Redundant foreskin: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Acroposthion: Add link in SEEALSO section. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Circumcision revision is a [[Financial incentive| revenue generator]] for urological surgeons. | Circumcision revision is a [[Financial incentive| revenue generator]] for urological surgeons. The term ''redundant foreskin'' appears to have been invented as a sales aid for harmful, non-therapeutic surgical [[amputation]] of the [[foreskin]]. | ||
There is no accepted definition of redundant [[foreskin]]. | There is no accepted definition of redundant [[foreskin]]. | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
|accessdate=2019-11-15 | |accessdate=2019-11-15 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Acroposthion]] | |||
* [[Long foreskins]] | |||
* [[Longer foreskin is favored]] | * [[Longer foreskin is favored]] | ||
* [[Unsatisfactory cosmetic results including uncircumcised appearance]] | * [[Unsatisfactory cosmetic results including uncircumcised appearance]] | ||
{{LINKS}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/uncircumcised_talk/comments/1k6iey8/how_can_you_tell_if_someone_has_redundant/ | |||
|title=How can you tell if someone has redundant foreskin? Is it usual in the uncircumcised? | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|publisher=REDDIT | |||
|date=2025-04 | |||
|accessdate=2025-10-17 | |||
}} | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||