Intact Global: Difference between revisions

 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 251: Line 251:
  |pages=87-123
  |pages=87-123
  |accessdate=2025-05-04
  |accessdate=2025-05-04
}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Bond
|init=SL
|author-link=https://www.lawyers.com/chicago/illinois/shea-lita-bond-2071633-a/
|url=https://repository.law.uic.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1579&context=lawreview
|title=State Laws Criminalizing Female Circumcision: A Violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
|journal=John Marshall Law Review
|date=1999
|volume=32
|issue=Winter
|pages=353-80
|accessdate=2026-08-06
}}
}}
* {{REFdocument
* {{REFdocument
Line 337: Line 350:
  |date=2020
  |date=2020
  |accessdate=2025-04-01}}
  |accessdate=2025-04-01}}
* {{REFweb
|url=http://www.savingsons.org/2015/07/circumcision-and-united-states.html
|title=Circumcision and The United States Constitution: Forced Genital Cutting of Minors is Illegal
|last=Day
|first=
|init=D
|author-link=
|publisher=Saving Our Sons
|date=2014
|accessdate=2025-10-18
}}
* {{REFnews
* {{REFnews
  |title=Lawyers say Oregon genital cutting law discriminates against boys; seek circumcision ban
  |title=Lawyers say Oregon genital cutting law discriminates against boys; seek circumcision ban