Wrongful circumcision: Difference between revisions

David J. Llewellyn: Add external link.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 71: Line 71:
  |doi=10.1542/peds.2016-1484
  |doi=10.1542/peds.2016-1484
  |accessdate=2024-07-09
  |accessdate=2024-07-09
}}</ref> An infant circumcision neither diagnoses nor treats disease because no disease exists, so a surrogate consent for infant circumcision may be invalid.
}}</ref> An infant circumcision neither diagnoses nor treats disease because no disease exists, so a [[surrogate consent]] for [[circumcision of the newborn]] may be invalid.
== Common law background ==
== Common law background ==
Blackstone (1765) stated in his ''Commentaries on the Laws of England'':
Blackstone (1765) stated in his ''Commentaries on the Laws of England'':
Line 103: Line 103:


[[William Stowell]] is an outstanding example of a young man who was wrongfully circumcised and brought a suit upon reaching the age of majority. He sued his circumciser for battery and obtained an out-of-court settlement.
[[William Stowell]] is an outstanding example of a young man who was wrongfully circumcised and brought a suit upon reaching the age of majority. He sued his circumciser for battery and obtained an out-of-court settlement.
Damage rewards for wrongful circumcision have increased. One ''may'' receive a very substantial damage award for a wrongful circumcision.


== Video ==
== Video ==
Line 111: Line 113:
{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Circumcision - Your Legal Rights]]
* [[Circumcision - Your Legal Rights]]
* [[Protection of intact newborns in hospital]]
* [[United States of America]]
* [[United States of America]]
{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}