica.org/what-do-the-eyelids-lips-fingertips-the-intact-penis-have-in-common/
|title=What Do The Eyelids, Lips, Fingertips & The Intact Penis Have in Common?
|last=Garret
|first=Connor
|init=
|author-link=Connor Judson Garrett
|publisher=Intact America
|date=2024-02-17
|accessdate=2024-10-22
}}</ref> Proponents of [[genital integrity]] have cited these studies, which report on the sensitivity or innervation of the foreskin, claiming a sexual role based upon the presence of nerve-endings in the foreskin sensitive to light touch, stroking and fluttering sensations.
}}</ref> Proponents of [[genital integrity]] have cited these studies, which report on the sensitivity or innervation of the foreskin, claiming a sexual role based upon the presence of nerve-endings in the foreskin sensitive to light touch, stroking and fluttering sensations.


Line 553: Line 564:
In a study of men [[circumcised]] for benign disease, Masood et al. (2005) reported that of those who stated they had prior premature ejaculation, 13% reported improvement after [[adult circumcision| circumcision]], 33% reported that it became worse, and 53% reported no change.<ref name="masood2005"/>
In a study of men [[circumcised]] for benign disease, Masood et al. (2005) reported that of those who stated they had prior premature ejaculation, 13% reported improvement after [[adult circumcision| circumcision]], 33% reported that it became worse, and 53% reported no change.<ref name="masood2005"/>


In a study of 22 men [[circumcised]] as adults, Cortés-González et al. reported that 31.8% suffered from premature ejaculation before the procedure; this diminished to 13.6% afterwards.
In a study of 22 men [[circumcised]] as adults, Cortés-González et al. reported that 31.8% suffered from premature ejaculation before the procedure; this diminished to 13.6% afterwards.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Cortés-González
|first=
|init=JR
|author-link=
|last2=Arratia-Maqueo
|first2=
|init2=JA
|author2-link=
|last3=Martínez-Montelongo
|first3=
|init3=R
|author3-link=
|last4=Gómez-Guerra
|first4=
|init4=LS
|author4-link=
|etal=no
|title=[Does circumcision affect male's perception of sexual satisfaction?]
|trans-title=
|language=Spanish
|journal=Arch Esp Urol
|location=
|date=2009-11
|volume=62
|issue=9
|pages=733-6
|url=https://www.aeurologia.com/EN/10.4321/S0004-06142009000900008
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=19955598
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.4321/s0004-06142009000900008
|accessdate=2024-08-19
}}</ref>


== Sexual practice and masturbation ==
== Sexual practice and masturbation ==
Line 686: Line 731:
  |date=1976
  |date=1976
  |accessdate=
  |accessdate=
}}</ref> (There were very few [[intact]] males in Georgia in 1976 because of the prevalence of non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]] so it is quite likely that few of the subjects tested had any experience with an [[intact]] male.)
}}</ref> (There were very few [[intact]] males in Georgia in 1976 because of the prevalence of non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]] so it is quite likely that few of the subjects tested had any experience with a [[foreskinned]] male.)


Williamson et al. (1988) studied randomly selected young mothers in Iowa, where most men are [[circumcised]], and found that 76% would prefer a [[circumcised]] penis for achieving sexual arousal through viewing it.<ref>[http://www.circs.org/library/williamson/index.html Williamson ML, Williamson PS. Women's Preferences for Penile Circumcision in Sexual Partners.] J Sex Educ Ther 1988; 14: 8</ref>  There were very few [[intact]] males in Iowa in 1988 because of the prevalence of non-therapeutic infant circumcision so it is quite likely that few of the subjects tested had any experience with an intact male.)  
Williamson et al. (1988) studied randomly selected young mothers in Iowa, where most men are [[circumcised]], and found that 76% would prefer a [[circumcised]] penis for achieving sexual arousal through viewing it.<ref>[http://www.circs.org/library/williamson/index.html Williamson ML, Williamson PS. Women's Preferences for Penile Circumcision in Sexual Partners.] J Sex Educ Ther 1988; 14: 8</ref>  There were very few [[intact]] males in Iowa in 1988 because of the prevalence of non-therapeutic infant circumcision so it is quite likely that few of the subjects tested had any experience with an intact male.)  
Line 772: Line 817:
  |DOI=
  |DOI=
  |accessdate=2020-01-04
  |accessdate=2020-01-04
}}</ref> so the lack of the foreskin in the circumcised partner renders the female experience less satisfactory.
}}</ref> so the lack of the foreskin in the [[circumcised]] partner renders the female experience less satisfactory.


