Intact Global: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Intact Global announces a suit against the State of Colorado: Delete redundant citation. |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Eric Clopper]] is the founder and president of Intact Global. | [[Eric Clopper]] is the founder and president of Intact Global. | ||
Domashevskiy & Domashevskiy (2016) have concluded that non-therapeutic child circumcision violates numerous rights and that U.S. states have a Constitutional requirement to enforce equal protection of the laws.<ref name="domashevskiy2016">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Domashevskiy | |||
|first= | |||
|init=JA | |||
|last2=Domashevskiy | |||
|first2= | |||
|init2=AV | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Ethics pertaining to the legalities of male routine infant circumcision and surrogate consent to non-therapeutic | |||
surgery | |||
|journal=J Clin Res Bioeth | |||
|date=2016 | |||
|volume=7 | |||
|issue=4 | |||
|article=1000276 | |||
|url=https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1244&context=jj_pubs | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|doi=10.4172/2155-9627.1000276 | |||
|accessdate=2026-06-23 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
Intact Global observes that the 14<sup>th</sup> Amendment to the United States Constitution, Section 1, states in part that States shall not "<i>deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."</i> | Intact Global observes that the 14<sup>th</sup> Amendment to the United States Constitution, Section 1, states in part that States shall not "<i>deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."</i> | ||
| Line 18: | Line 40: | ||
==Popularity of circumcision in Oregon== | ==Popularity of circumcision in Oregon== | ||
Child circumcision is not popular in Oregon. Data Panda (2024) reports the incidence of [[circumcision]] of boys in Oregon in 2024 is 17 percent,<ref>{{REFweb | Child circumcision is not popular in Oregon. Data Panda (2024) reports the incidence of [[circumcision]] of boys in Oregon in 2024 is 17 percent,<ref name="panda2024">{{REFweb | ||
|url=https://www.datapandas.org/ranking/circumcision-rate-by-state | |url=https://www.datapandas.org/ranking/circumcision-rate-by-state | ||
|title=Circumcision Rate by State | |title=Circumcision Rate by State | ||
| Line 130: | Line 152: | ||
Tickets are required. | Tickets are required. | ||
==Intact Global | ==Intact Global announces a suit against the State of Colorado== | ||
Intact Global has selected [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado Colorado] as the next state to be sued regarding equal protection.<ref name="pressrelease2026-06">{{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.intactglobal.org/press/releases/2026-06-09-huff-v-colorado-filed | |||
|title=Press Release | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|init= | |||
|author-link= | |||
|publisher=Intact Global | |||
|date=2026-06-09 | |||
|accessdate=2026-06-17 | |||
</ref> <ref name="kelley2026">{{REFnews | |||
|title=Lawsuit wants male circumcisions outlawed in Colorado | |||
|url=https://www.westword.com/news/lawsuit-wants-male-circumcisions-outlawed-in-colorado-40897996/ | |||
|last=Kelley | |||
|first=Sage | |||
|init= | |||
|author-link= | |||
|publisher=Westwood | |||
|website=https://www.westword.com | |||
|date=2026-06-12 | |||
|accessdate=2026-06-16 | |||
|quote=Intact Global has set its sights on stopping circumcision for years, and now the “intactivists” are ready to make the final cut in Colorado by banning it entirely. | |||
</ref> <ref name="wingerter2026">{{REFnews | |||
|title=Lawsuit seeks to expand Colorado’s ban on female genital mutilation to also prohibit male circumcision | |||
|url=https://www.denverpost.com/2026/06/10/colorado-circumcision-lawsuit-female-genital-mutilation-child-abuse/ | |||
|last=Wingerter | |||
|first=Meg | |||
|init= | |||
|publisher=Denver Post | |||
|website=https://www.denverpost.com | |||
|date=2026-05-16 | |||
|accessdate=2026-06-16 | |||
|quote=The plaintiffs said they experienced pain, scarring and lower sexual sensitivity, which they attributed to circumcision. | |||
}}</ref> | |||
A complaint on behalf of plaintiffs Tristan Huff and Adam Schwartz in the [https://www.coloradojudicial.gov/courts/trial-courts/denver-district City & County of Denver District Court] on 9 December 2026.<ref name="rubane2026">{{REFdocument | |||
|title=Tristan Huff and Adam Schwartz, Plaintiffs, v. The State of Colorado | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|url=https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66119b8c4d0c10f195159122/6a3185315bbad632a188ed5f_2026-06-09---Huff-v.-Colorado-Complaint---Equal-Protection-Challenge-(Conformed)---For-Press.pdf | |||
|archived= | |||
|contribution= | |||
|quote= | |||
|trans-quote= | |||
|quote-lang= | |||
|last=Rubane | |||
|first=Thomas F. | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2=Clopper | |||
|first2=Eric | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|date=2026-06-09 | |||
|accessdate=2026-06-17 | |||
}}</ref> The case number is 2026CV32110. | |||
There will be an [https://www.reddit.com/r/IntactGlobal/comments/1ttk657/colorado_were_coming/#lightbox Colorado Launch Dinner announcement] on Monday, 14 December 2026. | |||
