Difference between revisions of "Physical integrity"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (please avoid additional blank lines which add to the HTML formatting)
(Complete citation.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
  |last=Svoboda
 
  |last=Svoboda
 
  |first=J. Steven
 
  |first=J. Steven
 +
|init=JS
 
  |author-link=J. Steven Svoboda
 
  |author-link=J. Steven Svoboda
 
  |etal=no
 
  |etal=no
Line 22: Line 23:
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
* [[Declaration of Helsinki (2012)]]
 
* [[Declaration of Helsinki (2012)]]
 
+
{{LINKS}}
 +
* {{REFnews
 +
|title=Judge rules 9-year-old need not get circumcised
 +
|url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2006/2006-10-25_reuters.php
 +
|last=Anonymous
 +
|first=
 +
|init=
 +
|publisher=Reuters
 +
|website=
 +
|date=2006-10-25
 +
|accessdate=2024-07-28
 +
|quote=In granting the boy's father an injunction blocking the procedure, the judge said the boy could decide for himself whether to be circumcised when he turns 18.
 +
}}
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
  

Latest revision as of 01:39, 29 July 2024

Physical integrity and the fundamental right to one's own body, is a human right that was and continues to be repeatedly violated with the implementation of mass industrialized, non-consenting, non-therapeutic male infant circumcision in the United States. Non-therapeutic child circumcision without the consent of the child occurs more than one million times a year in the United States.[1]

See also

External links

  • REFnews Anonymous (25 October 2006)."Judge rules 9-year-old need not get circumcised", Reuters. Retrieved 28 July 2024.
    Quote: In granting the boy's father an injunction blocking the procedure, the judge said the boy could decide for himself whether to be circumcised when he turns 18.

References

  1. REFjournal Svoboda JS. Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation. J Med Ethics. July 2013; 39(7): 469-74. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 4 July 2020.