Shane Peterson: Difference between revisions

(11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

'''Shane E. Peterson''', {{PhD}}, is a Perth-based Australian [[intactivist]].

Peterson was gravely injured when he was circumcised as a child. He had surgery to repair the damage when he was 18, which required several skin grafts. He later successfully sued and was awarded damages of AU$360,000 in 1999.<ref>

Peterson was gravely injured when he was [[circumcised]] as a child. He had surgery to repair the damage when he was 18, which required several [[skin]] grafts. His attempted surgical restoration had serious complications.

He later successfully sued and was awarded damages of AU$360,000 in 1999.<ref>

{{REFnews

|title=Circumcision victim's bid to help others

Line 12:

Line 15:

|date=2002-03-31

|accessdate=2020-12-14

|quote=The amputation of part of the penis should be governed by the same rules which apply to the amputation of other body parts - urgent medical need, a serious pathological condition and informed consent.

|quote=The [[amputation]] of part of the penis should be governed by the same rules which apply to the [[amputation]] of other body parts - urgent medical need, a serious pathological condition and [[informed consent]].

}}</ref>

Line 26:

Line 29:

|date=2002-08-10

|accessdate=2020-12-14

|quote=Mr Peterson said the case illustrated a double standard whereby female circumcision was condemned as mutilation while male circumcision was viewed as trivial or even a beneficial adjustment.

|quote=Mr Peterson said the case illustrated a [[double standard]] whereby female circumcision was condemned as mutilation while male circumcision was viewed as trivial or even a beneficial adjustment.

}}</ref>

Line 43:

Line 46:

* Shane E. Peterson. [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_15 Assaulted and Mutilated: Surviving Circumcision Trauma]. presented at the Seventh International Symposium on Human Rights and Modern Society, Washington, DC, 5 April 2002.

* {{REFconference

|last=Peterson

|first=Shane E.

|author-link=Shane Peterson

|coauthors=

|coauthors-link=

|title=Assaulted and Mutilated: Surviving Circumcision Trauma

|trans-title=

|language=

|url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_15

|archived=

|place=Washington, DC

|publisher=

|source=Presented at the Seventh International Symposium on Human Rights and Modern Society

|date=2002-04-05

|accessdate=2022-09-03

}}

* [[Australia]]

* [[Penis]]

* [[Trauma]]

Line 53:

Line 77:

[[Category:Intactivist]]

[[Category:Author]]

[[Category:Australia]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{PhotoMissing}}
 '''Shane E. Peterson''', {{PhD}}, is a Perth-based Australian [[intactivist]].
-Peterson was gravely injured when he was circumcised as a child. He had surgery to repair the damage when he was 18, which required several skin grafts. He later successfully sued and was awarded damages of AU$360,000 in 1999.<ref>
+Peterson was gravely injured when he was [[circumcised]] as a child. He had surgery to repair the damage when he was 18, which required several [[skin]] grafts. His attempted surgical restoration had serious complications.
+He later successfully sued and was awarded damages of AU$360,000 in 1999.<ref>
   {{REFnews
   |title=Circumcision victim's bid to help others
@@ Line 12: / Line 15: @@
   |date=2002-03-31
   |accessdate=2020-12-14
-  |quote=The amputation of part of the penis should be governed by the same rules which apply to the amputation of other body parts - urgent medical need, a serious pathological condition and informed consent.
+  |quote=The [[amputation]] of part of the penis should be governed by the same rules which apply to the [[amputation]] of other body parts - urgent medical need, a serious pathological condition and [[informed consent]].
 }}</ref>
@@ Line 26: / Line 29: @@
   |date=2002-08-10
   |accessdate=2020-12-14
-  |quote=Mr Peterson said the case illustrated a double standard whereby female circumcision was condemned as mutilation while male circumcision was viewed as trivial or even a beneficial adjustment.
+  |quote=Mr Peterson said the case illustrated a [[double standard]] whereby female circumcision was condemned as mutilation while male circumcision was viewed as trivial or even a beneficial adjustment.
 }}</ref>
@@ Line 43: / Line 46: @@
 {{PUB}}
-* Shane E. Peterson. [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_15 Assaulted and Mutilated: Surviving Circumcision Trauma]. presented at the Seventh International Symposium on Human Rights and Modern Society, Washington, DC, 5 April 2002.
+* {{REFconference
+ |last=Peterson
+ |first=Shane E.
+ |author-link=Shane Peterson
+ |coauthors=
+ |coauthors-link=
+ |title=Assaulted and Mutilated: Surviving Circumcision Trauma
+ |trans-title=
+ |language=
+ |url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_15
+ |archived=
+ |place=Washington, DC
+ |publisher=
+ |source=Presented at the Seventh International Symposium on Human Rights and Modern Society
+ |date=2002-04-05
+ |accessdate=2022-09-03
+}}
+{{SEEALSO}}
+* [[Australia]]
+* [[Penis]]
+* [[Trauma]]
+{{ABBR}}
 {{REF}}
@@ Line 53: / Line 77: @@
 [[Category:Intactivist]]
+[[Category:Author]]
 [[Category:Australia]]