In a first of its kind, O'Hara & O'Hara (1999) carried out a retrospective survey of 138 women with experience of both [[intact]] and [[circumcised]] partners. The women overwhelmingly concurred that the mechanics of coitus was different for the two groups of men. Of the women, 73% reported that [[circumcised]] men tend to thrust harder and deeper, using elongated strokes, while unaltered men by comparison tended to thrust more gently, to have shorter thrusts, and tended to be in contact with the mons pubis and [[clitoris]] more, according to 71% of the respondents. Women with intact partners had a higher rate of orgasms than women with [[circumcised]] partners. O'Hara & O'Hara concluded:
In a first of its kind, O'Hara & O'Hara (1999) carried out a retrospective survey of 138 women with experience of both [[intact]] and [[circumcised]] partners. The women overwhelmingly concurred that the mechanics of coitus was different for the two groups of men. Of the women, 73% reported that [[circumcised]] men tend to thrust harder and deeper, using elongated strokes, while unaltered men by comparison tended to thrust more gently, to have shorter thrusts, and tended to be in contact with the mons pubis and [[clitoris]] more, according to 71% of the respondents. Women with intact partners had a higher rate of orgasms than women with [[circumcised]] partners. O'Hara & O'Hara concluded:
Line 829: Line 874:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


Tye & Sardi (2022) concluded that parents must consider "psychological or psychosocial effects of circumcision,"<ref name="tye2022"> {{REFjournal
|last=Tye
|first=
|init=MC
|author-link=
|last2=Sardi
|first2=
|init2=LM
|author2-link=Lauren Sardi
|etal=no
|title=Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Int J Impot Res
|date=2023-05
|volume=35
|issue=3
|pages=242-8
|url=https://www.galdef.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Tye-Sardi-Psycho-Aspects-of-Penile-Circumcision-IJIR-2022.pdf
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=35347302
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1038/s41443-022-00553-9
|format=PDF
|accessdate=2024-12-18
}}</ref>
{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Circumcision]]
* [[Circumcision]]
* [[Circumcision: Effect upon erectile function]]
* [[Dyspareunia]]
* [[Dyspareunia]]
* [[Foreskin]]
* [[Foreskin]]
Line 845: Line 918:


{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}
* {{REFweb
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/garcia/
|title=What exactly is circumcision and what is it not?
|last=Garcia
|first=Francisco
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=Circumcision Information Pages
|date=1995-12-11
|accessdate=2025-06-29
}}
* {{REFweb
* {{REFweb
  |url=https://intactamerica.org/lousy-sex/
  |url=https://intactamerica.org/lousy-sex/
Line 916: Line 1,000:
  |accessdate=2024-06-21
  |accessdate=2024-06-21
}}
}}
* {{REFweb
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/FriendsOfTheFrenulum/comments/1ma5zqc/the_data_is_in_the_silence_is_broken_a_first_look/
|title=The Data is In. The Silence is Broken. A First Look at Our Survey's Staggering Results.
|last=Intactivist
|first=Accidental
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=REDDIT
|date=2025-07-26
|accessdate=2025-07-27
}}
{{ABBR}}
{{ABBR}}
{{REF}}
{{REF}}
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Sexual_injury_of_circumcision"