Intact Global: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Comment by Shea Lita Bond: Correct date. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Intact Global names Colorado as a target: Add text and citation. |
||
| (19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Eric Clopper]] is the founder and president of Intact Global. | [[Eric Clopper]] is the founder and president of Intact Global. | ||
Intact Global observes that the 14<sup>th</sup> Amendment to the United States Constitution, Section 1 states in part that States shall not "<i>deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."</i> | Intact Global observes that the 14<sup>th</sup> Amendment to the United States Constitution, Section 1, states in part that States shall not "<i>deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."</i> | ||
==Inaugural conference== | ==Inaugural conference== | ||
Intact Global held its inaugural conference in Portland, Oregon on 29-30 March 2025 and followed it with a press conference on 31 March 2025. A suit has been filed on behalf of certain injured Oregonians.<ref>{{REFweb | Intact Global held its inaugural conference in Portland, Oregon on 29-30 March 2025 and followed it with a press conference on 31 March 2025. A suit has been filed on behalf of certain injured Oregonians.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
|init=SL | |init=SL | ||
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
|url= | |url=https://repository.law.uic.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1579&context=lawreview | ||
|title=Female Circumcision Laws and the Equal Protection Clause | |title=Female Circumcision Laws and the Equal Protection Clause | ||
|journal=The John Marshall Law Review | |journal=The John Marshall Law Review | ||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
===Day 2 LIVESTREAM – Intact Global’s Legal Summit for Genital Autonomy (March 30)=== | ===Day 2 LIVESTREAM – Intact Global’s Legal Summit for Genital Autonomy (March 30)=== | ||
<youtube>v=Kp4_S6_hJBU</youtube> | <youtube>v=Kp4_S6_hJBU</youtube> | ||
===Intact Global's Big Announcement Livestream=== | |||
<youtube>T1jlxRvZDC0</youtube> | |||
===A Landmark Case for Children’s Rights: Intact Global’s SECOND Constitutional Challenge=== | |||
<youtube>v=oPka-aU3O1Q</youtube> | |||
===Intact Global 2026 Conference Livestream – Day 1=== | |||
<youtube>?v=otFj_dNVLD0</youtube> | |||
===Intact Global 2026 Conference Livestream – Day 2=== | |||
<youtube>v=I3iEeuJseLE</youtube> | |||
==News on Intact Global lawsuit== | |||
The counsel for the Defendant had filed a petition to dismiss the Intact Global lawsuit. A hearing was held in Portland before Judge Melvin Oden-Orr on 23 October 2025. The Court rejected the claims of the Defendant and dismissed the petition. Apparently the way is now clear to adjudicate the case on its merits. | |||
The trial on the merits of Hadachek v. Oregon is now scheduled for December 2026. The trial readiness conference is scheduled for 4 December 2026. The actual trial is now scheduled to start on 7 December 2026 (Pearl Harbor Day). Eight days have been allocated for the trial.<ref>{{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivism/comments/1r3ubwu/trail_date_set_for_hadachek_v_oregon/ | |||
|title=Trial date set for Hadachek v Oregon | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|init= | |||
|author-link= | |||
|publisher=REDDIT | |||
|date=2026-02-13 | |||
|accessdate=2026-02-13 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<HR> | |||
===Courageous Conversations: The Fight Against Newborn Genital Mutilation=== | ===Courageous Conversations: The Fight Against Newborn Genital Mutilation=== | ||
<youtube>v=mZpzr-351M4</youtube> | <youtube>v=mZpzr-351M4</youtube> | ||
===Is circumcision child abuse? Attorney Eric Clopper meets TheTinMen=== | |||
<youtube>v=-BSsvUdAPR4</youtube> | |||
==Intact Global conference in Los Angeles in April 2026== | |||
Intact Global has announced a conference in Los Angeles, which will be held on 18-19 April 2026. | |||
===Announcement video=== | |||
<youtube>xmuzPD-1_lc</youtube> | |||
Tickets are required. | |||
==Intact Global names Colorado as a target== | |||
Intact Global has selected Colorado as the next state to be sued regarding equal protection. There will be an [https://www.reddit.com/r/IntactGlobal/comments/1ttk657/colorado_were_coming/#lightbox Colorado Launch Dinner announcement] on Monday, 14 December 2026. | |||
The Bill of Rights of Colorado is found in Article II of the Constitution of 1876.<ref>{{REFdocument | |||
|title=Constitution of the State of Colorado | |||
|url=https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/images/olls/crs2024-title-00.pdf | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|publisher=State of Colorado | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|date=1876 | |||
|accessdate=2026-06-07 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Circumcision legal commentary]] | * [[Circumcision legal commentary]] | ||
| Line 96: | Line 149: | ||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
* {{URLwebsite|https://www.intactglobal.org/|2024-08-16}} | * {{URLwebsite|https://www.intactglobal.org/|2024-08-16}} | ||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.youtube.com/@IntactGlobal | |||
|title=Intact Global YouTube Channel | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|publisher=YouTube | |||
|date= | |||
|accessdate=2026-04-18 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFdocument | |||
|title=Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors | |||
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/knmg-non-therapeutic-circumcision-of-male-minors-27-05-2010.pdf | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last=Kruseman | |||
|first=Arie Nieuwenhuijzen | |||
|publisher=Royal Dutch Medical Association | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|date=2010-05-27 | |||
|accessdate=2023-04-26 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFweb | * {{REFweb | ||
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/IntactGlobal/ | |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/IntactGlobal/ | ||
|title=Intact Global | |title=Intact Global blog | ||
|publisher=Reddit | |||
|publisher= | |||
|accessdate=2025-04-02 | |accessdate=2025-04-02 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 141: | Line 208: | ||
|date=2001 | |date=2001 | ||
|accessdate=2025-10-19 | |accessdate=2025-10-19 | ||
}} | |||
* {{REFjournal | |||
|last=Hill | |||
|first= | |||
|init=G | |||
|author-link=George Hill | |||
|title=The case against circumcision | |||
|journal=Journal of Men's Health and Gender | |||
|date=2007 | |||
|volume=4 | |||
|issue=3 | |||
|pages=318-23 | |||
|url=https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=04ace5046cc27f01b8fbe4aa359c059778983912 | |||
|quote= | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|accessdate=2025-10-20 | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFdocument | * {{REFdocument | ||
| Line 199: | Line 282: | ||
|date=2025-07-25 | |date=2025-07-25 | ||
|accessdate=2025-10-18 | |accessdate=2025-10-18 | ||
}} | |||
* {{REFnews | |||
|title=U.S. Circumcision Lawsuit Advances as Doctors Behind Policy Backtrack | |||
|url=https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/u-s-circumcision-lawsuit-advances-as-doctors-behind-policy-backtrack/ | |||
|last=Wald | |||
|first=Rebecca | |||
|author-link=Rebecca Wald | |||
|publisher=The Times of Israel | |||
|date=2025-10-28 | |||
|accessdate=2026-04-30 | |||
|quote=At issue is whether gender-specific protections against genital cutting can withstand constitutional scrutiny in an era of increasing legal and ethical focus on bodily autonomy. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||