Bloodstained suit: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
added link to Who Can Wear the Bloodstain?
Revis text, Wikify.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  |Text=[[Richard Duncker]], the British [[intactivist]] and founder of [[Men Do Complain]] who started the bloodstained jumpsuit movement, followed by [[Jonathon Conte]] and [[Brother K]], two Americans who have brought Richard’s idea to the forefront of intactivism in the United States.
  |Text=[[Richard Duncker]], the British [[intactivist]] and founder of [[Men Do Complain]] who started the bloodstained jumpsuit movement, followed by [[Jonathon Conte]] and [[Brother K]], two Americans who have brought Richard’s idea to the forefront of intactivism in the United States.


“The suits for the bloodstained men were inspired by a friend,” Richard says. “I made the first suit and showed it to some colleagues in the UK, and the reaction was one of horror, as if I’d told the world’s most tasteless joke. I still thought the idea was good, so I took some photos and put them on Facebook. Later, (intactivist and videographer) [[James Loewen]] saw them and asked for permission to use one. That gave me the courage to wear the first suit in a demonstration in the UK outside the Department of Health in Whitehall.”
“The suits for the bloodstained men were inspired by a friend,” Richard says. “I made the first suit and showed it to some colleagues in the UK, and the reaction was one of horror, as if I’d told the world’s most tasteless joke. I still thought the idea was good, so I took some photos and put them on Facebook. Later, (intactivist and videographer) [[James Loewen]] saw them and asked for permission to use one. That gave me the courage to wear the first suit in a demonstration in the [[United Kingdom| UK]] outside the Department of Health in Whitehall.”


It was that post on Facebook that caught Jonathon and Brother K’s attention, too. “I first saw the white coveralls with a faux blood stain being worn by Richard on Facebook in 2010,” says Jonathon. “There was a crimson spot over his crotch which contrasted sharply with the stark, quasi-medical look of the white coveralls. The visual Richard created appealed to me not only due to his appearance but also for the sense of performance art that he seemed to convey. I decided that I wanted to try something similar.”
It was that post on Facebook that caught Jonathon and Brother K’s attention, too. “I first saw the white coveralls with a faux blood stain being worn by Richard on Facebook in 2010,” says Jonathon. “There was a crimson spot over his crotch which contrasted sharply with the stark, quasi-medical look of the white coveralls. The visual Richard created appealed to me not only due to his appearance but also for the sense of performance art that he seemed to convey. I decided that I wanted to try something similar.”
Line 16: Line 16:
“It was powerful beyond anything I’d ever seen, and it changed my view of public protests forever,” says Brother K, one of the men who joined Jonathan. The Bloodstained Men“. The bloodstain magnifies the power of the protester through its profound symbolism, an image that simultaneously reveals his wound and his resistance to it. There is no rebuttal to a bloodstain.”
“It was powerful beyond anything I’d ever seen, and it changed my view of public protests forever,” says Brother K, one of the men who joined Jonathan. The Bloodstained Men“. The bloodstain magnifies the power of the protester through its profound symbolism, an image that simultaneously reveals his wound and his resistance to it. There is no rebuttal to a bloodstain.”


After that initial demonstration—in which “our blood became public,” says Brother K—he has traveled across the United States to protest with other intactivists. “The bloodstained symbol cuts through all the clutter and rhetoric that surround this issue, and gets to the heart of circumcision. It's a bloody wound that men reject when given a choice. I believe that bloodstained protests can accelerate our progress because of the phenomenal response I've seen from the public. Thousands of people have photographed the protests, and I always say, ‘Every photo saves a baby... and THAT saves a hundred more.’"
After that initial demonstration—in which “our blood became public,” says Brother K—he has traveled across the [[United States]] to protest with other intactivists. “The bloodstained symbol cuts through all the clutter and rhetoric that surround this issue, and gets to the heart of [[circumcision]]. It's a bloody wound that men reject when given a choice. I believe that bloodstained protests can accelerate our progress because of the phenomenal response I've seen from the public. Thousands of people have photographed the protests, and I always say, ‘Every photo saves a baby... and THAT saves a hundred more.’"
  |Source=[[Intact America]]
  |Source=[[Intact America]]
  |ref=<ref>{{REFweb
  |ref=<ref>{{REFweb
Line 68: Line 68:
[[Category:BSM]]
[[Category:BSM]]
[[Category:Campaign]]
[[Category:Campaign]]
[[Category:Intactivists]]
[[Category:Intactivist]]


[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]


[[de:Blutbefleckter Anzug]]
[[de:Blutbefleckter Anzug]]