The Launch Dinner will be held in the [https://wrightroom.co/ Wright Room] of the [https://appaloosagrill.com/ Appaloosa Grill]. | The Launch Dinner will be held in the [https://wrightroom.co/ Wright Room] of the [https://appaloosagrill.com/ Appaloosa Grill]. | ||
| Line 148: | Line 226: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
The Attorney-General of Colorado is [https://coag.gov/ Phil Weiser], who would be in charge of the | The allegedly unconstitutional law is found within [https://colorado.public.law/statutes/crs_18-6-401 Colorado Revised Statute 18-6-401] where laws against child abuse are found. | ||
The Attorney-General of Colorado is [https://coag.gov/ Phil Weiser], who would be in charge of the defense of Colorado in the [https://www.coloradojudicial.gov/courts/trial-courts/denver-district Denver District Court]. | |||
Data Panda said the incidence of [[circumcision]] in Colorado was 56 percent in 2015.<ref name="panda2024" /> This datum is 11 years out-of-date. The incidence of circumcision is believed to have declined by 5.5 percentage points in that time to 50.5 percent in 2026. | |||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| Line 157: | Line 239: | ||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
* {{URLwebsite|https://www.intactglobal.org/|2024-08-16}} | * {{URLwebsite|https://www.intactglobal.org/|2024-08-16}} | ||
* {{REFjournal | * {{REFjournal | ||
|last=Povenmire | |last=Povenmire | ||
| Line 205: | Line 251: | ||
|pages=87-123 | |pages=87-123 | ||
|accessdate=2025-05-04 | |accessdate=2025-05-04 | ||
}} | |||
* {{REFjournal | |||
|last=Bond | |||
|init=SL | |||
|author-link=https://www.lawyers.com/chicago/illinois/shea-lita-bond-2071633-a/ | |||
|url=https://repository.law.uic.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1579&context=lawreview | |||
|title=State Laws Criminalizing Female Circumcision: A Violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment | |||
|journal=John Marshall Law Review | |||
|date=1999 | |||
|volume=32 | |||
|issue=Winter | |||
|pages=353-80 | |||
|accessdate=2026-08-06 | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFdocument | * {{REFdocument | ||
| Line 244: | Line 303: | ||
|date=2008-06 | |date=2008-06 | ||
|accessdate=2025-04-03 | |accessdate=2025-04-03 | ||
}} | |||
* {{REFdocument | |||
|title=Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors | |||
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/knmg-non-therapeutic-circumcision-of-male-minors-27-05-2010.pdf | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last=Kruseman | |||
|first=Arie Nieuwenhuijzen | |||
|publisher=Royal Dutch Medical Association | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|date=2010-05-27 | |||
|accessdate=2023-04-26 | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFweb | * {{REFweb | ||
| Line 249: | Line 319: | ||
|title=Circumcision and The United States Constitution: Forced Genital Cutting of Minors is Illegal | |title=Circumcision and The United States Constitution: Forced Genital Cutting of Minors is Illegal | ||
|last=Day | |last=Day | ||
|first= | |first=Danelle | ||
|init= | |init= | ||
|author-link= | |author-link=http://www.savingsons.org/search?q=Day Danelle | ||
|publisher=Saving Our Sons | |publisher=Saving Our Sons | ||
|date=2014 | |date=2014 | ||
|accessdate=2025- | |accessdate=2026-08-05 | ||
}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.youtube.com/@IntactGlobal | |||
|title=Intact Global YouTube Channel | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|publisher=YouTube | |||
|date=2024 | |||
|accessdate=2026-04-18 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/IntactGlobal/ | |||
|title=Intact Global blog | |||
|publisher=Reddit | |||
|accessdate=2025-04-02 | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFdocument | |||
|title=Constitution of Oregon | |||
|url=https://constitutionus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/oregon-state-constitution-2020.pdf | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|publisher=State of Oregon | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|date=2020 | |||
|accessdate=2025-04-01}} | |||
* {{REFnews | * {{REFnews | ||
|title=Lawyers say Oregon genital cutting law discriminates against boys; seek circumcision ban | |title=Lawyers say Oregon genital cutting law discriminates against boys; seek circumcision ban | ||
| Line 301: | Line 395: | ||
|accessdate=2026-04-30 | |accessdate=2026-04-30 | ||
|quote=At issue is whether gender-specific protections against genital cutting can withstand constitutional scrutiny in an era of increasing legal and ethical focus on bodily autonomy. | |quote=At issue is whether gender-specific protections against genital cutting can withstand constitutional scrutiny in an era of increasing legal and ethical focus on bodily autonomy. | ||
}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.galdef.org/2026/07/25/intact-global-files-colorado-equal-protection-legal-challenge/ | |||
|title=Intact Global files Colorado Equal Protection Legal Challenge | |||
|last=Thompson | |||
|first=Troy | |||
|publisher=GALDEF | |||
|date=2026-07-25 | |||
|accessdate=2026-08-05 | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||