Circumcision industry: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Physicians: Add text and links. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add category. |
||
| (26 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Money.jpg|right|thumb|]] | |||
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the term used to identify the collection of American medical trade associations, state medical societies, hospitals, and | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the term used to identify the collection of American medical trade associations, state medical societies, hospitals, physicians, and medical journals that promote medically unnecessary, non-therapeutic male [[circumcision]] in the [[United States]], and who financially profit from the performance thereof. | ||
== Medical trade associations == | == Medical trade associations == | ||
The [[medical trade association| medical trade associations]] are primarily the American Medical Association, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American Urological Association. | The [[medical trade association| medical trade associations]] are primarily the American Medical Association, the [[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]], the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[American Academy of Family Physicians]], and the [[American Urological Association]]. | ||
Medical trade associations whose members profit from the performance of [[circumcision]] usually issue [[bias| biased]] [[Medical_trade_association#Statements_regarding_male_circumcision| statements]] to promote non-therapeutic male [[circumcision]]. | |||
== State medical societies == | == State medical societies == | ||
[https://physicianpracticespecialists.com/state-specific-services/state-medical-societies/ State medical societies] work behind the scenes within their own state to remove any impediments to the practice of medically unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] and to maintain [[third-party payment]] insurance coverage. | [https://physicianpracticespecialists.com/state-specific-services/state-medical-societies/ State medical societies] work behind the scenes within their own state to remove any impediments to the practice of medically unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] and to maintain [[third-party payment]] insurance coverage. | ||
== Hospitals == | == Hospitals == | ||
Non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of the newborn is regarded as a [https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/profitcentre.asp profit center], therefore most maternity hospitals promote and profit from the practice of medically unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision, by allowing and encouraging its practice, by automatically providing a circumcision consent form in the package of forms provided to an expectant mother in labor on admission, and by directing nurses to repeatedly inquire of mothers if a [[circumcision]] is desired.<ref>{{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.prweb.com/releases/having-a-baby-boy-intact-america-warns-get-ready-for-the-circumcision-sellers--807966573.html | |url=https://www.prweb.com/releases/having-a-baby-boy-intact-america-warns-get-ready-for-the-circumcision-sellers--807966573.html | ||
|title=Having a Baby Boy? Intact America Warns, ‘Get Ready for the Circumcision Sellers!' | |title=Having a Baby Boy? Intact America Warns, ‘Get Ready for the Circumcision Sellers!' | ||
| Line 20: | Line 23: | ||
|quote=Each year, an estimated 1.4 million baby boys are circumcised in American medical settings. [[Intact America]] estimates that if circumcision solicitations were to cease, 600,000 boys—and the men they will become—would be spared every year from the [[trauma]] and lifelong consequences of the procedure. | |quote=Each year, an estimated 1.4 million baby boys are circumcised in American medical settings. [[Intact America]] estimates that if circumcision solicitations were to cease, 600,000 boys—and the men they will become—would be spared every year from the [[trauma]] and lifelong consequences of the procedure. | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Mansfield et al. (1995) studied the use of medical resources related to non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]]. They discovered that mother and baby remain in hospital an average of one-fourth of a day longer when the newborn boy is to be circumcised.<ref name="mansfield1995">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Mansfield | |||
|first= | |||
|init=CJ | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2=Hueston | |||
|first2= | |||
|init2=WJ | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|last3=Rudy | |||
|first3= | |||
|init3=M | |||
|author3-link= | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Neonatal circumcision: associated factors and length of hospital stay | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=J Fam Pract | |||
|location= | |||
|date=1995-10 | |||
|volume=41 | |||
|article=4 | |||
|pages=370-6 | |||
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/procedure/mansfield/ | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=7561711 | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI= | |||
|doi= | |||
|accessdate=2023-11-14 | |||
}}</ref> During this time, all room and other charges increase, so a circumcision is a real windfall for the hospital. Not only does the hospital collect a facility fee for the circumcision set up, it also gets to collect additional room and other charges. | |||
Hospitals are also believed to sell the tissue from the excised infant foreskins to the bioengineering and cosmetics industries for a substantial profit.<ref>{{REFweb | |||
