Intraperitoneal bladder perforation: Difference between revisions

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Add text and citation.
Add link in SEEALSO section.
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Intraperitoneal bladder perforation''' is an [[iatrogenic]] complication of using the [[Plastibell]] device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of an infant boy.<ref>{{REFjournal
'''Intraperitoneal bladder perforation''' is an [[iatrogenic]] complication of using the [[Plastibell]] device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of an infant boy.<ref name="dwyer2016">{{REFjournal
  |last=Dwyer
  |last=Dwyer
  |first=Moira
  |first=Moira
Line 9: Line 9:
  |author2-link=
  |author2-link=
  |last3=Fuller
  |last3=Fuller
  |first3=Thamas
  |first3=Thomas
  |init3=
  |init3=
  |author3-link=
  |author3-link=
Line 17: Line 17:
  |author4-link=
  |author4-link=
  |etal=no
  |etal=no
  |title=Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell Device
  |title=Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the [[Plastibell]] device
  |trans-title=
  |trans-title=
  |language=
  |language=
Line 28: Line 28:
  |page=
  |page=
  |pages=134-6
  |pages=134-6
  |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0090429515010857
  |url=
  |archived=
  |archived=
  |quote=
  |quote=
Line 37: Line 37:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues.<ref>{{REFweb
The seventy-year-old [[Plastibell]] device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of [[urination]] and other issues, up to and including [[necrosis]] of the [[glans penis]].<ref>{{REFweb
  |url=http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-perils-of-plastibell-circumcision.html
  |url=http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-perils-of-plastibell-circumcision.html
  |archived=
  |archived=
Line 52: Line 52:
  |format=
  |format=
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}</ref> <ref name="aminsharifi2013">{{REFjournal
|last=Aminsharifi
|first=
|init=A
|author-link=
|last2=Afsar
|first2=
|init2=F
|author2-link=
|last3=Tourchi
|first3=
|init3=A
|author3-link=
|etal=no
|title=Delayed Glans Necrosis after Circumcision: Role of Testosterone in Salvaging Glans
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=The Indian Journal of Pediatrics
|location=
|date=2013-09
|volume=80
|issue=9
|article=
|page=
|pages=791-3
|url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12098-012-0820-y
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=22752705
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1007/s12098-012-0820-y
|accessdate=2022-01-19
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
{{REF}}
There is a history of Plastibell migration causing [[death]] of a previously healthy baby boy,<ref name="coroner2007">{{REFjournal
|last=Coroner
|first=Chief
|init=
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision: A minor procedure?
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Paediatr Child Health
|location=
|date=2007-04
|volume=12
|issue=4
|article=
|page=
|pages=311-2
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2528673/
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=19030377
|pubmedCID=2528673
|DOI=
|accessdate=2022-02-18
}}</ref>  so there is a very substantial question concerning the medical judgment of any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] with a [[Plastibell]] device.
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Canada]]
* [[Device displacement]]
{{LINKS}}
* [https://www.cirp.org/library/death/ Deaths]
 
{{REF}}  


[[Category:Canada]]
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
[[Category:Medical ethics]]
[[de:Intraperitoneale Blasenperforation]]

Latest revision as of 16:14, 14 April 2024

Intraperitoneal bladder perforation is an iatrogenic complication of using the Plastibell device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision of an infant boy.[1]

The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues, up to and including necrosis of the glans penis.[2] [3] There is a history of Plastibell migration causing death of a previously healthy baby boy,[4] so there is a very substantial question concerning the medical judgment of any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision with a Plastibell device.

See also

References

  1. REFjournal Dwyer, Moira, Peffer, Nathan, Fuller, Thomas, Cannon, Glenn. Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell device. Urology. March 2016; 89: 134-6. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
  2. REFweb Day, Danielle (2010). The Perils of Plastibell Circumcision: A Mythical "No Cutting, No Risk" Method, Peaceful Parenting. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
  3. REFjournal Aminsharifi A, Afsar F, Tourchi A. Delayed Glans Necrosis after Circumcision: Role of Testosterone in Salvaging Glans. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. September 2013; 80(9): 791-3. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 19 January 2022.
  4. REFjournal Coroner, Chief. Circumcision: A minor procedure?. Paediatr Child Health. April 2007; 12(4): 311-2. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 18 February 2022.