Tenets of Osteopathic Medicine: Difference between revisions

 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 46: Line 46:
  |format=PDF
  |format=PDF
  |accessdate=2026-03-18
  |accessdate=2026-03-18
}}</ref><ref name="andersen2026">{{REFjournal
}}</ref><ref name="andersen2025">{{REFjournal
  |last=Andersen-Giberson
  |last=Andersen-Giberson
  |init=D
  |init=D
Line 74: Line 74:
  |accessdate=2026-03-28
  |accessdate=2026-03-28
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
According to [[Alice Miller]]:
<blockquote>
"If we do not work on all three levels — body, feeling, mind — the symptoms of our distress will keep returning, as the body goes on repeating the story stored in its cells until it is finally listened to and understood." ~ Alice Miller<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://www.azquotes.com/author/10094-Alice_Miller
|title=Alice Miller Quotes
|last=
|first=
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=AZ Quotes
|date=
|accessdate=2026-06-01
}}</ref>
</blockquote>


===2. The body is capable of self-regulation, self-healing and health maintenance.===
===2. The body is capable of self-regulation, self-healing and health maintenance.===
Line 211: Line 226:
  |DOI=10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.06.022  
  |DOI=10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.06.022  
  |accessdate=2026-03-19
  |accessdate=2026-03-19
}}</ref> <ref name="andersen2025">{{REFjournal
}}</ref> <ref name="andersen2025" /> Boys are unable to grant consent due to their immaturity. Parental surrrogates must protect the interest and rights of the child patient. They are limited to granting [[surrogate consent]] for diagnosis and treatment of disease.  There is no person who is empowered to grant consent for non-therapeutic [[amputation]] of the [[foreskin]] of a minor.<ref name="hill2002">{{REFjournal
|last=Andersen-Giberson
|init=D
|author-link=Dale Andersen
|url=https://cdd.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cdd/article/view/39786/36016
|title=Circumcision and forced disability: Routine male neonatal circumcision and the consequences of amputation within a critical disability studies framework
|journal=Critical Disability Discourses
|date=2025-12
|volume=10
|issue=2
|pages=1-37
|URL=https://cdd.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cdd/article/view/39786/36016
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.25071/1918-6215.39786
|quote=In a critical disability studies framework, it is argued that the act of amputating healthy erogenous tissue and the consequences of that amputation cause disability, particularly from a counter-hegemonic lens.
|format=PDF
|accessdate=2026-03-14
}}</ref> Boys are unable to grant consent due their immaturity. Parental surrrogates must protect the interest of the child patient. They are limited to granting [[surrogate consent]] for diagnosis and treatment of disease.  There is no person who is empowered to grant consent for non-therapeutic [[amputation]] of the [[foreskin]] of a minor.<ref name="hill2002">{{REFjournal
  |last=Hill
  |last=Hill
  |first=
  |first=
Line 311: Line 310:
  |date=2026-01-13
  |date=2026-01-13
  |accessdate=2026-03-19
  |accessdate=2026-03-19
}}</ref> While there are no reports of a provider being criminally charged, the changing view of [[child circumcision]] has altered the atmosphere around [[child circumcision]], so a criminal charge may now be more likely than in the past.  
}}</ref> While there are no reports of an American provider being criminally charged, in the [[United Kingdom]] Dr. [[Mohammad Siddiqui]] has been struck off the Medical Register and has been criminally charged by the Crown Prosecution Service.  The changing view of [[child circumcision]] has altered the atmosphere around [[child circumcision]], so a criminal charge may now be more likely than in the past.  


It is more likely that a parent would bring a civil suit for injury caused by [[wrongful circumcision]].<ref>{{REFjournal
It is more likely that a parent would bring a civil suit for injury caused by [[wrongful circumcision]].<ref>{{REFjournal
Line 330: Line 329:


==PFFR in West Virginia==
==PFFR in West Virginia==
Parents of a boy in West Virginia have alleged that an osteopathic physician prematurely forcibly retracted the healthy [[Foreskin#Foreskin_in_infancy_and_childhoo| foreskin of a boy]], causing great [[trauma]], [[pain]], and destructive injury to the [[synechia]] that secures the protective [[foreskin]] in place. [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)| Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] assisted the parents in the filing of a complaint against the osteopathic physician.
Parents of a boy in [[West Virginia]] have alleged that an osteopathic physician prematurely forcibly retracted the healthy [[Foreskin#Foreskin_in_infancy_and_childhoo| foreskin of a boy]], causing great [[trauma]], [[pain]], and destructive injury to the [[synechia]] that secures the protective [[foreskin]] in place. [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)| Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] assisted the parents in the filing of a complaint against the osteopathic physician.


If true, then the osteopathic physician would appear to have violated the Second Tenet of Osteopathic Medicine.
If true, then the osteopathic physician would appear to have violated the Second Tenet of Osteopathic Medicine.
Line 343: Line 342:
* [[Forced foreskin retraction]]
* [[Forced foreskin retraction]]
* [[ICCPR]]
* [[ICCPR]]
* [[Intactness]]
* [[Psychiatrist Discusses the Lasting Trauma of Circumcision]]
* [[Psychiatrist Discusses the Lasting Trauma of Circumcision]]
* [[United States of America]]
* [[United States of America]]