|url=https://beautyproductsaremycardio.com/uncovering-the-truth-are-foreskins-really-used-in-cosmetics-the-shocking-story-and-essential-information-you-need-to-know/ | |||
|title=Uncovering the Truth: Are Foreskins Really Used in Cosmetics? [The Shocking Story and Essential Information You Need to Know] | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|first= | |||
|init= | |||
|publisher=Beautyproductsaremycardio.com | |||
|date=2023 | |||
|accessdate=2023-11-14 | |||
}}</ref> <ref>{{REFweb | |||
|url=http://acroposthion.com/the-foreskin-industry/ | |||
|title=The foreskin industry | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|first= | |||
|init= | |||
|publisher=Acroposthion.com | |||
|date=2023 | |||
|accessdate=2023-11-14 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
== Physicians == | == Physicians == | ||
The physicians are primarily those who practice in the areas of general practice, obstetrics, pediatrics, or urology and who [[financial incentive| financially benefit]] from the performance of the [[pain| painful]] and [[trauma| traumatic]] [[amputation]]. | The physicians are primarily those who practice in the areas of general practice, obstetrics, pediatrics, or urology and who [[financial incentive| financially benefit]] from the performance of the [[pain| painful]] and [[trauma| traumatic]] non-therapeutic [[amputation]]. | ||
[[Issues_with_American_urologists_and_the_practice_of_male_circumcision| Urologists]] focus on | [[Issues_with_American_urologists_and_the_practice_of_male_circumcision| Urologists]] focus on adolescent and adult [[intact]] males who escaped [[circumcision]] of the newborn. | ||
== Medical journals == | == Medical journals == | ||
Medical journals are mostly those journals which focus on obstetrics, pediatrics, family practice, or urology and publish biased articles to promote the practice<ref name="fleiss1999">{{REFbook | Medical journals are mostly those journals which focus on obstetrics, pediatrics, family practice, or urology and publish [[bias| biased]] articles to promote the practice.<ref name="fleiss1999">{{REFbook | ||
|last=Fleiss | |last=Fleiss | ||
|first=Paul M. | |first=Paul M. | ||
| Line 49: | Line 106: | ||
==Profits== | ==Profits== | ||
The profits are amazingly large. Bollinger (2012) estimated annual intake from the performance of medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision to be | Professor Morgan (1967), in his classic article — ''Penile plunder'' — accurately described the only real reason for the performance of non-therapeutic circumcision as — ''chronic remunerative surgery'' — meaning long-lasting recurring compensation to the surgeon.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Morgan | |||
|first= | |||
|init=WKC | |||
|author-link=William Keith Campbell Morgan | |||
|etal=NO | |||
|title=Penile plunder | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=Med J Aust | |||
|location= | |||
|date=1967-05-27 | |||
|volume=1 | |||
|issue=21 | |||
|article= | |||
|page= | |||
|pages=1102-3 | |||
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/general/morgan2/ | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=4226264 | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI=10.5694/j.1326-5377.1967.tb20892.x | |||
|doi= | |||
|accessdate=2023-11-15 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
The profits are amazingly large. Bollinger (2012) estimated annual intake from the performance of medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] to be $3,640,000,000.<ref name="bollinger2012">{{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.academia.edu/6442587/High_Cost_of_Circumcision_3.6_Billion_Annually | |url=https://www.academia.edu/6442587/High_Cost_of_Circumcision_3.6_Billion_Annually | ||
|title=High Cost of Circumcision: $3.6 Billion Annually | |title=High Cost of Circumcision: $3.6 Billion Annually | ||
| Line 62: | Line 146: | ||
|quote=As the saying goes, follow the money. Now you know why neither the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], American Medical Association, [[American Academy of Family Physicians]], or the [[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] haven’t condemned this unnecessary surgery, and why their physician members are quick to recommend the procedure to expectant parents. | |quote=As the saying goes, follow the money. Now you know why neither the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], American Medical Association, [[American Academy of Family Physicians]], or the [[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] haven’t condemned this unnecessary surgery, and why their physician members are quick to recommend the procedure to expectant parents. | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
==Video== | |||
===This should be a crime.=== | |||
<youtube>v=ob4OADNIidc</youtube> | |||
{{SEEALSO}} | |||
* [[Financial incentive]] | |||
* [[United States of America]] | |||
{{LINKS}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=http://acroposthion.com/the-foreskin-industry/ | |||
|title=The Foreskin Industry | |||
|website=Acroposthion | |||
|accessdate=2020-03-02 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://intactamerica.org/circumcision-cleanliness-myth/ | |||
|title=“Clean” vs. “Natural”: When Language Becomes a Weapon | |||
|last=Alissa | |||
|first= | |||
|init=K | |||
|author-link=Kristel Alissa | |||
|publisher=Intact America | |||
|date=2025-05-21 | |||
|accessdate=2025-05-22 | |||
}} | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Term]] | [[Category:Term]] | ||
| Line 70: | Line 176: | ||
[[Category:Industry]] | [[Category:Industry]] | ||
[[Category:Promoter]] | [[Category:Promoter]] | ||
[[Category:Sociology]] | |||
[[Category:USA]] | |||
[[ | [[de:Beschneidungsindustrie]] | ||